Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
COLL vs PCRX vs AVDL vs PRGO vs MCK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Distribution
COLL vs PCRX vs AVDL vs PRGO vs MCK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $1.22B | $911M | $2.10B | $1.62B | $90.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $796M | $735M | $249M | $4.18B | $403.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $75M | $9M | $-278K | $-1.82B | $4.76B |
| Gross Margin | 60.7% | 60.2% | 94.5% | 34.2% | 3.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.8% | 3.4% | 1.8% | -4.1% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 5.1x | 8.1x | 28.3x | 5.5x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $941M | $454M | $2M | $3.97B | $8.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $251M | $159M | $51M | $532M | $3.98B |
COLL vs PCRX vs AVDL vs PRGO vs MCK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collegium Pharmaceu… (COLL) | 100 | 171.4 | +71.4% |
| Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX) | 100 | 52.7 | -47.3% |
| Avadel Pharmaceutic… (AVDL) | 100 | 266.7 | +166.7% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| McKesson Corporation (MCK) | 100 | 464.2 | +364.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COLL vs PCRX vs AVDL vs PRGO vs MCK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COLL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.28 vs MCK's 0.43
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 16.7x), PEG 0.28 vs 0.43
- 9.4% margin vs PRGO's -43.5%
Among these 5 stocks, PCRX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AVDL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 74.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 2.75x
- 5.0% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8%
- Beta 0.19 vs PRGO's 1.21, lower leverage
PRGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 9.8%
- Beta 1.21, yield 9.8%, current ratio 2.76x
- 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
MCK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 339.0% 10Y total return vs COLL's 143.2%
- 5.7% ROA vs PRGO's -19.8%, ROIC 74.5% vs 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 16.7x), PEG 0.28 vs 0.43 | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs PRGO's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +130.5% vs PRGO's -52.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs PRGO's -19.8%, ROIC 74.5% vs 3.7% |
COLL vs PCRX vs AVDL vs PRGO vs MCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
COLL vs PCRX vs AVDL vs PRGO vs MCK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
COLL leads in 2 of 6 categories
MCK leads 2 • PCRX leads 0 • AVDL leads 0 • PRGO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $403.4B annually — 1623.3x AVDL's $249M. COLL is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, AVDL holds the edge at +54.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $796M | $735M | $249M | $4.2B | $403.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $473M | $95M | $8M | $58M | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $75M | $9M | -$278,000 | -$1.8B | $4.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $330M | $133M | $35M | $108M | $6.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.7% | +60.2% | +94.5% | +34.2% | +3.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +3.4% | +1.8% | -4.1% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +1.3% | -0.1% | -43.5% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.4% | +18.1% | +14.2% | +2.6% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | +5.0% | +54.9% | -7.2% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | -30.0% | +100.7% | -56.4% | +37.0% |
Valuation Metrics
COLL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.2x trailing earnings, MCK trades at a 87% valuation discount to PCRX's 144.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCK offers better value at 0.43x vs COLL's 1.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $911M | $2.1B | $1.6B | $90.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $1.2B | $2.1B | $5.1B | $94.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.85x | 144.69x | -42.43x | -1.14x | 19.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.09x | 8.13x | 28.28x | 5.53x | 16.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.22x | — | — | — | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.63x | 9.70x | — | 7.43x | 15.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.57x | 1.25x | 12.44x | 0.38x | 0.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.97x | 1.50x | 27.88x | 0.55x | 11.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.74x | 6.66x | — | 11.17x | 14.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-51 for PRGO. AVDL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COLL's 3.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs PRGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.7% | +1.3% | -0.3% | -50.7% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +0.7% | -0.2% | -19.8% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.0% | +2.3% | -76.3% | +3.7% | +74.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.8% | +2.8% | -34.9% | +4.3% | +43.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.12x | 0.66x | 0.02x | 1.35x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $689M | $296M | -$50M | $3.4B | $4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $251M | $159M | $51M | $532M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $941M | $454M | $2M | $4.0B | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.65x | 2.37x | 0.66x | -7.20x | 33.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $37,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,802 for PCRX. Over the past 12 months, AVDL leads with a +130.5% total return vs PRGO's -52.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCK at 26.4% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.0% | -5.4% | +0.6% | -13.6% | -10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.6% | -7.1% | +130.5% | -52.0% | +7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.4% | -45.2% | +45.8% | -58.1% | +102.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.9% | -62.0% | +167.8% | -60.3% | +270.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +143.2% | -52.2% | +113.0% | -77.7% | +339.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.3% | -18.2% | +13.4% | -25.2% | +26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVDL and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCK is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRGO's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVDL currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.41x | 0.19x | 1.21x | -0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.79 | $27.64 | $23.57 | $28.44 | $999.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.81 | $18.80 | $8.44 | $9.23 | $637.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.4% | +83.8% | +91.8% | +41.2% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.1 | 45.5 | 61.8 | 53.1 | 21.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 545K | 663K | 0 | 3.3M | 782K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRGO and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COLL as "Buy", PCRX as "Hold", AVDL as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", MCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 209.1% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 4.0% for AVDL (target: $23). For income investors, PRGO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.82% vs MCK's 0.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.00 | $29.50 | $22.50 | $36.20 | $994.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 36 | 14 | 36 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 10 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | $3.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +16.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
COLL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MCK leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
COLL vs PCRX vs AVDL vs PRGO vs MCK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COLL or PCRX or AVDL or PRGO or MCK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is the stronger pick with 504.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). McKesson Corporation (MCK) offers the better valuation at 19. 2x trailing P/E (16. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COLL or PCRX or AVDL or PRGO or MCK?
On trailing P/E, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the cheapest at 19.
2x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 144. 7x. On forward P/E, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. wins at 0. 28x versus McKesson Corporation's 0. 43x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COLL or PCRX or AVDL or PRGO or MCK?
Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +270.
4%, compared to -62. 0% for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCK returned +339. 0% versus PRGO's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COLL or PCRX or AVDL or PRGO or MCK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Perrigo Company plc's 1. 21β — meaning PRGO is approximately -7506% more volatile than MCK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COLL or PCRX or AVDL or PRGO or MCK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (AVDL) is pulling ahead at 504.
8% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pacira BioSciences, Inc. grew EPS 107. 4% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, COLL leads at 18. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COLL or PCRX or AVDL or PRGO or MCK?
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
(COLL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COLL leads at 24. 0% versus -25. 1% for AVDL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVDL leads at 91. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COLL or PCRX or AVDL or PRGO or MCK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 28x versus McKesson Corporation's 0. 43x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc — 23. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 209. 1% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — COLL or PCRX or AVDL or PRGO or MCK?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield), MCK (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. COLL, PCRX, AVDL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is COLL or PCRX or AVDL or PRGO or MCK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02), +339. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCK: +339. 0%, PRGO: -77. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COLL and PCRX and AVDL and PRGO and MCK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: COLL is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVDL is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO pays a dividend while COLL, PCRX, AVDL, MCK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.