Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

COOT vs APOG vs AWI vs FLXS vs TREX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$18M
5Y Perf.-61.8%
APOG
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$788M
5Y Perf.-38.1%
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+30.2%
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$299M
5Y Perf.+49.7%
TREX
Trex Company, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.18B
5Y Perf.-59.7%

COOT vs APOG vs AWI vs FLXS vs TREX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
COOT logoCOOT
APOG logoAPOG
AWI logoAWI
FLXS logoFLXS
TREX logoTREX
IndustryPackaged FoodsConstructionConstructionFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesConstruction
Market Cap$18M$788M$6.90B$299M$4.18B
Revenue (TTM)$38M$1.40B$1.65B$458M$1.18B
Net Income (TTM)$-25M$54M$306M$22M$191M
Gross Margin9.5%22.7%40.3%23.2%39.2%
Operating Margin-2.3%6.7%27.5%6.1%22.1%
Forward P/E10.7x19.5x11.8x24.2x
Total Debt$18M$286M$532M$59M$229M
Cash & Equiv.$514K$40M$113M$40M$4M

COOT vs APOG vs AWI vs FLXS vs TREXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

COOT
APOG
AWI
FLXS
TREX
StockMar 24May 26Return
Australian Oilseeds… (COOT)10038.2-61.8%
Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG)10061.9-38.1%
Armstrong World Ind… (AWI)100130.2+30.2%
Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS)100149.7+49.7%
Trex Company, Inc. (TREX)10040.3-59.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: COOT vs APOG vs AWI vs FLXS vs TREX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: COOT and APOG are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Apogee Enterprises, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. AWI and FLXS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
COOT
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
The Growth Leader

COOT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and stability.

  • 16.3% revenue growth vs TREX's 2.0%
  • Beta 0.79 vs TREX's 1.52
Best for: growth and stability
APOG
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
The Income Pick

APOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.65x
  • PEG 0.32 vs TREX's 7.25
  • Beta 1.25, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.65x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

AWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
  • 322.1% 10Y total return vs FLXS's 53.0%
  • 18.6% margin vs COOT's -66.0%
  • 16.0% ROA vs COOT's -80.4%, ROIC 24.9% vs 10.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

FLXS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +77.1% vs TREX's -31.0%
Best for: momentum
TREX
Trex Company, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, TREX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOOT logoCOOT16.3% revenue growth vs TREX's 2.0%
ValueAPOG logoAPOGLower P/E (10.7x vs 24.2x), PEG 0.32 vs 7.25
Quality / MarginsAWI logoAWI18.6% margin vs COOT's -66.0%
Stability / SafetyCOOT logoCOOTBeta 0.79 vs TREX's 1.52
DividendsAPOG logoAPOG2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs AWI's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FLXS logoFLXS+77.1% vs TREX's -31.0%
Efficiency (ROA)AWI logoAWI16.0% ROA vs COOT's -80.4%, ROIC 24.9% vs 10.0%

COOT vs APOG vs AWI vs FLXS vs TREX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

COOTAustralian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

APOGApogee Enterprises, Inc.
FY 2026
Architectural Metals Segment
35.4%$504M
Architectural Services segment
30.8%$439M
Architectural
19.9%$284M
Performance Surfaces
13.9%$198M
AWIArmstrong World Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Mineral Fiber
63.6%$1.0B
Architectural Specialties
36.4%$590M
FLXSFlexsteel Industries, Inc.
FY 2023
Residential
100.0%$394M
TREXTrex Company, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

COOT vs APOG vs AWI vs FLXS vs TREX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAPOGLAGGINGTREX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AWI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 43.5x COOT's $38M. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COOT's -66.0%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$38M$1.4B$1.6B$458M$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$492,185$57M$603M$31M$309M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$25M$54M$306M$22M$191M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10M$95M$247M$28M$239M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+9.5%+22.7%+40.3%+23.2%+39.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.3%+6.7%+27.5%+6.1%+22.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-66.0%+3.9%+18.6%+4.8%+16.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-27.0%+6.8%+15.0%+6.1%+20.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.6%+7.1%+9.8%+1.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.1%-1.9%-27.2%+3.6%
AWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

APOG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.5x trailing earnings, APOG trades at a 36% valuation discount to AWI's 22.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APOG offers better value at 0.43x vs TREX's 6.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$18M$788M$6.9B$299M$4.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$30M$1.0B$7.3B$318M$4.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.20x14.54x22.85x15.73x22.58x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.66x19.47x11.79x24.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.43x6.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.61x21.98x16.90x10.50x13.72x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.09x0.56x4.26x0.68x3.56x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share19.28x1.54x7.83x1.89x4.16x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.28x28.05x8.85x31.05x
APOG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-5 for COOT. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COOT's 19.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs COOT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.8%+10.8%+34.8%+12.2%+18.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-80.4%+4.8%+16.0%+7.5%+12.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.0%+8.1%+24.9%+9.9%+16.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+19.3%+9.7%+26.5%+12.3%+23.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–927986
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage19.90x0.56x0.59x0.35x0.22x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$18M$247M$419M$19M$225M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$514,140$40M$113M$40M$4M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$18M$286M$532M$59M$229M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-16.29x5.97x13.31x380.21x
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AWI five years ago would be worth $15,745 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $819 for COOT. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +77.1% total return vs TREX's -31.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 51.3% vs COOT's -56.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+18.2%-1.1%-17.7%+40.4%+12.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-16.5%-6.7%+7.6%+77.1%-31.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.8%+0.1%+146.8%+246.5%-28.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.8%+11.1%+57.4%+29.5%-62.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.8%+10.6%+322.1%+53.0%+248.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-56.6%+0.0%+35.1%+51.3%-10.6%
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — COOT and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

COOT is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TREX's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs COOT's 14.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.79x1.25x0.81x1.45x1.52x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.50$49.99$206.08$59.95$68.78
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.41$30.75$149.06$29.38$29.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+14.1%+73.3%+78.5%+93.1%+58.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.454.339.860.748.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded324K252K482K47K1.7M
Evenly matched — COOT and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: APOG as "Hold", AWI as "Buy", TREX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.4% upside for APOG (target: $71) vs -3.3% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs AWI's 0.78%.

MetricCOOT logoCOOTAustralian Oilsee…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…TREX logoTREXTrex Company, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$70.50$197.50$54.00$47.44
# AnalystsCovering analysts62631
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%+0.8%+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14812
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.04$1.27$0.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.9%+1.9%+0.9%+1.3%
APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). APOG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallApogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

COOT vs APOG vs AWI vs FLXS vs TREX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is COOT or APOG or AWI or FLXS or TREX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (COOT) is the stronger pick with 16.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — COOT or APOG or AWI or FLXS or TREX?

On trailing P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

(APOG) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Armstrong World Industries, Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — COOT or APOG or AWI or FLXS or TREX?

Over the past 5 years, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) delivered a total return of +57. 4%, compared to -91. 8% for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (COOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWI returned +322. 1% versus COOT's -91. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — COOT or APOG or AWI or FLXS or TREX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (COOT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

79β versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning TREX is approximately 91% more volatile than COOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 20% for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — COOT or APOG or AWI or FLXS or TREX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (COOT) is pulling ahead at 16.

3% versus 2. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1525. 8% for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, COOT leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — COOT or APOG or AWI or FLXS or TREX?

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus -64. 2% for Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 6. 0% for APOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is COOT or APOG or AWI or FLXS or TREX more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 2x for Trex Company, Inc. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APOG: 92. 4% to $70. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — COOT or APOG or AWI or FLXS or TREX?

In this comparison, APOG (2.

8% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield), AWI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. COOT, TREX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is COOT or APOG or AWI or FLXS or TREX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 0. 8% yield, +322. 1% 10Y return). Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +322. 1%, TREX: +248. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between COOT and APOG and AWI and FLXS and TREX?

These companies operate in different sectors (COOT (Consumer Defensive) and APOG (Industrials) and AWI (Industrials) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and TREX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: COOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. APOG, AWI, FLXS pay a dividend while COOT, TREX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

COOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APOG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AWI

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLXS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TREX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform COOT and APOG and AWI and FLXS and TREX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(COOT: 16.3% · APOG: 1.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.