Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
COSM vs NTRB vs PRGO vs HROW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
COSM vs NTRB vs PRGO vs HROW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $11M | $46M | $1.61B | $1.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60M | $2M | $4.18B | $272M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-8M | $-1.82B | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 11.4% | 24.9% | 34.2% | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | -23.9% | -408.4% | -4.1% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 5.6x | 82.9x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $210K | $3.97B | $252M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $315K | $5M | $532M | $73M |
COSM vs NTRB vs PRGO vs HROW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cosmos Health Inc. (COSM) | 100 | 8.5 | -91.5% |
| Nutriband Inc. (NTRB) | 100 | 70.6 | -29.4% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
| Harrow Health, Inc. (HROW) | 100 | 387.0 | +287.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COSM vs NTRB vs PRGO vs HROW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COSM is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 92.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRGO's 9.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
NTRB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 3.1%, current ratio 6.36x
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 9.8%
- Beta 1.18, yield 9.8%, current ratio 2.76x
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 82.9x)
- Beta 1.18 vs HROW's 2.13, lower leverage
HROW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 36.4%, EPS growth 71.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 45.4%
- 9.1% 10Y total return vs NTRB's -34.0%
- 36.4% revenue growth vs NTRB's -4.8%
- -1.9% margin vs NTRB's -404.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.4% revenue growth vs NTRB's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 82.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.9% margin vs NTRB's -404.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs HROW's 2.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 92.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRGO's 9.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.8% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.4% ROA vs NTRB's -101.9%, ROIC 9.5% vs -270.2% |
COSM vs NTRB vs PRGO vs HROW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
COSM vs NTRB vs PRGO vs HROW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HROW leads in 3 of 6 categories
COSM leads 1 • NTRB leads 0 • PRGO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HROW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 2051.6x NTRB's $2M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -1.9% (HROW) to -4.0% (NTRB). On growth, COSM holds the edge at +37.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60M | $2M | $4.2B | $272M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | -$8M | $58M | $59M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$8M | -$1.8B | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$5M | $108M | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +24.9% | +34.2% | +75.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -23.9% | -4.1% | -4.1% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.0% | -4.0% | -43.5% | -1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -2.5% | +2.6% | +26.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.9% | -37.6% | -7.2% | +33.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.2% | +84.4% | -56.4% | -5.3% |
Valuation Metrics
COSM leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $46M | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $42M | $5.1B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.30x | -1.47x | -1.14x | -278.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 5.56x | 82.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 7.42x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 22.66x | 0.38x | 5.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.27x | 6.61x | 0.55x | 27.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.12x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HROW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HROW delivers a -10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-10 in annual profit, vs $-118 for NTRB. NTRB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HROW's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRGO scores 4/9 vs NTRB's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.1% | -118.3% | -50.7% | -10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.7% | -101.9% | -19.8% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -28.9% | -2.7% | +3.7% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.3% | -125.5% | +4.3% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.03x | 1.35x | 4.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | -$4M | $3.4B | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $315,105 | $5M | $532M | $73M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $209,629 | $4.0B | $252M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.42x | -369.11x | -7.20x | 0.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HROW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HROW five years ago would be worth $47,797 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $547 for COSM. Over the past 12 months, HROW leads with a +58.8% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HROW at 12.7% vs COSM's -52.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.0% | -14.4% | -13.5% | -21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.0% | -34.4% | -51.2% | +58.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +10.8% | -58.1% | +43.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.5% | -34.0% | -60.1% | +378.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.8% | -34.0% | -77.7% | +914.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.8% | +3.5% | -25.2% | +12.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRGO and HROW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRGO is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HROW's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HROW currently trades 71.2% from its 52-week high vs COSM's 26.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.20x | 1.18x | 2.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.32 | $11.68 | $28.44 | $54.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.28 | $3.42 | $9.23 | $21.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.5% | +32.4% | +41.2% | +71.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 50.8 | 60.9 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 793K | 11K | 3.4M | 733K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — COSM and PRGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRGO as "Hold", HROW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 93.8% upside for HROW (target: $76) vs 70.6% for PRGO (target: $20). For income investors, COSM offers the higher dividend yield at 92.44% vs PRGO's 9.81%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $20.00 | $75.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 36 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +92.4% | — | +9.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | — | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HROW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COSM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
COSM vs NTRB vs PRGO vs HROW: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COSM or NTRB or PRGO or HROW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Harrow Health, Inc.
(HROW) is the stronger pick with 36. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for Nutriband Inc. (NTRB). Analysts rate Harrow Health, Inc. (HROW) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — COSM or NTRB or PRGO or HROW?
Over the past 5 years, Harrow Health, Inc.
(HROW) delivered a total return of +378. 0%, compared to -94. 5% for Cosmos Health Inc. (COSM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HROW returned +914. 3% versus PRGO's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — COSM or NTRB or PRGO or HROW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
18β versus Harrow Health, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning HROW is approximately 80% more volatile than PRGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nutriband Inc. (NTRB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for Harrow Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — COSM or NTRB or PRGO or HROW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Harrow Health, Inc.
(HROW) is pulling ahead at 36. 4% versus -4. 8% for Nutriband Inc. (NTRB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Harrow Health, Inc. grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, HROW leads at 45. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — COSM or NTRB or PRGO or HROW?
Harrow Health, Inc.
(HROW) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 9% net margin versus -404. 1% for Nutriband Inc. — meaning it keeps -1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HROW leads at 11. 2% versus -408. 4% for NTRB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HROW leads at 75. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is COSM or NTRB or PRGO or HROW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 82. 9x for Harrow Health, Inc. — 77. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HROW: 93. 8% to $75. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — COSM or NTRB or PRGO or HROW?
In this comparison, COSM (92.
4% yield), PRGO (9. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NTRB, HROW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is COSM or NTRB or PRGO or HROW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
18), 9. 8% yield). Harrow Health, Inc. (HROW) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRGO: -77. 7%, HROW: +914. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between COSM and NTRB and PRGO and HROW?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: COSM is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NTRB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HROW is a small-cap high-growth stock. COSM, PRGO pay a dividend while NTRB, HROW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.