Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
COSO vs SFST vs FCCO vs JPM vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Information Technology Services
COSO vs SFST vs FCCO vs JPM vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $323M | $574M | $247M | $896.00B | $20.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $225M | $111M | $280.33B | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $30M | $19M | $57.05B | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 57.9% | 51.3% | 68.1% | 60.0% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 17.6% | 22.7% | 25.9% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 11.8x | 11.0x | 14.4x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $265M | $125M | $942.38B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $28M | $24M | $343.34B | $599M |
COSO vs SFST vs FCCO vs JPM vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoastalSouth Bancsh… (COSO) | 100 | 280.4 | +180.4% |
| Southern First Banc… (SFST) | 100 | 219.0 | +119.0% |
| First Community Cor… (FCCO) | 100 | 212.7 | +112.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COSO vs SFST vs FCCO vs JPM vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COSO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and bank quality is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 11.6%, current ratio 0.15x
- NIM 3.2% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Beta 0.51 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
SFST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +64.6% vs FIS's -49.4%
FCCO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth 36.5%
- 12.7% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs FCCO's 171.1%
- 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
- PEG 0.26 vs SFST's 1.19
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.7% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs SFST's 13.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.6% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs SFST's 0.7%, ROIC 6.0% vs 4.8% |
COSO vs SFST vs FCCO vs JPM vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
COSO vs SFST vs FCCO vs JPM vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
COSO leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • SFST leads 0 • FCCO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2524.2x FCCO's $111M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFST's 13.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $225M | $111M | $280.3B | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $44M | $26M | $81.4B | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $30M | $19M | $57.0B | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $63M | $30M | $18M | $100.9B | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.9% | +51.3% | +68.1% | +60.0% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +17.6% | +22.7% | +25.9% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +13.5% | +17.3% | +20.4% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +13.3% | +15.8% | +36.0% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.7% | +72.9% | +12.7% | +16.0% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
COSO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, COSO trades at a 76% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), COSO offers better value at 0.57x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $323M | $574M | $247M | $896.0B | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $311M | $811M | $348M | $1.50T | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.48x | 16.18x | 13.04x | 16.00x | 52.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.62x | 11.81x | 10.99x | 14.40x | 6.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.57x | 1.64x | 1.02x | 0.90x | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.31x | 18.29x | 13.25x | 18.36x | 6.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 2.55x | 2.22x | 3.20x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.33x | 1.50x | 2.47x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.27x | 19.20x | 14.04x | 8.88x | 7.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COSO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $9 for SFST. COSO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFST scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +8.6% | +12.1% | +15.9% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.7% | +0.9% | +1.3% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +4.8% | +6.8% | +4.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +5.9% | +2.4% | +8.9% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.72x | 0.74x | 2.60x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $237M | $101M | $599.0B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $28M | $24M | $343.3B | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $265M | $125M | $942.4B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.58x | 0.37x | 0.97x | 0.74x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, SFST leads with a +64.6% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.7% | +17.4% | +12.3% | -0.5% | -38.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.3% | +64.6% | +41.5% | +21.8% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.6% | +130.5% | +86.9% | +138.2% | -18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.1% | +17.4% | +77.2% | +118.2% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.2% | +142.5% | +171.1% | +465.8% | -25.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.1% | +32.1% | +23.2% | +33.6% | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — COSO and FCCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
COSO is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCCO currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.83x | 0.61x | 0.94x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.42 | $62.38 | $32.45 | $337.25 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.24 | $34.80 | $21.80 | $262.71 | $37.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +97.3% | +99.3% | +95.1% | +47.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.7 | 69.5 | 67.1 | 59.1 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 92K | 135K | 87K | 7.0M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COSO as "Buy", SFST as "Hold", FCCO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -6.9% for FCCO (target: $30). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $64.00 | $30.00 | $339.75 | $62.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 7 | 5 | 61 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | +1.9% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.61 | $5.95 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +7.0% |
COSO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FIS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
COSO vs SFST vs FCCO vs JPM vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COSO or SFST or FCCO or JPM or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Community Corporation (FCCO) is the stronger pick with 12.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COSO or SFST or FCCO or JPM or FIS?
On trailing P/E, CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc.
(COSO) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Southern First Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COSO or SFST or FCCO or JPM or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COSO or SFST or FCCO or JPM or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc.
(COSO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 85% more volatile than COSO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COSO or SFST or FCCO or JPM or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Community Corporation (FCCO) is pulling ahead at 12.
7% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern First Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 96. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COSO or SFST or FCCO or JPM or FIS?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCCO leads at 68. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COSO or SFST or FCCO or JPM or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Southern First Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — COSO or SFST or FCCO or JPM or FIS?
In this comparison, FIS (4.
2% yield), FCCO (1. 9% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. COSO, SFST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is COSO or SFST or FCCO or JPM or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Community Corporation (FCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
61), 1. 9% yield, +171. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCCO: +171. 1%, SFST: +142. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COSO and SFST and FCCO and JPM and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (COSO (Financial Services) and SFST (Financial Services) and FCCO (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: COSO is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFST is a small-cap deep-value stock; FCCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. FCCO, JPM, FIS pay a dividend while COSO, SFST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.