CPAC vs EXP

For growth investors, Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) is the stronger pick with 1. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Eagle Materials Inc.

(EXP) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. at 15. 9x. On forward P/E, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Eagle Materials Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) delivered a total return of +90. 7%, compared to +53. 8% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXP returned +201. 7% versus CPAC's +83. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Eagle Materials Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning EXP is approximately 914% more volatile than CPAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 88% versus 124% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) is pulling ahead at 1. 4% versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. grew EPS 17. 9% year-over-year, compared to 1. 2% for Eagle Materials Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXP leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Eagle Materials Inc.

(EXP) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 10. 1% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXP leads at 26. 5% versus 19. 8% for CPAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPAC leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 8x for Eagle Materials Inc. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPAC: 22. 0% to $12. 80.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) offers the highest yield at 5. 6%, versus 0. 5% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 5. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPAC: +83. 4%, EXP: +201. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

CPAC pays a dividend while EXP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.