CPAC
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
Construction Materials
Market Cap$904M
5Y Perf.+57.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CPAC vs LIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LIN
Linde plc
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$228.85B
5Y Perf.+144.1%
CPAC vs LIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CPAC | LIN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $904M | $228.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.08B | $34.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $222M | $7.13B |
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.5% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 8.3x | 27.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $26.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $73M | $5.06B |
CPAC vs LIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CPAC
LIN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cementos Pacasmayo … (CPAC) | 100 | 157.9 | +57.9% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPAC vs LIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CPAC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Linde plc is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CPAC
Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A.
The Income Pick
CPAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 5.5%
- Rev growth 1.4%, EPS growth 17.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, current ratio 1.30x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
LIN
Linde plc
The Long-Run Compounder
LIN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 375.2% 10Y total return vs CPAC's 89.0%
- 3.0% revenue growth vs CPAC's 1.4%
- 20.6% margin vs CPAC's 10.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LIN | 3.0% revenue growth vs CPAC's 1.4% |
| Value | CPAC | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 27.7x), PEG 1.00 vs 1.09 |
| Quality / Margins | LIN | 20.6% margin vs CPAC's 10.7% |
| Stability / Safety | CPAC | Beta 0.13 vs LIN's 0.24 |
| Dividends | CPAC | 5.5% yield, vs LIN's 1.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CPAC | +103.4% vs LIN's +11.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LIN | 8.3% ROA vs CPAC's 6.6%, ROIC 11.3% vs 11.0% |
CPAC vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
CPAC vs LIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCPACLAGGINGLIN
LINLinde plc
2leads
CPACCementos Pacasmayo S.…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LINMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LIN5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CPAC6/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LIN5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CPAC4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 16.6x CPAC's $2.1B. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPAC's 10.7%.
| Metric | CPACCementos Pacasmay… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $34.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $464M | $12.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $222M | $7.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $286M | $5.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | +13.4% |
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CPAC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, CPAC trades at a 53% valuation discount to LIN's 33.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LIN offers better value at 1.33x vs CPAC's 1.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | CPACCementos Pacasmay… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $904M | $228.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $250.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.04x | 33.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.25x | 27.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.95x | 1.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.31x | 19.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 6.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.60x | 5.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.18x | 44.97x |
CPAC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $16 for CPAC. LIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPAC's 1.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPAC scores 8/9 vs LIN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CPACCementos Pacasmay… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.1% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.0% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.4% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.24x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $21.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $73M | $5.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.54x | 34.52x |
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CPAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CPAC five years ago would be worth $19,524 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,394 for LIN. Over the past 12 months, CPAC leads with a +103.4% total return vs LIN's +11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CPAC at 31.5% vs LIN's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CPACCementos Pacasmay… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +103.4% | +11.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.6% | +39.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.2% | +73.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.0% | +375.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.5% | +11.8% |
CPAC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CPAC and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIN's 0.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | CPACCementos Pacasmay… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.13x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.50 | $521.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.42 | $387.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.7% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.6 | 51.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 2.3M |
Evenly matched — CPAC and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CPAC and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CPAC as "Hold" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.1% upside for CPAC (target: $13) vs 9.3% for LIN (target: $540). For income investors, CPAC offers the higher dividend yield at 5.54% vs LIN's 1.21%.
| Metric | CPACCementos Pacasmay… | LINLinde plc |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.80 | $539.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.5% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% |
Evenly matched — CPAC and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
LIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CPAC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallCementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. (CPAC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CPAC vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPAC or LIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger pick with 3.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC). Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Linde plc (LIN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPAC or LIN?
On trailing P/E, Cementos Pacasmayo S.
A. A. (CPAC) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Linde plc at 33. 8x. On forward P/E, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. wins at 1. 00x versus Linde plc's 1. 09x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPAC or LIN?
Over the past 5 years, Cementos Pacasmayo S.
A. A. (CPAC) delivered a total return of +95. 2%, compared to +73. 9% for Linde plc (LIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +375. 2% versus CPAC's +89. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPAC or LIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cementos Pacasmayo S.
A. A. (CPAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Linde plc's 0. 24β — meaning LIN is approximately 90% more volatile than CPAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Linde plc (LIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 124% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPAC or LIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Linde plc (LIN) is pulling ahead at 3.
0% versus 1. 4% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. grew EPS 17. 9% year-over-year, compared to 7. 1% for Linde plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPAC leads at 0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPAC or LIN?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus 10. 1% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus 19. 8% for CPAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPAC or LIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 00x versus Linde plc's 1. 09x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 27. 7x for Linde plc — 19. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPAC: 20. 1% to $12. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPAC or LIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 1. 2% for Linde plc (LIN).
09Is CPAC or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, CPAC: +89. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPAC and LIN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CPAC is a small-cap deep-value stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CPAC: 10.9% · LIN: 8.2%)Net Margin>
%
(CPAC: 10.7% · LIN: 20.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CPAC: 16.0x · LIN: 33.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.