Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CPSH vs GNSS vs SPOK vs LYTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
CPSH vs GNSS vs SPOK vs LYTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $61M | $93M | $226M | $765M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $51M | $103M | $592M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30K | $-15M | $11M | $26M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | 43.2% | 91.4% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | -22.1% | 13.2% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 145.4x | — | 16.5x | 22.5x |
| Total Debt | $336K | $21M | $7M | $67M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $8M | $25M | $3M |
CPSH vs GNSS vs SPOK vs LYTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPS Technologies Co… (CPSH) | 100 | 279.6 | +179.6% |
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 45.0 | -55.0% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 400.0 | +300.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPSH vs GNSS vs SPOK vs LYTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPSH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 54.3%, EPS growth 112.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.0%
- +118.1% vs SPOK's -26.6%
GNSS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 69.8% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5%
SPOK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.40, yield 11.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 22.5x)
LYTS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 109.6% 10Y total return vs CPSH's 120.6%
- 6.5% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 9.5% vs -56.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 69.8% revenue growth vs SPOK's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 22.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs GNSS's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs LYTS's 1.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs LYTS's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +118.1% vs SPOK's -26.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 9.5% vs -56.7% |
CPSH vs GNSS vs SPOK vs LYTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CPSH vs GNSS vs SPOK vs LYTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPOK leads in 3 of 6 categories
LYTS leads 2 • CPSH leads 0 • GNSS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPOK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LYTS is the larger business by revenue, generating $592M annually — 18.4x CPSH's $32M. SPOK is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNSS's -29.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $51M | $103M | $592M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $85,428 | -$9M | $17M | $51M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30,213 | -$15M | $11M | $26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$767M | -$3M | $26M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +43.2% | +91.4% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | -22.1% | +13.2% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -29.2% | +10.3% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.9% | -5.3% | +24.7% | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | +145.9% | -100.0% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +78.0% | -64.0% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SPOK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, SPOK trades at a 90% valuation discount to CPSH's 145.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SPOK's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CPSH's 127.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $61M | $93M | $226M | $765M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $57M | $107M | $207M | $828M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 145.42x | -5.15x | 14.52x | 31.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 16.50x | 22.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 127.41x | — | 8.96x | 17.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 2.29x | 1.62x | 1.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.36x | 42.83x | 1.57x | 3.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.96x | 22.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LYTS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYTS delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. CPSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPSH scores 6/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.2% | -8.2% | +7.3% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | -22.0% | +5.2% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | -56.7% | +11.3% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | -68.2% | +12.1% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 9.85x | 0.05x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $13M | -$18M | $63M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $8M | $25M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $336,000 | $21M | $7M | $67M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -31.66x | — | 13.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LYTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYTS five years ago would be worth $32,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,672 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, CPSH leads with a +118.1% total return vs SPOK's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYTS at 26.2% vs GNSS's -10.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | -5.5% | -13.8% | +33.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +118.1% | 0.0% | -26.6% | +53.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.8% | -29.2% | +13.8% | +101.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.1% | -63.3% | +61.7% | +227.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.6% | +18.3% | +13.6% | +109.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.6% | -10.9% | +4.4% | +26.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPOK and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPOK is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LYTS's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs SPOK's 56.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.85x | 0.40x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.85 | $2.70 | $19.31 | $24.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.65 | $1.40 | $9.96 | $15.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.0% | +76.3% | +56.4% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.7 | 60.8 | 42.5 | 70.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 262K | 96K | 170K | 375K |
Analyst Outlook
SPOK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPOK as "Hold", LYTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.7% upside for SPOK (target: $15) vs 9.9% for LYTS (target: $27). For income investors, SPOK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.88% vs LYTS's 0.79%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $15.00 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +11.9% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 5 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.29 | $0.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.3% | 0.0% |
SPOK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LYTS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CPSH vs GNSS vs SPOK vs LYTS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPSH or GNSS or SPOK or LYTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPSH or GNSS or SPOK or LYTS?
On trailing P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus CPS Technologies Corporation at 145. 4x. On forward P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPSH or GNSS or SPOK or LYTS?
Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) delivered a total return of +227. 7%, compared to -63. 3% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPSH returned +120. 6% versus SPOK's +13. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPSH or GNSS or SPOK or LYTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning LYTS is approximately 247% more volatile than SPOK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CPS Technologies Corporation (CPSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPSH or GNSS or SPOK or LYTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus 1. 5% for Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CPS Technologies Corporation grew EPS 112. 4% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for LSI Industries Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPSH or GNSS or SPOK or LYTS?
Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 4% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPOK leads at 14. 1% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPSH or GNSS or SPOK or LYTS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for LSI Industries Inc. — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPOK: 37. 7% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPSH or GNSS or SPOK or LYTS?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield), LYTS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CPSH, GNSS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CPSH or GNSS or SPOK or LYTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), 11. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOK: +13. 6%, CPSH: +120. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPSH and GNSS and SPOK and LYTS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CPSH (Technology) and GNSS (Technology) and SPOK (Healthcare) and LYTS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CPSH is a small-cap high-growth stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock. SPOK, LYTS pay a dividend while CPSH, GNSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.