Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CRC vs SM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CRC
California Resources Corporation

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.45B
5Y Perf.+4521.1%
SM
SM Energy Company

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.28B
5Y Perf.+711.1%

CRC vs SM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CRC logoCRC
SM logoSM
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$5.45B$3.28B
Revenue (TTM)$3.48B$3.15B
Net Income (TTM)$363M$648M
Gross Margin37.4%31.9%
Operating Margin20.8%26.1%
Forward P/E12.1x4.3x
Total Debt$1.36B$2.30B
Cash & Equiv.$132M$368M

CRC vs SMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CRC
SM
StockMay 20May 26Return
California Resource… (CRC)1004621.1+4521.1%
SM Energy Company (SM)100811.1+711.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CRC vs SM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. California Resources Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CRC
California Resources Corporation
The Growth Play

CRC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth -10.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
  • 287.0% 10Y total return vs SM's 118.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 37.0%, current ratio 0.89x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SM
SM Energy Company
The Income Pick

SM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 2.8%
  • Beta 0.16, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.69x
  • Lower P/E (4.3x vs 12.1x)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCRC logoCRC21.9% revenue growth vs SM's 18.1%
ValueSM logoSMLower P/E (4.3x vs 12.1x)
Quality / MarginsSM logoSM20.5% margin vs CRC's 10.4%
Stability / SafetySM logoSMBeta 0.16 vs CRC's 0.45
DividendsSM logoSM2.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CRC's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)CRC logoCRC+77.5% vs SM's +36.5%
Efficiency (ROA)SM logoSM7.2% ROA vs CRC's 5.2%, ROIC 8.9% vs 13.8%

CRC vs SM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CRCCalifornia Resources Corporation
FY 2025
Natural Gas, Production
60.5%$144M
Oil and Condensate
36.1%$86M
Propane
3.4%$8M
SMSM Energy Company
FY 2025
E&P Segment
100.0%$3.2B

CRC vs SM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSMLAGGINGCRC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CRC and SM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CRC and SM operate at a comparable scale, with $3.5B and $3.2B in trailing revenue. SM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRC's 10.4%. On growth, CRC holds the edge at -5.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCRC logoCRCCalifornia Resour…SM logoSMSM Energy Company
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.5B$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.3B$2.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$363M$648M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$543M-$241M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.4%+31.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.8%+26.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.4%+20.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.6%-7.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.9%-14.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-61.1%-41.7%
Evenly matched — CRC and SM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.1x trailing earnings, SM trades at a 66% valuation discount to CRC's 14.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SM's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRC's 4.5x.

MetricCRC logoCRCCalifornia Resour…SM logoSMSM Energy Company
Market CapShares × price$5.5B$3.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.7B$5.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.81x5.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.12x4.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.52x2.57x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.51x1.04x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.46x0.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.04x5.73x
SM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CRC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SM delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $10 for CRC. CRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SM's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SM scores 7/9 vs CRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCRC logoCRCCalifornia Resour…SM logoSMSM Energy Company
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.3%+14.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.2%+7.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.8%+8.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.6%+10.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.37x0.48x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.2B$1.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$132M$368M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.4B$2.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.75x2.92x
CRC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CRC five years ago would be worth $27,895 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,422 for SM. Over the past 12 months, CRC leads with a +77.5% total return vs SM's +36.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRC at 18.3% vs SM's 5.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCRC logoCRCCalifornia Resour…SM logoSMSM Energy Company
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+33.4%+50.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+77.5%+36.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+65.5%+16.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+178.9%+84.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+287.0%+118.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.3%+5.3%
CRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SM is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRC's 0.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCRC logoCRCCalifornia Resour…SM logoSMSM Energy Company
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.45x0.16x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$71.98$33.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$35.04$17.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.4%+85.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.460.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded972K5.9M
SM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates CRC as "Buy" and SM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.2% upside for CRC (target: $68) vs 1.6% for SM (target: $29). For income investors, SM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs CRC's 2.53%.

MetricCRC logoCRCCalifornia Resour…SM logoSMSM Energy Company
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$68.33$29.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2354
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises44
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.56$0.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.9%+0.4%
SM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). CRC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallSM Energy Company (SM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CRC vs SM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CRC or SM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, California Resources Corporation (CRC) is the stronger pick with 21.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 1% for SM Energy Company (SM). SM Energy Company (SM) offers the better valuation at 5. 1x trailing P/E (4. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate California Resources Corporation (CRC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CRC or SM?

On trailing P/E, SM Energy Company (SM) is the cheapest at 5.

1x versus California Resources Corporation at 14. 8x. On forward P/E, SM Energy Company is actually cheaper at 4. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CRC or SM?

Over the past 5 years, California Resources Corporation (CRC) delivered a total return of +178.

9%, compared to +84. 2% for SM Energy Company (SM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRC returned +287. 0% versus SM's +118. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CRC or SM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SM Energy Company (SM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

16β versus California Resources Corporation's 0. 45β — meaning CRC is approximately 171% more volatile than SM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, California Resources Corporation (CRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 48% for SM Energy Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CRC or SM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), California Resources Corporation (CRC) is pulling ahead at 21.

9% versus 18. 1% for SM Energy Company (SM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: California Resources Corporation grew EPS -10. 2% year-over-year, compared to -15. 4% for SM Energy Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRC leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CRC or SM?

SM Energy Company (SM) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

5% net margin versus 10. 1% for California Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SM leads at 26. 1% versus 23. 6% for CRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRC leads at 39. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CRC or SM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SM Energy Company (SM) trades at 4.

3x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for California Resources Corporation — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRC: 11. 2% to $68. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CRC or SM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SM Energy Company (SM) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 2. 5% for California Resources Corporation (CRC).

09

Is CRC or SM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SM Energy Company (SM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

16), 2. 8% yield, +118. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SM: +118. 0%, CRC: +287. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CRC and SM?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CRC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CRC and SM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CRC: -5.9% · SM: -14.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(CRC: 10.4% · SM: 20.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CRC: 14.8x · SM: 5.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.