Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CRDF logo
CRDF
IMVT logo
IMVT
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CRDF vs IMVT vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CRDF
Cardiff Oncology, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$109M
5Y Perf.-69.3%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.75B
5Y Perf.+38.1%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.22B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

CRDF vs IMVT vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CRDF logoCRDF
IMVT logoIMVT
KO logoKO
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$109M$6.75B$355.22B
Revenue (TTM)$525K$0.00$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-45M$-506M$13.70B
Gross Margin-21.5%61.7%
Operating Margin-90.3%29.3%
Forward P/E25.2x
Total Debt$832K$72K$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$17M$902M$10.27B

CRDF vs IMVT vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CRDF
IMVT
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Cardiff Oncology, I… (CRDF)10030.7-69.3%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100138.1+38.1%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CRDF vs IMVT vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Immunovant, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CRDF
Cardiff Oncology, Inc.
The Income Pick

CRDF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.30
Best for: income & stability
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 230.5% 10Y total return vs KO's 120.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.67, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 9.09x
  • Beta 1.67, current ratio 9.09x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Growth Play

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
  • 1.9% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
  • 27.8% margin vs CRDF's -85.3%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKO logoKO1.9% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs CRDF's -85.3%
Stability / SafetyIMVT logoIMVTBeta 1.67 vs CRDF's 2.30, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IMVT logoIMVT+103.6% vs CRDF's -58.9%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs CRDF's -71.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs -118.9%

CRDF vs IMVT vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CRDFCardiff Oncology, Inc.
FY 2020
Royalty
100.0%$365,993
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

CRDF vs IMVT vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGCRDF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRDF's -85.3%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$525,000$0$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$46M-$532M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$45M-$506M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$37M-$407M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-21.5%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-90.3%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-85.3%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-71.4%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-62.4%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.7%-14.1%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CRDF and IMVT and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$109M$6.8B$355.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$92M$5.8B$390.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.30x-11.87x27.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue183.32x7.41x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.34x7.04x10.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.07x
Evenly matched — CRDF and IMVT and KO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-96 for CRDF. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-95.5%-68.2%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-71.5%-62.2%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-118.9%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-75.8%-68.3%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9327
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.00x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$17M-$902M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$17M$902M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$832,000$72,000$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IMVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,018 for CRDF. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +103.6% total return vs CRDF's -58.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 14.9% vs CRDF's -0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-40.2%+26.9%+20.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-58.9%+103.6%+17.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.9%+51.6%+46.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.8%+207.0%+63.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%+230.5%+120.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.6%+14.9%+13.7%
IMVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRDF's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs CRDF's 34.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.23x1.66x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.56$36.27$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.36$14.32$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+34.9%+90.6%+98.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.151.965.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M1.9M12.6M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CRDF as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.8% upside for IMVT (target: $44) vs 4.6% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCRDF logoCRDFCardiff Oncology,…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.00$43.67$86.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts142348
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises156
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IMVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CRDF vs IMVT vs KO: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CRDF or IMVT or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger pick with 1.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 2% for Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — CRDF or IMVT or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -79. 8% for Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +237. 9% versus CRDF's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — CRDF or IMVT or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Cardiff Oncology, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning CRDF is approximately -1214% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — CRDF or IMVT or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is pulling ahead at 1.

9% versus -13. 2% for Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cardiff Oncology, Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1. 5% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRDF leads at 15. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — CRDF or IMVT or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -77. 3% for Cardiff Oncology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -82. 6% for CRDF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRDF leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is CRDF or IMVT or KO more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMVT: 32.

8% to $43. 67.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CRDF or IMVT or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. CRDF, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is CRDF or IMVT or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CRDF: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CRDF and IMVT and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (CRDF (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

KO pays a dividend while CRDF, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.