CREV vs FOXF

For growth investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) is the stronger pick with 86.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). Analysts rate Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Fox Factory Holding Corp.

(FOXF) delivered a total return of -88. 4%, compared to -98. 6% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOXF returned +7. 0% versus CREV's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Factory Holding Corp.

(FOXF) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 55β versus Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 92β — meaning CREV is approximately 24% more volatile than FOXF relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) is pulling ahead at 86.

8% versus 5. 3% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -82. 5% for Fox Factory Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CREV leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Fox Factory Holding Corp.

(FOXF) is the more profitable company, earning -37. 1% net margin versus -309. 4% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps -37. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOXF leads at -35. 6% versus -235. 9% for CREV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOXF leads at 30. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fox Factory Holding Corp.

(FOXF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOXF: +7. 0%, CREV: -98. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CREV is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOXF is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.