Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CRGO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FRGT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Software - Application
CRGO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FRGT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $105M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $170K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29M | $72M | $71M | $13M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 66.8% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 13.5% |
| Operating Margin | -65.0% | -121.4% | -405.7% | -39.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $8.76B | $32M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $204K |
CRGO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FRGT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freightos Limited O… (CRGO) | 100 | 20.9 | -79.1% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 47.2 | -52.8% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 656.1 | +556.1% |
| Freight Technologie… (FRGT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRGO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FRGT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRGO is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.98, current ratio 2.16x
SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -78.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
FRGT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 1.57
- -40.3% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- Beta 1.57 vs SPIR's 2.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -40.3% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.57 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs FRGT's -86.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -12.6% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC -47.1% vs -0.1% |
CRGO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FRGT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CRGO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FRGT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FRGT leads in 1 of 6 categories
SPIR leads 1 • ASTS leads 1 • CRGO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRGT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPIR is the larger business by revenue, generating $72M annually — 5.4x FRGT's $13M. FRGT is the more profitable business, keeping -40.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29M | $72M | $71M | $13M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | -$74M | -$237M | -$5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$25.0B | -$342M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | -$9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +13.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -65.0% | -121.4% | -4.1% | -39.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -59.5% | -349.6% | -4.8% | -40.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.4% | -227.0% | -16.0% | -64.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +30.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.1% | +59.5% | -55.6% | +76.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CRGO and ASTS and FRGT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $105M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $169,559 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $93M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $3M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.86x | 10.01x | -48.76x | -0.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.57x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 0.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.42x | 4.56x | 5.68x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASTS delivers a -21.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-21 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRGO's 0.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs FRGT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.8% | -88.4% | -21.1% | -85.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.9% | -47.3% | -12.6% | -43.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -37.5% | -0.1% | -47.1% | -147.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -37.4% | -0.1% | -10.0% | -5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.08x | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $204,032 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $8.8B | $32M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -71.01x | 9.20x | -21.20x | -7.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for FRGT. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs FRGT's -86.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs FRGT's -92.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.1% | +106.4% | -21.7% | -59.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.4% | +73.1% | +158.1% | -86.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.9% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.0% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.0% | -78.8% | +568.8% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.8% | +43.9% | +134.8% | -92.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPIR and FRGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FRGT is the less volatile stock with a 1.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 68.3% from its 52-week high vs FRGT's 8.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.24 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $8.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.17 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $0.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.3% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +8.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 35.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 137K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 193K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRGO as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | $17.25 | $103.65 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 12 | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FRGT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SPIR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CRGO vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FRGT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRGO or SPIR or ASTS or FRGT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freightos Limited Ordinary shares (CRGO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CRGO or SPIR or ASTS or FRGT?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Freight Technologies, Inc. (FRGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus FRGT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CRGO or SPIR or ASTS or FRGT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Freight Technologies, Inc.
(FRGT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 57β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 87% more volatile than FRGT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 10% for Freightos Limited Ordinary shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CRGO or SPIR or ASTS or FRGT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 23. 9% for Freightos Limited Ordinary shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CRGO or SPIR or ASTS or FRGT?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRGT leads at -47. 3% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRGO leads at 66. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CRGO or SPIR or ASTS or FRGT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CRGO or SPIR or ASTS or FRGT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+568. 8% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASTS: +568. 8%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CRGO and SPIR and ASTS and FRGT?
These companies operate in different sectors (CRGO (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and FRGT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CRGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FRGT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.