Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CRGY vs VTLE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
CRGY vs VTLE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $4.33B | $693M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.81B | $1.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-285M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 70.3% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.8% | -58.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.4x | 4.0x |
| Total Debt | $5.71B | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $40M |
CRGY vs VTLE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crescent Energy Com… (CRGY) | 100 | 103.3 | +3.3% |
| Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRGY vs VTLE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRGY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 3.6%
- -8.8% 10Y total return vs VTLE's -92.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 1.48x
VTLE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth -114.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.9%
- 26.2% revenue growth vs CRGY's 22.1%
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 6.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% revenue growth vs CRGY's 22.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 6.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -7.5% margin vs VTLE's -69.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs VTLE's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.8% vs VTLE's +29.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.6% ROA vs VTLE's -27.9%, ROIC 3.9% vs -0.3% |
CRGY vs VTLE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRGY vs VTLE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRGY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRGY is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.8B annually — 2.0x VTLE's $1.9B. CRGY is the more profitable business, keeping -7.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTLE's -69.3%. On growth, CRGY holds the edge at +24.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.8B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | -$334M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$285M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $308M | $656M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.3% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | -58.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | -69.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +34.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.5% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -127.0% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
VTLE leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VTLE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRGY's 6.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $693M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.0B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.26x | -3.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.37x | 3.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.11x | 4.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 0.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 0.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.93x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRGY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRGY delivers a -6.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VTLE. VTLE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.95x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRGY's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRGY scores 5/9 vs VTLE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.0% | -74.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | -27.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.9% | -0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.7B | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.26x | -5.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRGY leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRGY five years ago would be worth $9,120 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,927 for VTLE. Over the past 12 months, CRGY leads with a +70.8% total return vs VTLE's +29.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRGY at 10.1% vs VTLE's -25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +55.3% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.8% | +29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.4% | -59.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.8% | -50.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.8% | -92.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.1% | -25.7% |
Risk & Volatility
CRGY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CRGY is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VTLE's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRGY currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs VTLE's 81.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.29 | $22.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.68 | $13.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.6M | 17 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CRGY as "Buy" and VTLE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.3% upside for VTLE (target: $23) vs -2.3% for CRGY (target: $13). CRGY is the only dividend payer here at 3.59% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.80 | $23.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.47 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.5% |
CRGY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VTLE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CRGY vs VTLE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRGY or VTLE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) is the stronger pick with 26. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 1% for Crescent Energy Company (CRGY). Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) offers the better valuation at 24. 3x trailing P/E (6. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRGY or VTLE?
On forward P/E, Vital Energy, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRGY or VTLE?
Over the past 5 years, Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) delivered a total return of -8.
8%, compared to -50. 7% for Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRGY returned -8. 8% versus VTLE's -92. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRGY or VTLE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus Vital Energy, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning VTLE is approximately 110% more volatile than CRGY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vital Energy, Inc. (VTLE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 95% versus 111% for Crescent Energy Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRGY or VTLE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) is pulling ahead at 26. 2% versus 22. 1% for Crescent Energy Company (CRGY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crescent Energy Company grew EPS 161. 4% year-over-year, compared to -114. 2% for Vital Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VTLE leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRGY or VTLE?
Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
7% net margin versus -8. 9% for Vital Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRGY leads at 13. 2% versus -1. 2% for VTLE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VTLE leads at 31. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRGY or VTLE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Energy, Inc.
(VTLE) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 6. 4x for Crescent Energy Company — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VTLE: 28. 3% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRGY or VTLE?
In this comparison, CRGY (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. VTLE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRGY or VTLE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRGY: -8. 8%, VTLE: -92. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRGY and VTLE?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CRGY pays a dividend while VTLE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.