Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $1.32B | $877M | $4.06B | $2.29B | $47.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.95B | $3.14B | $8.78B | $3.44B | $7.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $91M | $80M | $469M | $330M | $919M |
| Gross Margin | 44.7% | 42.4% | 58.2% | 42.0% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 3.7% | 7.4% | 13.1% | 15.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 10.4x | 8.1x | 9.8x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.21B | $1.42B | $3.39B | $2.55B | $2.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $487M | $188M | $748M | $215M | $1.92B |
CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carter's, Inc. (CRI) | 100 | 41.6 | -58.4% |
| Guess', Inc. (GES) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
| Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
| Ralph Lauren Corpor… (RL) | 100 | 468.2 | +368.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, current ratio 2.51x
GES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 5.6%
- Beta 0.82, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.50x
- 7.9% revenue growth vs PVH's -6.1%
- Beta 0.82 vs HBI's 1.72, lower leverage
PVH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.60 vs CRI's 15.21
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 21.7x), PEG 0.60 vs 1.18
Among these 5 stocks, HBI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 19.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- 319.2% 10Y total return vs GES's 56.6%
- 11.7% margin vs GES's 2.6%
- 11.8% ROA vs GES's 2.7%, ROIC 20.6% vs 7.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.9% revenue growth vs PVH's -6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 21.7x), PEG 0.60 vs 1.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.7% margin vs GES's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs HBI's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CRI's 4.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.5% vs CRI's +12.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs GES's 2.7%, ROIC 20.6% vs 7.8% |
CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RL leads in 3 of 6 categories
GES leads 2 • PVH leads 1 • CRI leads 0 • HBI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 3.0x CRI's $2.9B. RL is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GES's 2.6%. On growth, RL holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $3.1B | $8.8B | $3.4B | $7.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $188M | $150M | $924M | $496M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $91M | $80M | $469M | $330M | $919M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $127M | $123M | $516M | -$8M | $695M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.7% | +42.4% | +58.2% | +42.0% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +3.7% | +7.4% | +13.1% | +15.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +2.6% | +5.3% | +9.6% | +11.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +3.9% | +5.9% | -0.2% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.1% | +7.2% | +4.5% | -4.8% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.0% | +2.0% | +65.0% | +8.0% | +24.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PVH leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, PVH trades at a 72% valuation discount to RL's 30.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PVH offers better value at 0.62x vs CRI's 15.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $877M | $4.1B | $2.3B | $47.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $2.1B | $6.7B | $4.6B | $48.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.80x | 21.83x | 8.39x | -7.11x | 30.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.80x | 10.38x | 8.12x | 9.82x | 21.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 15.21x | — | 0.62x | — | 1.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.26x | 8.72x | 6.61x | 16.64x | 42.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 0.29x | 0.47x | 0.65x | 6.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.37x | 2.09x | 0.98x | 66.99x | 8.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.21x | 24.63x | 6.97x | 10.11x | 46.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBI delivers a 73.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $74 in annual profit, vs $10 for PVH. PVH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBI's 75.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RL scores 8/9 vs HBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.1% | +14.2% | +9.6% | +73.9% | +31.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +2.7% | +4.0% | +7.7% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +7.8% | +7.0% | +4.5% | +20.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +9.3% | +8.8% | +5.4% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | 2.58x | 0.66x | 75.02x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $725M | $1.2B | $2.6B | $2.3B | $746M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $487M | $188M | $748M | $215M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.4B | $3.4B | $2.6B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.12x | 3.90x | 2.42x | 2.15x | 23.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RL five years ago would be worth $26,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,362 for HBI. Over the past 12 months, GES leads with a +57.5% total return vs CRI's +12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RL at 48.2% vs CRI's -14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.4% | +0.1% | +30.7% | — | -2.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.1% | +57.5% | +24.6% | +32.3% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.7% | +22.1% | +7.7% | +49.1% | +225.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.4% | -19.5% | -24.8% | -66.4% | +164.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.0% | +56.6% | -1.9% | -62.6% | +319.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.1% | +6.9% | +2.5% | +14.2% | +48.2% |
Risk & Volatility
GES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GES is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBI's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GES currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs CRI's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 0.82x | 1.48x | 1.72x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.44 | $17.15 | $100.15 | $7.05 | $393.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.38 | $10.29 | $59.60 | $3.96 | $237.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +98.0% | +88.5% | +91.8% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.2 | 54.4 | 60.3 | 44.3 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 9.1M | 1.1M | 104.2M | 532K |
Analyst Outlook
GES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRI as "Buy", GES as "Hold", PVH as "Buy", HBI as "Buy", RL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.8% upside for GES (target: $26) vs 3.5% for CRI (target: $37). For income investors, GES offers the higher dividend yield at 5.57% vs PVH's 0.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $26.19 | $100.00 | $7.25 | $428.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 32 | 38 | 34 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +5.6% | +0.2% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.59 | $0.94 | $0.15 | — | $3.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.9% | +12.9% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
RL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GES leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Guess', Inc.
(GES) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Carter's, Inc. (CRI) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?
On trailing P/E, PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Ralph Lauren Corporation at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, PVH Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PVH Corp. wins at 0. 60x versus Carter's, Inc. 's 15. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?
Over the past 5 years, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) delivered a total return of +164.
4%, compared to -66. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RL returned +319. 2% versus HBI's -62. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guess', Inc.
(GES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Hanesbrands Inc. 's 1. 72β — meaning HBI is approximately 108% more volatile than GES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PVH Corp. (PVH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 75% for Hanesbrands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Guess', Inc.
(GES) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ralph Lauren Corporation grew EPS 19. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1698. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GES leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?
Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
5% net margin versus -9. 1% for Hanesbrands Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RL leads at 13. 2% versus 5. 0% for CRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RL leads at 68. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PVH Corp. (PVH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 60x versus Carter's, Inc. 's 15. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PVH Corp. (PVH) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Ralph Lauren Corporation — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GES: 55. 8% to $26. 19.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?
In this comparison, GES (5.
6% yield), CRI (4. 4% yield), RL (0. 9% yield), PVH (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guess', Inc.
(GES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 5. 6% yield). Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GES: +56. 6%, HBI: -62. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRI and GES and PVH and HBI and RL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRI is a small-cap deep-value stock; GES is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock; HBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CRI, GES, RL pay a dividend while PVH, HBI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.