Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CRI
Carter's, Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-58.4%
GES
Guess', Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$877M
5Y Perf.+75.0%
PVH
PVH Corp.

Apparel - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.06B
5Y Perf.+94.9%
HBI
Hanesbrands Inc.

Apparel - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.29B
5Y Perf.-34.4%
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation

Apparel - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$47.87B
5Y Perf.+368.2%

CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CRI logoCRI
GES logoGES
PVH logoPVH
HBI logoHBI
RL logoRL
IndustryApparel - RetailApparel - RetailApparel - ManufacturersApparel - ManufacturersApparel - Manufacturers
Market Cap$1.32B$877M$4.06B$2.29B$47.87B
Revenue (TTM)$2.95B$3.14B$8.78B$3.44B$7.83B
Net Income (TTM)$91M$80M$469M$330M$919M
Gross Margin44.7%42.4%58.2%42.0%69.6%
Operating Margin5.0%3.7%7.4%13.1%15.0%
Forward P/E10.8x10.4x8.1x9.8x21.7x
Total Debt$1.21B$1.42B$3.39B$2.55B$2.67B
Cash & Equiv.$487M$188M$748M$215M$1.92B

CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CRI
GES
PVH
HBI
RL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Carter's, Inc. (CRI)10041.6-58.4%
Guess', Inc. (GES)100175.0+75.0%
PVH Corp. (PVH)100194.9+94.9%
Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI)10065.6-34.4%
Ralph Lauren Corpor… (RL)100468.2+368.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GES leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Ralph Lauren Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. PVH also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CRI
Carter's, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CRI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.34, current ratio 2.51x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
GES
Guess', Inc.
The Income Pick

GES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 5.6%
  • Beta 0.82, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.50x
  • 7.9% revenue growth vs PVH's -6.1%
  • Beta 0.82 vs HBI's 1.72, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and defensive
PVH
PVH Corp.
The Value Pick

PVH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.60 vs CRI's 15.21
  • Lower P/E (8.1x vs 21.7x), PEG 0.60 vs 1.18
Best for: valuation efficiency
HBI
Hanesbrands Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, HBI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
The Growth Play

RL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 19.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
  • 319.2% 10Y total return vs GES's 56.6%
  • 11.7% margin vs GES's 2.6%
  • 11.8% ROA vs GES's 2.7%, ROIC 20.6% vs 7.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGES logoGES7.9% revenue growth vs PVH's -6.1%
ValuePVH logoPVHLower P/E (8.1x vs 21.7x), PEG 0.60 vs 1.18
Quality / MarginsRL logoRL11.7% margin vs GES's 2.6%
Stability / SafetyGES logoGESBeta 0.82 vs HBI's 1.72, lower leverage
DividendsGES logoGES5.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CRI's 4.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GES logoGES+57.5% vs CRI's +12.1%
Efficiency (ROA)RL logoRL11.8% ROA vs GES's 2.7%, ROIC 20.6% vs 7.8%

CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CRICarter's, Inc.
FY 2025
Baby
43.5%$1.3B
Playclothes
31.6%$915M
Other Products
12.8%$372M
Sleepwear
12.1%$352M
GESGuess', Inc.
FY 2025
Product
95.8%$2.9B
Royalty
4.2%$124M
PVHPVH Corp.
FY 2024
Product
95.8%$8.2B
Royalty
4.2%$361M
HBIHanesbrands Inc.
FY 2024
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$6M
RLRalph Lauren Corporation
FY 2020
Other Non-Reportable Segment-Related
100.0%$370M

CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRLLAGGINGHBI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

PVH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 3.0x CRI's $2.9B. RL is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GES's 2.6%. On growth, RL holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCRI logoCRICarter's, Inc.GES logoGESGuess', Inc.PVH logoPVHPVH Corp.HBI logoHBIHanesbrands Inc.RL logoRLRalph Lauren Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.9B$3.1B$8.8B$3.4B$7.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$188M$150M$924M$496M$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$91M$80M$469M$330M$919M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$127M$123M$516M-$8M$695M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.7%+42.4%+58.2%+42.0%+69.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.0%+3.7%+7.4%+13.1%+15.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.1%+2.6%+5.3%+9.6%+11.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.3%+3.9%+5.9%-0.2%+8.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.1%+7.2%+4.5%-4.8%+12.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.0%+2.0%+65.0%+8.0%+24.7%
RL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PVH leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.4x trailing earnings, PVH trades at a 72% valuation discount to RL's 30.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PVH offers better value at 0.62x vs CRI's 15.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCRI logoCRICarter's, Inc.GES logoGESGuess', Inc.PVH logoPVHPVH Corp.HBI logoHBIHanesbrands Inc.RL logoRLRalph Lauren Corp…
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$877M$4.1B$2.3B$47.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.0B$2.1B$6.7B$4.6B$48.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.80x21.83x8.39x-7.11x30.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.80x10.38x8.12x9.82x21.72x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate15.21x0.62x1.65x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.26x8.72x6.61x16.64x42.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.45x0.29x0.47x0.65x6.76x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.37x2.09x0.98x66.99x8.74x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.21x24.63x6.97x10.11x46.98x
PVH leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

HBI delivers a 73.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $74 in annual profit, vs $10 for PVH. PVH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBI's 75.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RL scores 8/9 vs HBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCRI logoCRICarter's, Inc.GES logoGESGuess', Inc.PVH logoPVHPVH Corp.HBI logoHBIHanesbrands Inc.RL logoRLRalph Lauren Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.1%+14.2%+9.6%+73.9%+31.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.6%+2.7%+4.0%+7.7%+11.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.7%+7.8%+7.0%+4.5%+20.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.2%+9.3%+8.8%+5.4%+18.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955748
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.31x2.58x0.66x75.02x1.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$725M$1.2B$2.6B$2.3B$746M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$487M$188M$748M$215M$1.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.2B$1.4B$3.4B$2.6B$2.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.12x3.90x2.42x2.15x23.25x
RL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RL five years ago would be worth $26,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,362 for HBI. Over the past 12 months, GES leads with a +57.5% total return vs CRI's +12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RL at 48.2% vs CRI's -14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCRI logoCRICarter's, Inc.GES logoGESGuess', Inc.PVH logoPVHPVH Corp.HBI logoHBIHanesbrands Inc.RL logoRLRalph Lauren Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.4%+0.1%+30.7%-2.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+12.1%+57.5%+24.6%+32.3%+48.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-36.7%+22.1%+7.7%+49.1%+225.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.4%-19.5%-24.8%-66.4%+164.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.0%+56.6%-1.9%-62.6%+319.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.1%+6.9%+2.5%+14.2%+48.2%
RL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GES is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBI's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GES currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs CRI's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCRI logoCRICarter's, Inc.GES logoGESGuess', Inc.PVH logoPVHPVH Corp.HBI logoHBIHanesbrands Inc.RL logoRLRalph Lauren Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.34x0.82x1.48x1.72x1.50x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$44.44$17.15$100.15$7.05$393.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$23.38$10.29$59.60$3.96$237.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+80.4%+98.0%+88.5%+91.8%+89.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.254.460.344.354.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M9.1M1.1M104.2M532K
GES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CRI as "Buy", GES as "Hold", PVH as "Buy", HBI as "Buy", RL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.8% upside for GES (target: $26) vs 3.5% for CRI (target: $37). For income investors, GES offers the higher dividend yield at 5.57% vs PVH's 0.17%.

MetricCRI logoCRICarter's, Inc.GES logoGESGuess', Inc.PVH logoPVHPVH Corp.HBI logoHBIHanesbrands Inc.RL logoRLRalph Lauren Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$37.00$26.19$100.00$7.25$428.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts2432383448
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.4%+5.6%+0.2%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises04014
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.59$0.94$0.15$3.14
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+6.9%+12.9%0.0%+1.0%
GES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

RL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GES leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallRalph Lauren Corporation (RL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CRI vs GES vs PVH vs HBI vs RL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Guess', Inc.

(GES) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Carter's, Inc. (CRI) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?

On trailing P/E, PVH Corp.

(PVH) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Ralph Lauren Corporation at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, PVH Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PVH Corp. wins at 0. 60x versus Carter's, Inc. 's 15. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?

Over the past 5 years, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) delivered a total return of +164.

4%, compared to -66. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RL returned +319. 2% versus HBI's -62. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guess', Inc.

(GES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Hanesbrands Inc. 's 1. 72β — meaning HBI is approximately 108% more volatile than GES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PVH Corp. (PVH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 75% for Hanesbrands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Guess', Inc.

(GES) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ralph Lauren Corporation grew EPS 19. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1698. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GES leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?

Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

5% net margin versus -9. 1% for Hanesbrands Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RL leads at 13. 2% versus 5. 0% for CRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RL leads at 68. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, PVH Corp. (PVH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 60x versus Carter's, Inc. 's 15. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PVH Corp. (PVH) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Ralph Lauren Corporation — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GES: 55. 8% to $26. 19.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL?

In this comparison, GES (5.

6% yield), CRI (4. 4% yield), RL (0. 9% yield), PVH (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CRI or GES or PVH or HBI or RL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Guess', Inc.

(GES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 5. 6% yield). Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GES: +56. 6%, HBI: -62. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CRI and GES and PVH and HBI and RL?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CRI is a small-cap deep-value stock; GES is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock; HBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CRI, GES, RL pay a dividend while PVH, HBI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CRI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GES

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PVH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HBI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RL

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CRI and GES and PVH and HBI and RL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CRI: 8.1% · GES: 7.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(CRI: 3.1% · GES: 2.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CRI: 13.8x · GES: 21.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.