CRK
Comstock Resources, Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$4.35B
5Y Perf.+176.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CRK vs EQT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
EQT
EQT Corporation
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$35.10B
5Y Perf.+321.5%
CRK vs EQT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CRK | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $4.35B | $35.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.01B | $10.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $653M | $3.35B |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.5% | 46.7% |
| Forward P/E | 19.6x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.95B | $7.80B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $111M |
CRK vs EQT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CRK
EQT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comstock Resources,… (CRK) | 100 | 276.0 | +176.0% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | 100 | 421.5 | +321.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRK vs EQT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EQT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Comstock Resources, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CRK
Comstock Resources, Inc.
The Income Pick
CRK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.11
- 340.6% 10Y total return vs EQT's 56.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 99.6%, current ratio 0.49x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
EQT
EQT Corporation
The Growth Play
EQT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 73.7%, EPS growth 7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.3%
- 73.7% revenue growth vs CRK's 52.2%
- Lower P/E (11.4x vs 19.6x)
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EQT | 73.7% revenue growth vs CRK's 52.2% |
| Value | EQT | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 19.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | EQT | 33.4% margin vs CRK's 32.6% |
| Stability / Safety | CRK | Beta 0.11 vs EQT's 0.23 |
| Dividends | EQT | 1.1% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | EQT | +5.7% vs CRK's -33.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CRK | 9.4% ROA vs EQT's 8.2%, ROIC 4.8% vs 6.9% |
CRK vs EQT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
CRK vs EQT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEQTLAGGINGCRK
CRKComstock Resources, I…
1leads
EQTEQT Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CRKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EQT6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CRK3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
EQT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
EQT1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.0B annually — 5.0x CRK's $2.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 33.4% (EQT) to 32.6% (CRK). On growth, EQT holds the edge at +39.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $10.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $7.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $653M | $3.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$54M | $4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.4% | +64.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +46.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +33.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +40.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +39.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +190.5% | +5.2% |
EQT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CRK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, CRK trades at a 35% valuation discount to EQT's 17.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRK's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EQT's 7.4x.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $35.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.3B | $42.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.96x | 16.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.55x | 11.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.25x | 7.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.28x | 3.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.37x |
CRK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CRK and EQT each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRK delivers a 23.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $12 for EQT. EQT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRK's 1.00x.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.6% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.4% | +8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $111M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $7.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.14x | 11.47x |
Evenly matched — CRK and EQT each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EQT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EQT five years ago would be worth $28,509 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,817 for CRK. Over the past 12 months, EQT leads with a +5.7% total return vs CRK's -33.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQT at 21.8% vs CRK's 16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.3% | +5.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.9% | +5.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.1% | +80.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.2% | +185.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +340.6% | +56.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.0% | +21.8% |
EQT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CRK and EQT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CRK is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EQT's 0.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EQT currently trades 82.4% from its 52-week high vs CRK's 47.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.17 | $68.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.40 | $48.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.5% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.7 | 40.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 7.6M |
Evenly matched — CRK and EQT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
EQT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CRK as "Hold" and EQT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.5% upside for CRK (target: $22) vs -26.9% for EQT (target: $41). EQT is the only dividend payer here at 1.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.67 | $41.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
EQT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
EQT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CRK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallEQT Corporation (EQT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CRK vs EQT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRK or EQT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EQT Corporation (EQT) is the stronger pick with 73.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 52. 2% for Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK). Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (19. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EQT Corporation (EQT) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRK or EQT?
On trailing P/E, Comstock Resources, Inc.
(CRK) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus EQT Corporation at 17. 0x. On forward P/E, EQT Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRK or EQT?
Over the past 5 years, EQT Corporation (EQT) delivered a total return of +185.
1%, compared to +168. 2% for Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRK returned +340. 6% versus EQT's +56. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRK or EQT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comstock Resources, Inc.
(CRK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus EQT Corporation's 0. 23β — meaning EQT is approximately 119% more volatile than CRK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EQT Corporation (EQT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 100% for Comstock Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRK or EQT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EQT Corporation (EQT) is pulling ahead at 73.
7% versus 52. 2% for Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EQT Corporation grew EPS 707. 3% year-over-year, compared to 277. 6% for Comstock Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EQT leads at -9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRK or EQT?
EQT Corporation (EQT) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
5% net margin versus 20. 7% for Comstock Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQT leads at 34. 7% versus 19. 0% for CRK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EQT leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRK or EQT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, EQT Corporation (EQT) trades at 11.
4x forward P/E versus 19. 6x for Comstock Resources, Inc. — 8. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRK: 46. 5% to $21. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRK or EQT?
In this comparison, EQT (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. CRK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRK or EQT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EQT Corporation (EQT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
23), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EQT: +56. 5%, CRK: +340. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRK and EQT?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
EQT pays a dividend while CRK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CRK: 14.5% · EQT: 39.7%)Net Margin>
%
(CRK: 32.6% · EQT: 33.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CRK: 11.0x · EQT: 17.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.