Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CRS vs SPIR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
CRS vs SPIR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $22.76B | $601.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.03B | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $479M | $-25.02B |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 21.3% | -121.4% |
| Forward P/E | 44.4x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $738M | $8.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $316M | $24.81B |
CRS vs SPIR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carpenter Technolog… (CRS) | 100 | 1874.6 | +1774.6% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRS vs SPIR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.37, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth 100.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
- 13.0% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -75.9%
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.4x vs 44.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 44.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.37 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +121.1% vs SPIR's +93.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.6% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 17.5% vs -0.1% |
CRS vs SPIR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CRS vs SPIR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 42.3x SPIR's $72M. CRS is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, CRS holds the edge at +11.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $791M | -$74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $479M | -$25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $407M | -$16.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | -121.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | -349.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | -227.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.6% | -26.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.3% | +59.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SPIR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.4x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 82% valuation discount to CRS's 61.7x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.8B | $601.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23.2B | $585.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 61.75x | 11.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.43x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.08x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.91x | 8406.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.31x | 5.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 79.57x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRS delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRS's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRS scores 7/9 vs SPIR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.4% | -88.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.6% | -47.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.5% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.9% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $423M | -$16.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $316M | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $738M | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.82x | 9.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRS five years ago would be worth $111,795 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,311 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, CRS leads with a +121.1% total return vs SPIR's +93.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRS at 108.4% vs SPIR's 50.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.5% | +134.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +121.1% | +93.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +805.4% | +238.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1017.9% | -76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1297.7% | -75.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +108.4% | +50.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CRS is the less volatile stock with a 1.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRS currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs SPIR's 77.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 2.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $461.99 | $23.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $204.47 | $6.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.7 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 696K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CRS as "Buy" and SPIR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.6% upside for CRS (target: $475) vs -5.7% for SPIR (target: $17). CRS is the only dividend payer here at 0.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $474.50 | $17.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
CRS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPIR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CRS vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRS or SPIR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) is the stronger pick with 4.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRS or SPIR?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus Carpenter Technology Corporation at 61. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRS or SPIR?
Over the past 5 years, Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) delivered a total return of +1018%, compared to -76.
9% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRS returned +1298% versus SPIR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRS or SPIR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
37β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 114% more volatile than CRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 39% for Carpenter Technology Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRS or SPIR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) is pulling ahead at 4.
3% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 100. 5% for Carpenter Technology Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRS leads at 16. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRS or SPIR?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 13. 1% for Carpenter Technology Corporation — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRS leads at 18. 1% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPIR leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRS or SPIR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRS: 3.
6% to $474. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRS or SPIR?
In this comparison, CRS (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SPIR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRS or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1298% 10Y return).
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRS: +1298%, SPIR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRS and SPIR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.