Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CRVS vs IMVT vs RCUS vs TPVG vs NKTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Asset Management
Biotechnology
CRVS vs IMVT vs RCUS vs TPVG vs NKTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Asset Management | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.23B | $5.53B | $2.50B | $243M | $223M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $236M | $97M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $-464M | $-369M | $-12M | $-103M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 90.7% | 83.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -168.6% | 77.9% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 6.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $937K | $98K | $99M | $469M | $80M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $714M | $222M | $20M | $28M |
CRVS vs IMVT vs RCUS vs TPVG vs NKTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corvus Pharmaceutic… (CRVS) | 100 | 344.1 | +244.1% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 126.0 | +26.0% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 55.0 | -45.0% |
| Nkarta, Inc. (NKTX) | 100 | 12.2 | -87.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRVS vs IMVT vs RCUS vs TPVG vs NKTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRVS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +355.9% vs TPVG's +19.3%
IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 93.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
RCUS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
- 50.6% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
Among these 5 stocks, NKTX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs RCUS's -156.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs NKTX's 2.07 | |
| Dividends | 17.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +355.9% vs TPVG's +19.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.5% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
CRVS vs IMVT vs RCUS vs TPVG vs NKTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CRVS vs IMVT vs RCUS vs TPVG vs NKTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TPVG leads in 2 of 6 categories
CRVS leads 1 • IMVT leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • NKTX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS and NKTX operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $236M | $97M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$48M | -$487M | -$391M | -$22M | -$113M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | -$464M | -$369M | -$12M | -$103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | -$423M | -$489M | $35M | -$94M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +90.7% | +83.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | -168.6% | +77.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -156.4% | +50.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -2.1% | -58.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -39.3% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.4% | +19.7% | +10.5% | -2.3% | +25.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CRVS and TPVG and NKTX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $5.5B | $2.5B | $243M | $223M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $4.8B | $2.4B | $691M | $275M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -27.53x | -9.97x | -7.54x | 4.91x | -1.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 6.50x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.84x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 9.13x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 10.11x | 2.50x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 19.01x | 5.83x | 4.22x | 0.68x | 0.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -38.9% | -47.1% | -69.0% | -3.4% | -30.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.7% | -44.1% | -35.3% | -1.5% | -24.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -78.1% | — | -64.1% | +7.2% | -24.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -90.2% | -66.1% | -42.1% | +9.4% | -30.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.00x | 0.16x | 1.33x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$714M | -$123M | $449M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $714M | $222M | $20M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $937,000 | $98,000 | $99M | $469M | $80M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.29x | — | -13.38x | -1.02x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRVS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRVS five years ago would be worth $50,137 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,139 for NKTX. Over the past 12 months, CRVS leads with a +355.9% total return vs TPVG's +19.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRVS at 123.9% vs NKTX's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +99.3% | +5.1% | +6.5% | -6.3% | +68.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +355.9% | +96.1% | +209.6% | +19.3% | +68.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1022.3% | +40.9% | +24.9% | -3.4% | -31.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +401.4% | +62.4% | -18.6% | -13.5% | -88.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.1% | +173.6% | +45.9% | +93.3% | -93.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +123.9% | +12.1% | +7.7% | -1.2% | -11.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMVT and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTX's 2.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs CRVS's 54.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.37x | 1.95x | 0.83x | 2.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.95 | $30.09 | $28.72 | $7.53 | $3.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.17 | $13.36 | $7.06 | $4.48 | $1.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.1% | +90.5% | +86.3% | +79.5% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 60.2 | 60.5 | 58.3 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 1.4M | 1.2M | 504K | 802K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRVS as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", NKTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 585.7% upside for NKTX (target: $22) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30). TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 17.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.17 | $45.50 | $30.00 | $8.95 | $21.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 23 | 18 | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +17.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRVS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CRVS vs IMVT vs RCUS vs TPVG vs NKTX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRVS or IMVT or RCUS or TPVG or NKTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CRVS or IMVT or RCUS or TPVG or NKTX?
Over the past 5 years, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CRVS) delivered a total return of +401. 4%, compared to -88. 6% for Nkarta, Inc. (NKTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus NKTX's -93. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CRVS or IMVT or RCUS or TPVG or NKTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Nkarta, Inc. 's 2. 07β — meaning NKTX is approximately 149% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CRVS or IMVT or RCUS or TPVG or NKTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CRVS or IMVT or RCUS or TPVG or NKTX?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CRVS or IMVT or RCUS or TPVG or NKTX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKTX: 585.
7% to $21. 60.
07Which pays a better dividend — CRVS or IMVT or RCUS or TPVG or NKTX?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
1% yield) pays a dividend. CRVS, IMVT, RCUS, NKTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CRVS or IMVT or RCUS or TPVG or NKTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 17. 1% yield). Nkarta, Inc. (NKTX) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +93. 3%, NKTX: -93. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CRVS and IMVT and RCUS and TPVG and NKTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (CRVS (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare) and TPVG (Financial Services) and NKTX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CRVS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TPVG pays a dividend while CRVS, IMVT, RCUS, NKTX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.