Solar
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CSIQ vs FSLR vs SPWR vs JKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Solar
CSIQ vs FSLR vs SPWR vs JKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $23.42B | $875M | $310M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.60B | $5.42B | $315M | $75.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $1.67B | $-42M | $-2.52B |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 41.7% | 50.4% | 7.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.1% | 33.0% | -2.7% | -8.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.2x | 5.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $7.68B | $499M | $188M | $53.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.91B | $2.80B | $10M | $22.95B |
CSIQ vs FSLR vs SPWR vs JKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) | 100 | 46.7 | -53.3% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 30.3 | -69.7% |
| JinkoSolar Holding … (JKS) | 100 | 55.8 | -44.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CSIQ vs FSLR vs SPWR vs JKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CSIQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +88.4% vs SPWR's -42.1%
FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.8%
- 320.9% 10Y total return vs JKS's 38.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.13
- Better valuation composite
JKS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 23.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.1% revenue growth vs JKS's -30.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs SPWR's -13.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs CSIQ's 2.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 23.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.4% vs SPWR's -42.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 17.6% vs -5.3% |
CSIQ vs FSLR vs SPWR vs JKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CSIQ vs FSLR vs SPWR vs JKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories
SPWR leads 1 • CSIQ leads 0 • JKS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKS is the larger business by revenue, generating $75.2B annually — 239.0x SPWR's $315M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPWR's -13.2%. On growth, FSLR holds the edge at +23.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.6B | $5.4B | $315M | $75.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $284M | $2.2B | -$6M | -$3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | $1.7B | -$42M | -$2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.7B | $1.7B | -$15M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +41.7% | +50.4% | +7.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +33.0% | -2.7% | -8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | +30.7% | -13.2% | -3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -29.6% | +30.8% | -4.6% | -3.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.0% | +23.6% | -0.2% | -34.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +65.1% | -101.3% | -33.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SPWR and JKS each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $23.4B | $875M | $310M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.9B | $21.1B | $1.1B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.89x | 15.34x | -15.40x | -0.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.24x | 5.15x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.50x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.54x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 4.49x | 2.83x | 0.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.27x | 2.46x | — | 0.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.73x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-8 for JKS. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JKS's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs CSIQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | +18.0% | — | -7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | +12.6% | -19.5% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +17.6% | -5.3% | -9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +15.9% | -7.2% | -10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.80x | 0.05x | — | 1.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.8B | -$2.3B | $179M | $30.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $2.8B | $10M | $23.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.7B | $499M | $188M | $53.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.02x | 53.51x | -1.57x | -2.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $29,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,890 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, CSIQ leads with a +88.4% total return vs SPWR's -42.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 7.1% vs SPWR's -42.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.6% | -20.5% | -37.6% | -15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.4% | +72.0% | -42.1% | +39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.5% | +22.8% | -81.1% | -41.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.9% | +196.1% | -81.1% | -12.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | +320.9% | -81.1% | +38.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.1% | +7.1% | -42.6% | -16.1% |
Risk & Volatility
FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FSLR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSIQ's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 76.2% from its 52-week high vs SPWR's 45.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.23x | 1.39x | 2.13x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.59 | $285.99 | $2.27 | $31.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.84 | $125.80 | $0.81 | $17.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.8% | +76.2% | +45.4% | +74.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.1 | 65.6 | 47.4 | 56.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 2.2M | 1.7M | 595K |
Analyst Outlook
SPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CSIQ as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold", JKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1435.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 1.3% for JKS (target: $24). JKS is the only dividend payer here at 23.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.88 | $264.13 | $15.81 | $24.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 73 | 45 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +23.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $37.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.2% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPWR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CSIQ vs FSLR vs SPWR vs JKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CSIQ or FSLR or SPWR or JKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 9% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd. (JKS). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (12. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CSIQ or FSLR or SPWR or JKS?
On forward P/E, SunPower Inc.
is actually cheaper at 5. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CSIQ or FSLR or SPWR or JKS?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +196. 1%, compared to -81. 1% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +320. 9% versus SPWR's -81. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CSIQ or FSLR or SPWR or JKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Canadian Solar Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning CSIQ is approximately 60% more volatile than FSLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 193% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CSIQ or FSLR or SPWR or JKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -30. 9% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd. (JKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Solar, Inc. grew EPS 18. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1540. 3% for JinkoSolar Holding Co. , Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CSIQ or FSLR or SPWR or JKS?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -10. 5% for SunPower Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -11. 1% for JKS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CSIQ or FSLR or SPWR or JKS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 2x forward P/E versus 12. 2x for First Solar, Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1435. 0% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — CSIQ or FSLR or SPWR or JKS?
In this comparison, JKS (23.
1% yield) pays a dividend. CSIQ, FSLR, SPWR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CSIQ or FSLR or SPWR or JKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JinkoSolar Holding Co.
, Ltd. (JKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (23. 1% yield). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKS: +38. 3%, SPWR: -81. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CSIQ and FSLR and SPWR and JKS?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CSIQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock. JKS pays a dividend while CSIQ, FSLR, SPWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.