CSR
Centerspace
REIT - Residential
Market Cap$1.13B
5Y Perf.-4.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CSR vs BRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BRT
BRT Apartments Corp.
REIT - Residential
Market Cap$277M
5Y Perf.+30.5%
CSR vs BRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CSR | BRT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $277M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $272M | $98M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 12.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 66.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.02B | $508M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $25M |
CSR vs BRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CSR
BRT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Centerspace (CSR) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) | 100 | 130.5 | +30.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CSR vs BRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CSR leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. BRT Apartments Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CSR
Centerspace
The Real Estate Income Play
CSR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 4.5%
- Rev growth 35.3%, EPS growth 180.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, current ratio 0.27x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BRT
BRT Apartments Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play
BRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 217.9% 10Y total return vs CSR's 53.6%
- Beta 0.65, yield 7.1%, current ratio 0.86x
- 7.1% yield, vs CSR's 4.5%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CSR | 35.3% FFO/revenue growth vs BRT's 1.5% |
| Value | CSR | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | CSR | 3.1% margin vs BRT's -12.5% |
| Stability / Safety | CSR | Beta 0.29 vs BRT's 0.65, lower leverage |
| Dividends | BRT | 7.1% yield, vs CSR's 4.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CSR | +16.4% vs BRT's +2.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CSR | 0.4% ROA vs BRT's -1.7%, ROIC 4.2% vs 1.3% |
CSR vs BRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2017
CSR vs BRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCSRLAGGINGBRT
BRTBRT Apartments Corp.
0leads
CSRCenterspace
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BRTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CSR3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CSR7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CSR4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CSR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CSR and BRT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSR is the larger business by revenue, generating $272M annually — 2.8x BRT's $98M. CSR is the more profitable business, keeping 3.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRT's -12.5%. On growth, BRT holds the edge at +4.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CSRCenterspace | BRTBRT Apartments Co… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $272M | $98M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $121M | $33M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $70M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.3% | +12.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | -12.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.8% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -16.7% |
Evenly matched — CSR and BRT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CSR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CSR's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRT's 20.3x.
| Metric | CSRCenterspace | BRTBRT Apartments Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $277M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $760M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 66.19x | -22.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.91x | 20.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 2.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 1.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.64x | 25.60x |
CSR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSR delivers a 1.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-7 for BRT. CSR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRT's 2.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSR scores 5/9 vs BRT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CSRCenterspace | BRTBRT Apartments Co… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | -6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 2.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $508M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.52x | 0.51x |
CSR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSR five years ago would be worth $11,555 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,746 for BRT. Over the past 12 months, CSR leads with a +16.4% total return vs BRT's +2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSR at 8.8% vs BRT's 0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CSRCenterspace | BRTBRT Apartments Co… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.0% | +3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.4% | +2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.7% | +1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.5% | +7.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.6% | +217.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +0.3% |
CSR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSR is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BRT's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSR currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs BRT's 88.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CSRCenterspace | BRTBRT Apartments Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.61 | $16.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $52.76 | $13.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +88.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 120K | 54K |
CSR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CSR and BRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CSR as "Buy" and BRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for BRT (target: $21) vs 1.5% for CSR (target: $69). For income investors, BRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.13% vs CSR's 4.51%.
| Metric | CSRCenterspace | BRTBRT Apartments Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.50 | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +7.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.04 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +1.8% |
Evenly matched — CSR and BRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CSR leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallCenterspace (CSR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CSR vs BRT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CSR or BRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Centerspace (CSR) is the stronger pick with 35.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT). Centerspace (CSR) offers the better valuation at 66. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Centerspace (CSR) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CSR or BRT?
Over the past 5 years, Centerspace (CSR) delivered a total return of +15.
5%, compared to +7. 5% for BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRT returned +217. 9% versus CSR's +53. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CSR or BRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Centerspace (CSR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
29β versus BRT Apartments Corp. 's 0. 65β — meaning BRT is approximately 123% more volatile than CSR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Centerspace (CSR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 121% versus 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CSR or BRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Centerspace (CSR) is pulling ahead at 35.
3% versus 1. 5% for BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Centerspace grew EPS 180. 3% year-over-year, compared to -26. 9% for BRT Apartments Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRT leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CSR or BRT?
Centerspace (CSR) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
0% net margin versus -12. 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSR leads at 29. 2% versus 11. 4% for BRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSR leads at 3. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CSR or BRT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 4. 5% for Centerspace (CSR).
07Is CSR or BRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Centerspace (CSR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
29), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSR: +53. 6%, BRT: +217. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CSR and BRT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CSR is a small-cap high-growth stock; BRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CSR: -3.0% · BRT: 4.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.