Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CSW vs IIIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
CSW vs IIIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication |
| Market Cap | $4.57B | $527M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.00B | $678M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $127M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | 42.7% | 15.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | 28.5x | 16.6x |
| Total Debt | $69M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $226M | $39M |
CSW vs IIIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSW Industrials, In… (CSW) | 100 | 388.1 | +288.1% |
| Insteel Industries,… (IIIN) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CSW vs IIIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CSW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs IIIN's 48.0%
- 12.6% margin vs IIIN's 7.0%
- -9.0% vs IIIN's -18.7%
IIIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 4.1%
- Rev growth 22.4%, EPS growth 112.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 3.97x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.4% revenue growth vs CSW's 10.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.6x vs 28.5x), PEG 1.01 vs 1.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.6% margin vs IIIN's 7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs CSW's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, vs CSW's 0.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -9.0% vs IIIN's -18.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.4% ROA vs CSW's 5.6%, ROIC 14.1% vs 15.3% |
CSW vs IIIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CSW vs IIIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSW and IIIN operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $678M in trailing revenue. CSW is the more profitable business, keeping 12.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IIIN's 7.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $678M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $233M | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $127M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $162M | $439,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.7% | +15.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +7.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.3% | +23.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.3% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
IIIN leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, IIIN trades at a 61% valuation discount to CSW's 33.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IIIN offers better value at 0.78x vs CSW's 1.46x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $527M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $492M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.15x | 12.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.49x | 16.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.46x | 0.78x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.70x | 6.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.21x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.15x | 1.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.08x | 27.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIIN delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $12 for CSW. IIIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSW's 0.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSW scores 7/9 vs IIIN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.7% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.6% | +10.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.3% | +14.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.8% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$156M | -$35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $226M | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $69M | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.51x | 1192.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSW five years ago would be worth $21,008 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,796 for IIIN. Over the past 12 months, CSW leads with a -9.0% total return vs IIIN's -18.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSW at 27.7% vs IIIN's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.7% | -16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.0% | -18.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.2% | +10.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.1% | -12.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +774.5% | +48.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.7% | +3.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSW and IIIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IIIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSW's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSW currently trades 82.0% from its 52-week high vs IIIN's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $338.90 | $41.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $230.45 | $24.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.0% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 39.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 123K | 211K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CSW and IIIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CSW as "Hold" and IIIN as "Buy". For income investors, IIIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs CSW's 0.32%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $322.20 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.89 | $1.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +0.4% |
CSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). IIIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CSW vs IIIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CSW or IIIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the stronger pick with 22. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 8% for CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW). Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CSW or IIIN?
On trailing P/E, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus CSW Industrials, Inc. at 33. 1x. On forward P/E, Insteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Insteel Industries, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus CSW Industrials, Inc. 's 1. 26x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CSW or IIIN?
Over the past 5 years, CSW Industrials, Inc.
(CSW) delivered a total return of +110. 1%, compared to -12. 0% for Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSW returned +774. 5% versus IIIN's +48. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CSW or IIIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus CSW Industrials, Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning CSW is approximately 43% more volatile than IIIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 6% for CSW Industrials, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CSW or IIIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is pulling ahead at 22. 4% versus 10. 8% for CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Insteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 112. 1% year-over-year, compared to 28. 5% for CSW Industrials, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSW leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CSW or IIIN?
CSW Industrials, Inc.
(CSW) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 6% net margin versus 6. 3% for Insteel Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSW leads at 20. 6% versus 8. 4% for IIIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSW leads at 44. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CSW or IIIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus CSW Industrials, Inc. 's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 28. 5x for CSW Industrials, Inc. — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CSW or IIIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 0. 3% for CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW).
09Is CSW or IIIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IIIN: +48. 0%, CSW: +774. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CSW and IIIN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CSW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. IIIN pays a dividend while CSW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.