CTDD
Qwest Corp. 6.75% NT 57
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$19.00
5Y Perf.-26.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CTDD vs FYBR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FYBR
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$9.64B
5Y Perf.+52.4%
CTDD vs FYBR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CTDD | FYBR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $19.00 | $9.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.95B | $6.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.13B | $-381M |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 65.1% |
| Operating Margin | 31.0% | 5.3% |
| Total Debt | $1.99B | $12.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $806M |
CTDD vs FYBR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CTDD
FYBR
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwest Corp. 6.75% N… (CTDD) | 100 | 73.2 | -26.8% |
| Frontier Communicat… (FYBR) | 100 | 152.4 | +52.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTDD vs FYBR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CTDD leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CTDD
Qwest Corp. 6.75% NT 57
The Income Pick
CTDD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.74
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 16.3%, current ratio 1.35x
- 22.8% margin vs FYBR's -6.2%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FYBR
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
The Growth Play
FYBR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth -11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.5%
- 42.8% 10Y total return vs CTDD's 37.9%
- Beta 0.06, current ratio 0.55x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FYBR | 3.2% revenue growth vs CTDD's -6.9% |
| Quality / Margins | CTDD | 22.8% margin vs FYBR's -6.2% |
| Stability / Safety | FYBR | Beta 0.06 vs CTDD's 0.74 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CTDD | +22.3% vs FYBR's +5.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CTDD | 6.3% ROA vs FYBR's -1.8%, ROIC 11.3% vs 1.7% |
CTDD vs FYBR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
CTDD vs FYBR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCTDDLAGGINGFYBR
FYBRFrontier Communicatio…
2leads
CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75% NT …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FYBRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CTDD3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CTDD3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CTDD9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FYBR5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FYBR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CTDD1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTDD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FYBR and CTDD operate at a comparable scale, with $6.1B and $5.0B in trailing revenue. CTDD is the more profitable business, keeping 22.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FYBR's -6.2%. On growth, FYBR holds the edge at +4.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.0B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | -$381M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $261M | -$1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +65.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | -6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | -23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.8% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.1% |
CTDD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CTDD leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CTDD's 0.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FYBR's 10.5x.
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19 | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $20.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -29.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.70x | 10.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.00x | — |
CTDD leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTDD leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTDD delivers a 8.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-8 for FYBR. CTDD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FYBR's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTDD scores 7/9 vs FYBR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | -8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.3% | -1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.3% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.9% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $11.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $806M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $12.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 33.08x | 0.44x |
CTDD leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FYBR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FYBR five years ago would be worth $14,855 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,536 for CTDD. Over the past 12 months, CTDD leads with a +22.3% total return vs FYBR's +5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FYBR at 27.1% vs CTDD's 24.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | +1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.3% | +5.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.5% | +105.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.4% | +48.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.9% | +42.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.8% | +27.1% |
FYBR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FYBR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FYBR is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTDD's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FYBR currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs CTDD's 90.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.40 | $38.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.48 | $36.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.7% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.5 | 72.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 0 |
FYBR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CTDD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | CTDDQwest Corp. 6.75%… | FYBRFrontier Communic… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% |
CTDD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
CTDD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FYBR leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallQwest Corp. 6.75% NT 57 (CTDD)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CTDD vs FYBR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTDD or FYBR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
(FYBR) is the stronger pick with 3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Qwest Corp. 6. 75% NT 57 (CTDD). Analysts rate Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (FYBR) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CTDD or FYBR?
Over the past 5 years, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
(FYBR) delivered a total return of +48. 6%, compared to +5. 4% for Qwest Corp. 6. 75% NT 57 (CTDD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FYBR returned +42. 8% versus CTDD's +37. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CTDD or FYBR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
(FYBR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Qwest Corp. 6. 75% NT 57's 0. 74β — meaning CTDD is approximately 1052% more volatile than FYBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qwest Corp. 6. 75% NT 57 (CTDD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 2% for Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CTDD or FYBR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
(FYBR) is pulling ahead at 3. 2% versus -6. 9% for Qwest Corp. 6. 75% NT 57 (CTDD). Over a 3-year CAGR, FYBR leads at -2. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTDD or FYBR?
Qwest Corp.
6. 75% NT 57 (CTDD) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus -5. 4% for Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTDD leads at 37. 2% versus 5. 9% for FYBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTDD leads at 73. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CTDD or FYBR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CTDD or FYBR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
(FYBR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FYBR: +42. 8%, CTDD: +37. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CTDD and FYBR?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CTDD: -14.8% · FYBR: 4.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.