CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$24.72B
5Y Perf.+64.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CTRA vs EQT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
EQT
EQT Corporation
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$35.81B
5Y Perf.+330.0%
CTRA vs EQT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CTRA | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $24.72B | $35.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.48B | $10.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.67B | $3.35B |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.7% | 46.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $4.01B | $7.80B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $111M |
CTRA vs EQT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CTRA
EQT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 100 | 164.1 | +64.1% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | 100 | 430.0 | +330.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTRA vs EQT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CTRA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. EQT Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
The Income Pick
CTRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 2.8%
- 70.1% 10Y total return vs EQT's 59.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, Low D/E 27.0%, current ratio 1.19x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
EQT
EQT Corporation
The Growth Play
EQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 73.7%, EPS growth 7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.3%
- 73.7% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6%
- 33.4% margin vs CTRA's 25.7%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EQT | 73.7% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6% |
| Value | CTRA | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 11.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | EQT | 33.4% margin vs CTRA's 25.7% |
| Stability / Safety | CTRA | Beta 0.03 vs EQT's 0.23, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CTRA | 2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EQT's 1.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CTRA | +45.8% vs EQT's +8.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EQT | 8.2% ROA vs CTRA's 6.9%, ROIC 6.9% vs 10.9% |
CTRA vs EQT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
CTRA vs EQT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCTRALAGGINGEQT
EQTEQT Corporation
1leads
CTRACoterra Energy Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs EQTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EQT5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CTRA5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CTRA2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.0B annually — 1.5x CTRA's $6.5B. EQT is the more profitable business, keeping 33.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTRA's 25.7%. On growth, EQT holds the edge at +39.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.5B | $10.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.4B | $7.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $3.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +64.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | +46.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +33.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +40.8% | +40.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.3% | +39.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.3% | +5.2% |
EQT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CTRA and EQT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, CTRA trades at a 17% valuation discount to EQT's 17.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTRA's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EQT's 7.6x.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24.7B | $35.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.6B | $43.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.47x | 17.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.54x | 11.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.41x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.93x | 7.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.98x | 3.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.67x | 1.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.13x | 12.62x |
Evenly matched — CTRA and EQT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTRA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EQT delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for CTRA. CTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EQT's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EQT scores 8/9 vs CTRA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | +8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.9B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $111M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.0B | $7.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.88x | 11.47x |
CTRA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CTRA and EQT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EQT five years ago would be worth $32,654 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,893 for CTRA. Over the past 12 months, CTRA leads with a +45.8% total return vs EQT's +8.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQT at 22.5% vs CTRA's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.2% | +7.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.8% | +8.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.2% | +84.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.9% | +226.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.1% | +59.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.2% | +22.5% |
Evenly matched — CTRA and EQT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTRA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EQT's 0.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTRA currently trades 88.3% from its 52-week high vs EQT's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.03x | 0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.88 | $68.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.33 | $48.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.8 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.1M | 7.6M |
CTRA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CTRA and EQT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CTRA as "Buy" and EQT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.5% upside for CTRA (target: $34) vs -28.3% for EQT (target: $41). For income investors, CTRA offers the higher dividend yield at 2.75% vs EQT's 1.09%.
| Metric | CTRACoterra Energy In… | EQTEQT Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $41.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 55 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.90 | $0.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — CTRA and EQT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CTRA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). EQT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
Best OverallCoterra Energy Inc. (CTRA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CTRA vs EQT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTRA or EQT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EQT Corporation (EQT) is the stronger pick with 73.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTRA or EQT?
On trailing P/E, Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus EQT Corporation at 17. 3x. On forward P/E, Coterra Energy Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTRA or EQT?
Over the past 5 years, EQT Corporation (EQT) delivered a total return of +226.
5%, compared to +128. 9% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTRA returned +70. 1% versus EQT's +59. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTRA or EQT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus EQT Corporation's 0. 23β — meaning EQT is approximately 677% more volatile than CTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 29% for EQT Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTRA or EQT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EQT Corporation (EQT) is pulling ahead at 73.
7% versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EQT Corporation grew EPS 707. 3% year-over-year, compared to 49. 0% for Coterra Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EQT leads at -9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTRA or EQT?
Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 4% net margin versus 22. 5% for EQT Corporation — meaning it keeps 62. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRA leads at 89. 1% versus 34. 7% for EQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTRA leads at 60. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTRA or EQT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 7x for EQT Corporation — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTRA: 4. 5% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTRA or EQT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 1% for EQT Corporation (EQT).
09Is CTRA or EQT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 03), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTRA: +70. 1%, EQT: +59. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTRA and EQT?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTRA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EQT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CTRA: -43.3% · EQT: 39.7%)Net Margin>
%
(CTRA: 25.7% · EQT: 33.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CTRA: 14.5x · EQT: 17.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.