Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI vs HOLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI vs HOLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $38M | $1.92B | $9.35B | $16.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $674M | $1.56B | $4.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-173M | $76M | $544M |
| Gross Margin | 74.6% | 75.2% | 61.7% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | -44.2% | -27.2% | 19.9% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 32.4x | 17.2x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $290M | $559M | $2.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $103M | $152M | $1.96B |
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI vs HOLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cytosorbents Corpor… (CTSO) | 100 | 6.0 | -94.0% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| Masimo Corporation (MASI) | 100 | 74.2 | -25.8% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI vs HOLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTSO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.92
- Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 41.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.9%
- 14.5% revenue growth vs MASI's -27.1%
NVCR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MASI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 282.9% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
HOLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 52.0%, current ratio 3.75x
- Beta 0.41, current ratio 3.75x
- Lower P/E (17.2x vs 32.4x)
- 13.2% margin vs CTSO's -27.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.5% revenue growth vs MASI's -27.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.2x vs 32.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.2% margin vs CTSO's -27.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.1% vs CTSO's -31.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs CTSO's -20.3%, ROIC 9.4% vs -40.5% |
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI vs HOLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI vs HOLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
MASI leads 1 • CTSO leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NVCR and HOLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 114.3x CTSO's $36M. HOLX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTSO's -27.0%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $674M | $1.6B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | -$165M | $340M | $974M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$173M | $76M | $544M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$48M | $211M | $1000M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.6% | +75.2% | +61.7% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -44.2% | -27.2% | +19.9% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.0% | -25.7% | +4.9% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.5% | -7.1% | +13.6% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | +12.3% | +8.5% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +138.0% | -100.0% | +134.4% | -9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HOLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HOLX's 17.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MASI's 27.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38M | $1.9B | $9.3B | $17.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $62M | $2.1B | $9.8B | $17.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.60x | -13.80x | -63.75x | 30.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 32.43x | 17.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 27.74x | 17.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.07x | 2.92x | 6.12x | 4.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.99x | 5.51x | 13.41x | 3.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 47.26x | 18.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOLX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOLX delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-84 for CTSO. HOLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CTSO's 2.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs CTSO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -84.1% | -50.8% | +9.1% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.3% | -16.5% | +4.0% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.5% | -16.4% | +16.5% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.0% | -28.9% | +18.8% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.42x | 0.85x | 0.78x | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $187M | $407M | $667M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $103M | $152M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $290M | $559M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.48x | -96.80x | 12.50x | 8.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MASI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOLX five years ago would be worth $11,582 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $725 for CTSO. Over the past 12 months, HOLX leads with a +37.1% total return vs CTSO's -31.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MASI at -1.7% vs CTSO's -40.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | +28.3% | +40.1% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.0% | +1.1% | +18.9% | +37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.5% | -75.7% | -4.9% | -8.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | -91.3% | -20.4% | +15.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | +30.3% | +282.9% | +124.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.1% | -37.6% | -1.7% | -2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs CTSO's 43.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 2.15x | 0.61x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.39 | $20.06 | $179.10 | $76.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $9.82 | $125.94 | $52.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.8% | +83.9% | +99.7% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 69.8 | 63.8 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 80K | 1.5M | 1.2M | 10.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVCR as "Buy", MASI as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.50 | $187.50 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 23 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% | +4.4% |
HOLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MASI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CTSO vs NVCR vs MASI vs HOLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTSO or NVCR or MASI or HOLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cytosorbents Corporation (CTSO) is the stronger pick with 14.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -27. 1% for Masimo Corporation (MASI). Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) offers the better valuation at 30. 5x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NovoCure Limited (NVCR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTSO or NVCR or MASI or HOLX?
On forward P/E, Hologic, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 17. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTSO or NVCR or MASI or HOLX?
Over the past 5 years, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) delivered a total return of +15. 8%, compared to -92. 8% for Cytosorbents Corporation (CTSO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MASI returned +282. 5% versus CTSO's -86. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTSO or NVCR or MASI or HOLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 373% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 2% for Cytosorbents Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTSO or NVCR or MASI or HOLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cytosorbents Corporation (CTSO) is pulling ahead at 14.
5% versus -27. 1% for Masimo Corporation (MASI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Masimo Corporation grew EPS 51. 0% year-over-year, compared to -25. 0% for Hologic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVCR leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTSO or NVCR or MASI or HOLX?
Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 8% net margin versus -58. 2% for Cytosorbents Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MASI leads at 20. 5% versus -47. 2% for CTSO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTSO or NVCR or MASI or HOLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 32. 4x for Masimo Corporation — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTSO or NVCR or MASI or HOLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CTSO or NVCR or MASI or HOLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), +124. 3% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOLX: +124. 3%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTSO and NVCR and MASI and HOLX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.