Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CULP vs SGC vs HBI vs UFI vs PVH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
CULP vs SGC vs HBI vs UFI vs PVH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $46M | $188M | $2.29B | $75M | $4.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $201M | $570M | $3.44B | $555M | $8.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $9M | $330M | $-40M | $469M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 37.7% | 42.0% | 3.5% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 2.5% | 13.1% | -6.2% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.4x | 9.8x | — | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $102M | $2.55B | $116M | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $24M | $215M | $23M | $748M |
CULP vs SGC vs HBI vs UFI vs PVH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Culp, Inc. (CULP) | 100 | 46.7 | -53.3% |
| Superior Group of C… (SGC) | 100 | 119.9 | +19.9% |
| Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
| Unifi, Inc. (UFI) | 100 | 29.4 | -70.6% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CULP vs SGC vs HBI vs UFI vs PVH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, CULP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SGC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.8%
- Rev growth 0.1%, EPS growth -37.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.8%, current ratio 2.66x
- 0.1% revenue growth vs PVH's -6.1%
HBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 9.6% margin vs UFI's -7.2%
- +32.3% vs UFI's -12.6%
- 7.7% ROA vs UFI's -9.8%, ROIC 4.5% vs -2.1%
UFI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 46.4%, current ratio 3.32x
- Beta 0.31 vs HBI's 1.72, lower leverage
PVH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -1.9% 10Y total return vs SGC's -10.2%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.1% revenue growth vs PVH's -6.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs UFI's -7.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs HBI's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PVH's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.3% vs UFI's -12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.7% ROA vs UFI's -9.8%, ROIC 4.5% vs -2.1% |
CULP vs SGC vs HBI vs UFI vs PVH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CULP vs SGC vs HBI vs UFI vs PVH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PVH leads in 2 of 6 categories
CULP leads 0 • SGC leads 0 • HBI leads 0 • UFI leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HBI and PVH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 43.7x CULP's $201M. HBI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UFI's -7.2%. On growth, PVH holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $201M | $570M | $3.4B | $555M | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $26M | $496M | -$16M | $924M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $9M | $330M | -$40M | $469M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $28M | -$8M | $15M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +37.7% | +42.0% | +3.5% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +2.5% | +13.1% | -6.2% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +1.5% | +9.6% | -7.2% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +4.9% | -0.2% | +2.8% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | +2.8% | -4.8% | -11.3% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | +2.2% | +8.0% | +87.0% | +65.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PVH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, PVH trades at a 68% valuation discount to SGC's 26.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PVH's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HBI's 16.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46M | $188M | $2.3B | $75M | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58M | $266M | $4.6B | $168M | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.35x | 26.09x | -7.11x | -3.64x | 8.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.43x | 9.82x | — | 8.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.31x | 16.64x | 10.67x | 6.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | 0.33x | 0.65x | 0.13x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 0.95x | 66.99x | 0.30x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.90x | 10.11x | — | 6.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CULP and PVH each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBI delivers a 73.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $74 in annual profit, vs $-17 for UFI. CULP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBI's 75.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PVH scores 7/9 vs UFI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.3% | +4.5% | +73.9% | -16.7% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | +2.1% | +7.7% | -9.8% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.6% | +3.6% | +4.5% | -2.1% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.6% | +4.3% | +5.4% | -2.7% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.53x | 75.02x | 0.46x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $78M | $2.3B | $93M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $24M | $215M | $23M | $748M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $102M | $2.6B | $116M | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -39.03x | 2.93x | 2.15x | -4.43x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PVH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PVH five years ago would be worth $7,525 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,465 for UFI. Over the past 12 months, HBI leads with a +32.3% total return vs UFI's -12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SGC at 21.6% vs UFI's -21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | +26.2% | — | +15.4% | +30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.1% | +22.9% | +32.3% | -12.6% | +24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.4% | +80.0% | +49.1% | -52.4% | +7.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.6% | -43.1% | -66.4% | -85.3% | -24.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.0% | -10.2% | -62.6% | -84.1% | -1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.4% | +21.6% | +14.2% | -21.9% | +2.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HBI and UFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBI's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBI currently trades 91.8% from its 52-week high vs UFI's 74.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.15x | 1.72x | 0.31x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.80 | $13.78 | $7.05 | $5.42 | $100.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.93 | $8.30 | $3.96 | $2.96 | $59.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.0% | +87.1% | +91.8% | +74.5% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.8 | 67.6 | 44.3 | 61.9 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 37K | 104.2M | 28K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CULP and SGC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SGC as "Buy", HBI as "Buy", PVH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 75.0% upside for SGC (target: $21) vs 12.1% for HBI (target: $7). For income investors, SGC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.84% vs PVH's 0.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.00 | $7.25 | — | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 34 | — | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.8% | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.58 | — | — | $0.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +5.4% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +12.9% |
PVH leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
CULP vs SGC vs HBI vs UFI vs PVH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CULP or SGC or HBI or UFI or PVH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Superior Group of Companies, Inc.
(SGC) is the stronger pick with 0. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CULP or SGC or HBI or UFI or PVH?
On trailing P/E, PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Superior Group of Companies, Inc. at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, PVH Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CULP or SGC or HBI or UFI or PVH?
Over the past 5 years, PVH Corp.
(PVH) delivered a total return of -24. 8%, compared to -85. 3% for Unifi, Inc. (UFI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PVH returned -1. 9% versus UFI's -84. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CULP or SGC or HBI or UFI or PVH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Unifi, Inc.
(UFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Hanesbrands Inc. 's 1. 72β — meaning HBI is approximately 452% more volatile than UFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Culp, Inc. (CULP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 75% for Hanesbrands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CULP or SGC or HBI or UFI or PVH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Superior Group of Companies, Inc.
(SGC) is pulling ahead at 0. 1% versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Unifi, Inc. grew EPS 57. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1698. 4% for Hanesbrands Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SGC leads at -0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CULP or SGC or HBI or UFI or PVH?
PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -9. 1% for Hanesbrands Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PVH leads at 8. 5% versus -4. 2% for CULP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PVH leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CULP or SGC or HBI or UFI or PVH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PVH Corp.
(PVH) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SGC: 75. 0% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CULP or SGC or HBI or UFI or PVH?
In this comparison, SGC (4.
8% yield), PVH (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CULP, HBI, UFI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CULP or SGC or HBI or UFI or PVH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Unifi, Inc.
(UFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31)). Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UFI: -84. 1%, HBI: -62. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CULP and SGC and HBI and UFI and PVH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CULP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SGC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UFI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock. SGC pays a dividend while CULP, HBI, UFI, PVH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.