Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CULP vs UFI vs LAKE vs SGC vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
CULP vs UFI vs LAKE vs SGC vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $46M | $75M | $106M | $188M | $295M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $201M | $555M | $193M | $570M | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-40M | $-38M | $9M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 3.5% | 34.8% | 37.7% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | -6.2% | -7.2% | 2.5% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 20.4x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $116M | $32M | $102M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $23M | $17M | $24M | $40M |
CULP vs UFI vs LAKE vs SGC vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Culp, Inc. (CULP) | 100 | 46.7 | -53.3% |
| Unifi, Inc. (UFI) | 100 | 29.4 | -70.6% |
| Lakeland Industries… (LAKE) | 100 | 74.8 | -25.2% |
| Superior Group of C… (SGC) | 100 | 119.9 | +19.9% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 555.5 | +455.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CULP vs UFI vs LAKE vs SGC vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, CULP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
UFI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 46.4%, current ratio 3.32x
- Beta 0.31 vs FLXS's 1.51
LAKE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 34.1% revenue growth vs CULP's -5.4%
SGC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.8%
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.8%, current ratio 2.66x
- 4.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs LAKE's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs LAKE's 34.0%
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 20.4x)
- 4.8% margin vs LAKE's -19.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.1% revenue growth vs CULP's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs LAKE's -19.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs FLXS's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs LAKE's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.1% vs LAKE's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs LAKE's -17.0%, ROIC 9.9% vs -5.1% |
CULP vs UFI vs LAKE vs SGC vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CULP vs UFI vs LAKE vs SGC vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLXS leads in 3 of 6 categories
CULP leads 0 • UFI leads 0 • LAKE leads 0 • SGC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SGC is the larger business by revenue, generating $570M annually — 2.9x LAKE's $193M. FLXS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAKE's -19.4%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $201M | $555M | $193M | $570M | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | -$16M | -$11M | $26M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$40M | -$38M | $9M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $15M | -$16M | $28M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +3.5% | +34.8% | +37.7% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | -6.2% | -7.2% | +2.5% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -7.2% | -19.4% | +1.5% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +2.8% | -8.2% | +4.9% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.2% | -11.3% | +4.0% | +2.8% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | +87.0% | -165.0% | +2.2% | -27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UFI and FLXS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 40% valuation discount to SGC's 26.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SGC's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UFI's 10.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46M | $75M | $106M | $188M | $295M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58M | $168M | $120M | $266M | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.35x | -3.64x | -4.46x | 26.09x | 15.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 20.43x | 11.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.67x | — | 10.31x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | 0.13x | 0.64x | 0.33x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 0.30x | 0.55x | 0.95x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 11.90x | 8.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-28 for LAKE. LAKE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SGC's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs UFI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.3% | -16.7% | -27.9% | +4.5% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | -9.8% | -17.0% | +2.1% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.6% | -2.1% | -5.1% | +3.6% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -10.6% | -2.7% | -5.9% | +4.3% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.46x | 0.22x | 0.53x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $93M | $14M | $78M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $23M | $17M | $24M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $116M | $32M | $102M | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -39.03x | -4.43x | -23.38x | 2.93x | 380.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,465 for UFI. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs LAKE's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs UFI's -21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | +15.4% | +22.5% | +26.2% | +38.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.1% | -12.6% | -33.3% | +22.9% | +80.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.4% | -52.4% | -4.0% | +80.0% | +242.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.6% | -85.3% | -58.3% | -43.1% | +19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.0% | -84.1% | +34.0% | -10.2% | +51.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.4% | -21.9% | -1.3% | +21.6% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UFI and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLXS's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs LAKE's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.31x | 1.35x | 1.15x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.80 | $5.42 | $20.50 | $13.78 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.93 | $2.96 | $7.15 | $8.30 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.0% | +74.5% | +52.9% | +87.1% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.8 | 61.9 | 50.8 | 67.6 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 28K | 100K | 37K | 47K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CULP and SGC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LAKE as "Buy", SGC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 75.0% upside for SGC (target: $21) vs -2.1% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, SGC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.84% vs LAKE's 1.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.00 | $21.00 | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 9 | 3 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | +4.8% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.12 | $0.58 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.2% | +0.4% | +5.4% | +1.0% |
FLXS leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
CULP vs UFI vs LAKE vs SGC vs FLXS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CULP or UFI or LAKE or SGC or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is the stronger pick with 34. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Culp, Inc. (CULP). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CULP or UFI or LAKE or SGC or FLXS?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Superior Group of Companies, Inc. at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CULP or UFI or LAKE or SGC or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -85. 3% for Unifi, Inc. (UFI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +51. 4% versus UFI's -84. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CULP or UFI or LAKE or SGC or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Unifi, Inc.
(UFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning FLXS is approximately 387% more volatile than UFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 53% for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CULP or UFI or LAKE or SGC or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lakeland Industries, Inc.
(LAKE) is pulling ahead at 34. 1% versus -5. 4% for Culp, Inc. (CULP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -437. 5% for Lakeland Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LAKE leads at 12. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CULP or UFI or LAKE or SGC or FLXS?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -10. 8% for Lakeland Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLXS leads at 6. 0% versus -5. 5% for LAKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAKE leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CULP or UFI or LAKE or SGC or FLXS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SGC: 75. 0% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CULP or UFI or LAKE or SGC or FLXS?
In this comparison, SGC (4.
8% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield), LAKE (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. CULP, UFI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CULP or UFI or LAKE or SGC or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Unifi, Inc.
(UFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31)). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UFI: -84. 1%, FLXS: +51. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CULP and UFI and LAKE and SGC and FLXS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CULP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UFI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAKE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SGC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. LAKE, SGC, FLXS pay a dividend while CULP, UFI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.