Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CULP vs UFI vs MHK vs APOG vs AWI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CULP
Culp, Inc.

Apparel - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$46M
5Y Perf.-53.3%
UFI
Unifi, Inc.

Apparel - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$75M
5Y Perf.-70.6%
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.29B
5Y Perf.+10.2%
APOG
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$787M
5Y Perf.+77.1%
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.05B
5Y Perf.+119.0%

CULP vs UFI vs MHK vs APOG vs AWI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CULP logoCULP
UFI logoUFI
MHK logoMHK
APOG logoAPOG
AWI logoAWI
IndustryApparel - ManufacturersApparel - ManufacturersFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesConstructionConstruction
Market Cap$46M$75M$6.29B$787M$7.05B
Revenue (TTM)$201M$555M$10.99B$1.40B$1.65B
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$-40M$414M$54M$306M
Gross Margin13.0%3.5%24.3%22.7%40.3%
Operating Margin1.0%-6.2%4.9%6.7%27.5%
Forward P/E11.2x10.6x19.9x
Total Debt$18M$116M$2.76B$286M$532M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$23M$856M$40M$113M

CULP vs UFI vs MHK vs APOG vs AWILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CULP
UFI
MHK
APOG
AWI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Culp, Inc. (CULP)10046.7-53.3%
Unifi, Inc. (UFI)10029.4-70.6%
Mohawk Industries, … (MHK)100110.2+10.2%
Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG)100177.1+77.1%
Armstrong World Ind… (AWI)100219.0+119.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CULP vs UFI vs MHK vs APOG vs AWI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AWI leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Apogee Enterprises, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. UFI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CULP
Culp, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

CULP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
UFI
Unifi, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

UFI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 46.4%, current ratio 3.32x
  • Beta 0.31, current ratio 3.32x
  • Beta 0.31 vs MHK's 1.34
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, MHK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
APOG
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
The Income Pick

APOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
  • Lower P/E (10.6x vs 19.9x)
  • 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs AWI's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
  • 330.4% 10Y total return vs APOG's 10.5%
  • 12.1% revenue growth vs CULP's -5.4%
  • 18.6% margin vs UFI's -7.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAWI logoAWI12.1% revenue growth vs CULP's -5.4%
ValueAPOG logoAPOGLower P/E (10.6x vs 19.9x)
Quality / MarginsAWI logoAWI18.6% margin vs UFI's -7.2%
Stability / SafetyUFI logoUFIBeta 0.31 vs MHK's 1.34
DividendsAPOG logoAPOG2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs AWI's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)AWI logoAWI+11.5% vs UFI's -12.6%
Efficiency (ROA)AWI logoAWI16.0% ROA vs UFI's -9.8%, ROIC 24.9% vs -2.1%

CULP vs UFI vs MHK vs APOG vs AWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CULPCulp, Inc.
FY 2024
Mattress Fabrics
53.4%$114M
Upholstery Fabrics
46.6%$99M
UFIUnifi, Inc.
FY 2025
Third Party Manufacturer
49.6%$567M
All Other Products And Services
34.7%$396M
R E P R E V E Fiber
15.3%$175M
Service
0.4%$4M
MHKMohawk Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Global Ceramic Segment
43.5%$4.2B
Carpet And Resilient
38.5%$3.7B
Laminate and Wood
18.1%$1.8B
APOGApogee Enterprises, Inc.
FY 2026
Architectural Metals Segment
35.4%$504M
Architectural Services segment
30.8%$439M
Architectural
19.9%$284M
Performance Surfaces
13.9%$198M
AWIArmstrong World Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Mineral Fiber
63.6%$1.0B
Architectural Specialties
36.4%$590M

CULP vs UFI vs MHK vs APOG vs AWI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAWILAGGINGMHK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MHK is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 54.8x CULP's $201M. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UFI's -7.2%. On growth, MHK holds the edge at +8.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.UFI logoUFIUnifi, Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$201M$555M$11.0B$1.4B$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$3M-$16M$1.2B$57M$603M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M-$40M$414M$54M$306M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$11M$15M$709M$95M$247M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.0%+3.5%+24.3%+22.7%+40.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.0%-6.2%+4.9%+6.7%+27.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.6%-7.2%+3.8%+3.9%+18.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.7%+2.8%+6.5%+6.8%+15.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.2%-11.3%+8.0%+1.6%+7.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.2%+87.0%+65.2%+6.1%-1.9%
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

UFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.5x trailing earnings, APOG trades at a 38% valuation discount to AWI's 23.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MHK's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APOG's 21.9x.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.UFI logoUFIUnifi, Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
Market CapShares × price$46M$75M$6.3B$787M$7.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$58M$168M$8.2B$1.0B$7.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.35x-3.64x17.33x14.52x23.32x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.23x10.64x19.87x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.67x7.05x21.95x17.23x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.21x0.13x0.58x0.56x4.35x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.78x0.30x0.77x1.53x7.99x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.20x8.27x28.63x
UFI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-17 for UFI. CULP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWI's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs UFI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.UFI logoUFIUnifi, Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-13.3%-16.7%+5.0%+10.8%+34.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.9%-9.8%+3.0%+4.8%+16.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-9.6%-2.1%+3.9%+8.1%+24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-10.6%-2.7%+4.8%+9.7%+26.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–931679
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.31x0.46x0.33x0.56x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$12M$93M$1.9B$247M$419M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$23M$856M$40M$113M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$18M$116M$2.8B$286M$532M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-39.03x-4.43x36.90x5.97x13.31x
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AWI five years ago would be worth $16,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,465 for UFI. Over the past 12 months, AWI leads with a +11.5% total return vs UFI's -12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.0% vs UFI's -21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.UFI logoUFIUnifi, Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+2.6%+15.4%-6.2%-1.3%-16.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-9.1%-12.6%+1.9%-2.8%+11.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.4%-52.4%+2.9%-0.1%+151.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.6%-85.3%-55.3%+12.9%+63.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-76.0%-84.1%-47.6%+10.5%+330.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.4%-21.9%+0.9%-0.0%+36.0%
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — UFI and AWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

UFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MHK's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AWI currently trades 80.1% from its 52-week high vs MHK's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.UFI logoUFIUnifi, Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x0.31x1.34x1.25x0.82x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.80$5.42$143.13$49.99$206.08
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.93$2.96$93.60$30.75$148.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.0%+74.5%+71.8%+73.2%+80.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10066.861.950.653.641.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded29K28K1.1M253K494K
Evenly matched — UFI and AWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MHK as "Hold", APOG as "Hold", AWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.7% upside for APOG (target: $71) vs 19.6% for AWI (target: $198). For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs AWI's 0.77%.

MetricCULP logoCULPCulp, Inc.UFI logoUFIUnifi, Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$130.00$70.50$197.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts32626
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises320148
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.04$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+0.2%+2.4%+1.9%+1.8%
APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AWI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UFI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallArmstrong World Industries,… (AWI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CULP vs UFI vs MHK vs APOG vs AWI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CULP or UFI or MHK or APOG or AWI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Culp, Inc. (CULP). Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CULP or UFI or MHK or APOG or AWI?

On trailing P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

(APOG) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Armstrong World Industries, Inc. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CULP or UFI or MHK or APOG or AWI?

Over the past 5 years, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) delivered a total return of +63. 0%, compared to -85. 3% for Unifi, Inc. (UFI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWI returned +330. 4% versus UFI's -84. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CULP or UFI or MHK or APOG or AWI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Unifi, Inc.

(UFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Mohawk Industries, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MHK is approximately 330% more volatile than UFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Culp, Inc. (CULP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 59% for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CULP or UFI or MHK or APOG or AWI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -5. 4% for Culp, Inc. (CULP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Unifi, Inc. grew EPS 57. 5% year-over-year, compared to -37. 8% for Culp, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWI leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CULP or UFI or MHK or APOG or AWI?

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus -9. 0% for Culp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus -4. 2% for CULP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CULP or UFI or MHK or APOG or AWI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

(APOG) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. — 9. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APOG: 92. 7% to $70. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CULP or UFI or MHK or APOG or AWI?

In this comparison, APOG (2.

8% yield), AWI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CULP, UFI, MHK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CULP or UFI or MHK or APOG or AWI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 8% yield, +330. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +330. 4%, MHK: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CULP and UFI and MHK and APOG and AWI?

These companies operate in different sectors (CULP (Consumer Cyclical) and UFI (Consumer Cyclical) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and APOG (Industrials) and AWI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CULP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UFI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. APOG, AWI pay a dividend while CULP, UFI, MHK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CULP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UFI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MHK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APOG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AWI

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CULP and UFI and MHK and APOG and AWI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CULP: -8.2% · UFI: -11.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.