Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CVRX vs LFST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
CVRX vs LFST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $192M | $3.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $1.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-52M | $23M |
| Gross Margin | 85.0% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | -90.0% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 121.1x |
| Total Debt | $51M | $194M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $249M |
CVRX vs LFST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVRx, Inc. (CVRX) | 100 | 26.1 | -73.9% |
| LifeStance Health G… (LFST) | 100 | 31.8 | -68.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVRX vs LFST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, CVRX is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
LFST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.20
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.3%
- -59.6% 10Y total return vs CVRX's -73.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% revenue growth vs CVRX's 10.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.6% margin vs CVRX's -92.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs CVRX's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.6% vs CVRX's -2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs CVRX's -46.7%, ROIC 1.2% vs -256.7% |
CVRX vs LFST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LFST leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LFST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 26.7x CVRX's $56M. LFST is the more profitable business, keeping 1.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVRX's -92.9%. On growth, LFST holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$50M | $100M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$52M | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | $179M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.0% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -90.0% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -92.9% | +1.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -69.7% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | +21.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
LFST leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $192M | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $167M | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.59x | 442.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 121.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 41.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.38x | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.86x | 2.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 31.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LFST leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LFST delivers a 1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-108 for CVRX. LFST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CVRX's 1.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LFST scores 7/9 vs CVRX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -108.3% | +1.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -46.7% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.9% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.29x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | -$55M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $249M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $51M | $194M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.79x | 3.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LFST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LFST five years ago would be worth $4,041 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,614 for CVRX. Over the past 12 months, LFST leads with a +60.6% total return vs CVRX's -2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LFST at 1.4% vs CVRX's -15.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.1% | +27.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.1% | +60.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.4% | +4.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.9% | -59.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.9% | -59.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.8% | +1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
LFST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LFST is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVRX's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LFST currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs CVRX's 64.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.30 | $8.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.30 | $3.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.2 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CVRX as "Buy" and LFST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.1% upside for CVRX (target: $12) vs 5.1% for LFST (target: $9).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.50 | $9.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LFST leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
CVRX vs LFST: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVRX or LFST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LifeStance Health Group, Inc.
(LFST) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for CVRx, Inc. (CVRX). LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) offers the better valuation at 442. 5x trailing P/E (121. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CVRx, Inc. (CVRX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CVRX or LFST?
Over the past 5 years, LifeStance Health Group, Inc.
(LFST) delivered a total return of -59. 6%, compared to -73. 9% for CVRx, Inc. (CVRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LFST returned -59. 6% versus CVRX's -73. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CVRX or LFST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LifeStance Health Group, Inc.
(LFST) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus CVRx, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning CVRX is approximately 37% more volatile than LFST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LifeStance Health Group, Inc. (LFST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 129% for CVRx, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CVRX or LFST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LifeStance Health Group, Inc.
(LFST) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus 10. 4% for CVRx, Inc. (CVRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LifeStance Health Group, Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to 23. 0% for CVRx, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVRX leads at 36. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CVRX or LFST?
LifeStance Health Group, Inc.
(LFST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 7% net margin versus -94. 1% for CVRx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LFST leads at 1. 8% versus -90. 5% for CVRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVRX leads at 85. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CVRX or LFST more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVRX: 57.
1% to $11. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — CVRX or LFST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CVRX or LFST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LifeStance Health Group, Inc.
(LFST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20)). CVRx, Inc. (CVRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LFST: -59. 6%, CVRX: -73. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CVRX and LFST?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.