Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CWBC logo
CWBC
PFBC logo
PFBC
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CWBC vs PFBC vs JPM vs KO vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CWBC
Community West Bancshares

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$494M
5Y Perf.+205.8%
PFBC
Preferred Bank

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.+137.1%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

CWBC vs PFBC vs JPM vs KO vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CWBC logoCWBC
PFBC logoPFBC
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-AlcoholicInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$494M$1.24B$896.00B$355.61B$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$194M$503M$280.33B$49.28B$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$38M$134M$57.05B$13.70B$2.67B
Gross Margin72.5%55.3%60.0%61.7%37.6%
Operating Margin27.1%37.7%25.9%29.3%17.9%
Forward P/E11.9x9.6x14.4x25.3x6.2x
Total Debt$143M$384M$942.38B$45.49B$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$119M$807M$343.34B$10.27B$599M

CWBC vs PFBC vs JPM vs KO vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CWBC
PFBC
JPM
KO
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Community West Banc… (CWBC)100305.8+205.8%
Preferred Bank (PFBC)100237.1+137.1%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CWBC vs PFBC vs JPM vs KO vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CWBC and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. FIS and PFBC also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CWBC
Community West Bancshares
The Banking Pick

CWBC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 344.4%
  • NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • 18.5% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
  • +40.9% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
PFBC
Preferred Bank
The Banking Pick

PFBC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 2.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
  • Beta 0.55, yield 2.9%, current ratio 149.60x
  • Beta 0.55 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs CWBC's 304.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs CWBC's 19.7%
  • 13.1% ROA vs CWBC's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.26 vs CWBC's 2.76
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCWBC logoCWBC18.5% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs CWBC's 19.7%
Stability / SafetyPFBC logoPFBCBeta 0.55 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)CWBC logoCWBC+40.9% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs CWBC's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0%

CWBC vs PFBC vs JPM vs KO vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
CWBCCommunity West Bancshares
FY 2025
Banking Operations
100.0%$196M
PFBCPreferred Bank

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

CWBC vs PFBC vs JPM vs KO vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGPFBC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FIS leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1445.5x CWBC's $194M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWBC's 19.7%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…PFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$194M$503M$280.3B$49.3B$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$56M$191M$81.4B$15.5B$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$38M$134M$57.0B$13.7B$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$44M$167M$100.9B$12.6B$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+72.5%+55.3%+60.0%+61.7%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.1%+37.7%+25.9%+29.3%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.7%+26.6%+20.4%+27.8%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+22.5%+33.2%+36.0%+25.5%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+61.1%+24.0%+16.0%+18.2%+30.6%
FIS leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PFBC and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.8x trailing earnings, PFBC trades at a 81% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFBC offers better value at 0.56x vs CWBC's 2.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…PFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$494M$1.2B$896.0B$355.6B$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$517M$814M$1.50T$390.8B$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.88x9.76x16.00x27.18x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.89x9.56x14.40x25.27x6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.99x0.56x0.90x2.43x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.85x4.30x18.36x26.39x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.54x2.48x3.20x7.42x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.20x1.65x2.47x10.40x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.32x7.42x8.88x67.15x7.21x
Evenly matched — PFBC and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for CWBC. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CWBC scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…PFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.8%+17.3%+15.9%+41.1%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+1.8%+1.3%+13.1%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.0%+13.5%+4.5%+15.8%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.6%+4.4%+8.9%+17.3%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–986576
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.35x0.49x2.60x1.33x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$24M-$423M$599.0B$35.2B$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$119M$807M$343.3B$10.3B$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$143M$384M$942.4B$45.5B$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.06x0.88x0.74x10.70x21.16x
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CWBC leads with a +40.9% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…PFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.9%+7.6%-0.5%+20.3%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+40.9%+24.3%+21.8%+17.2%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+132.6%+104.2%+138.2%+47.0%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+117.4%+71.1%+118.2%+65.6%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+304.9%+275.3%+465.8%+121.1%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+32.5%+26.9%+33.6%+13.7%-6.8%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CWBC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWBC currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…PFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.78x0.55x0.94x-0.20x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.80$103.05$337.25$84.04$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.98$79.60$262.71$65.35$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.8%+98.6%+95.1%+98.3%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.169.859.160.630.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded254K93K7.0M12.7M5.6M
Evenly matched — CWBC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KO and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CWBC as "Buy", PFBC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 0.4% for PFBC (target: $102). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricCWBC logoCWBCCommunity West Ba…PFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankJPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.75$102.00$339.75$86.13$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts410614837
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+2.9%+1.9%+2.5%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0515561
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.48$2.98$5.95$2.04$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+7.5%+3.9%+0.2%+7.0%
Evenly matched — KO and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CWBC vs PFBC vs JPM vs KO vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CWBC or PFBC or JPM or KO or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is the stronger pick with 18.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Community West Bancshares (CWBC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CWBC or PFBC or JPM or KO or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the cheapest at 9.

8x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Community West Bancshares's 2. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CWBC or PFBC or JPM or KO or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CWBC or PFBC or JPM or KO or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CWBC or PFBC or JPM or KO or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is pulling ahead at 18.

5% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Community West Bancshares grew EPS 344. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CWBC or PFBC or JPM or KO or FIS?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFBC leads at 38. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWBC leads at 72. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CWBC or PFBC or JPM or KO or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Community West Bancshares's 2. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CWBC or PFBC or JPM or KO or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

09

Is CWBC or PFBC or JPM or KO or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CWBC and PFBC and JPM and KO and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (CWBC (Financial Services) and PFBC (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CWBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.