Regulated Water
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CWCO vs GEV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
CWCO vs GEV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Water | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $527M | $300.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $132M | $39.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $9.38B |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | 139015.1% | 3.9% |
| Forward P/E | 31.5x | 40.3x |
| Total Debt | $708.60B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $123.79T | $8.85B |
CWCO vs GEV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated Water … (CWCO) | 100 | 112.8 | +12.8% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 818.3 | +718.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CWCO vs GEV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CWCO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 6.12x
- Beta 0.76, yield 100.0%, current ratio 6.12x
GEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 217.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 7.5% 10Y total return vs CWCO's 152.8%
- 8.9% revenue growth vs CWCO's -1.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% revenue growth vs CWCO's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.5x vs 40.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs CWCO's 13.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs GEV's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GEV's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +179.3% vs CWCO's +44.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs CWCO's 0.0%, ROIC 27.9% vs 26.6% |
CWCO vs GEV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CWCO vs GEV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CWCO and GEV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.4B annually — 298.1x CWCO's $132M. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWCO's 13.9%. On growth, GEV holds the edge at +16.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $132M | $39.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25.98T | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $9.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $33.67T | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +19.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +139015.1% | +3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +254916.5% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +16.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.5% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CWCO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $527M | $300.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$123.08T | $291.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 63.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.49x | 40.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -4.74x | 130.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.99x | 7.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 25.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.00x | 81.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $0 for CWCO. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEV scores 6/9 vs CWCO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | 0.0% | +79.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | 0.0% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.6% | +27.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.0% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$123.08T | -$8.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $123.79T | $8.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $708.6B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $85,407 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $29,492 for CWCO. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +179.3% total return vs CWCO's +44.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 104.4% vs CWCO's 26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.3% | +64.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +179.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.7% | +754.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +194.9% | +754.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +152.8% | +754.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.1% | +104.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CWCO and GEV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEV's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs CWCO's 84.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.12 | $1181.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.69 | $387.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.5% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 162K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CWCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CWCO as "Buy" and GEV as "Buy". CWCO is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1119.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $497756.41 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% |
CWCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). GEV leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
CWCO vs GEV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CWCO or GEV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) offers the better valuation at 63. 3x trailing P/E (40. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CWCO or GEV?
On forward P/E, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. is actually cheaper at 31. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CWCO or GEV?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +754. 1%, compared to +194. 9% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +754. 1% versus CWCO's +152. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CWCO or GEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus GE Vernova Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning GEV is approximately 131% more volatile than CWCO relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CWCO or GEV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWCO leads at 12. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CWCO or GEV?
Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 9% net margin versus 12. 8% for GE Vernova Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus 3. 6% for GEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWCO leads at 36. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CWCO or GEV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) trades at 31. 5x forward P/E versus 40. 3x for GE Vernova Inc. — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CWCO or GEV?
In this comparison, CWCO (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. GEV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CWCO or GEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 100. 0% yield, +152. 8% 10Y return). GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWCO: +152. 8%, GEV: +754. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CWCO and GEV?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock. CWCO pays a dividend while GEV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.