Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CX vs FYBR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CX
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.

Construction Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • MX
Market Cap$1.96B
5Y Perf.+63.6%
FYBR
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.64B
5Y Perf.+52.4%

CX vs FYBR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CX logoCX
FYBR logoFYBR
IndustryConstruction MaterialsTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$1.96B$9.64B
Revenue (TTM)$16.18B$6.11B
Net Income (TTM)$963M$-381M
Gross Margin31.4%65.1%
Operating Margin10.0%5.3%
Forward P/E16.8x
Total Debt$7.65B$12.03B
Cash & Equiv.$1.82B$806M

CX vs FYBRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CX
FYBR
StockMay 21May 26Return
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.… (CX)100163.6+63.6%
Frontier Communicat… (FYBR)100152.4+52.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CX vs FYBR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CX leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CX
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.
The Income Pick

CX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 6.5%
  • Rev growth -0.1%, EPS growth 9.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
  • 110.4% 10Y total return vs FYBR's 42.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FYBR
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

FYBR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.06, current ratio 0.55x
  • 3.2% revenue growth vs CX's -0.1%
  • Beta 0.06 vs CX's 1.17
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFYBR logoFYBR3.2% revenue growth vs CX's -0.1%
Quality / MarginsCX logoCX6.0% margin vs FYBR's -6.2%
Stability / SafetyFYBR logoFYBRBeta 0.06 vs CX's 1.17
DividendsCX logoCX6.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CX logoCX+120.3% vs FYBR's +5.5%
Efficiency (ROA)CX logoCX3.4% ROA vs FYBR's -1.8%, ROIC 6.3% vs 1.7%

CX vs FYBR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CXCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.

Segment breakdown not available.

FYBRFrontier Communications Parent, Inc.
FY 2024
Data And Internet Services
67.5%$4.0B
Voice Services
21.0%$1.2B
Video Services
5.9%$344M
Other Customer Revenues
5.7%$335M

CX vs FYBR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCXLAGGINGFYBR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CX is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.2B annually — 2.7x FYBR's $6.1B. CX is the more profitable business, keeping 6.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FYBR's -6.2%. On growth, CX holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCX logoCXCEMEX, S.A.B. de …FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$16.2B$6.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.9B$2.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$963M-$381M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.0B-$1.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+31.4%+65.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.0%+5.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.0%-6.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.2%-23.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.2%+4.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-84.3%+9.1%
CX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CX leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CX's 2.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FYBR's 10.5x.

MetricCX logoCXCEMEX, S.A.B. de …FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…
Market CapShares × price$2.0B$9.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.8B$20.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS2.05x-29.61x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.83x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.68x10.55x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.12x1.62x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.14x1.93x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1.94x
CX leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

CX delivers a 7.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-8 for FYBR. CX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FYBR's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CX scores 7/9 vs FYBR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCX logoCXCEMEX, S.A.B. de …FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.1%-8.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.4%-1.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.3%+1.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.5%+1.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.56x2.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.8B$11.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.8B$806M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7.6B$12.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.29x0.44x
CX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CX five years ago would be worth $15,975 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,821 for FYBR. Over the past 12 months, CX leads with a +120.3% total return vs FYBR's +5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CX at 28.0% vs FYBR's 27.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCX logoCXCEMEX, S.A.B. de …FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.3%+1.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+120.3%+5.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+109.5%+105.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+59.7%+48.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.4%+42.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+28.0%+27.1%
CX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FYBR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FYBR is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CX's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricCX logoCXCEMEX, S.A.B. de …FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.17x0.06x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.67$38.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.94$36.04
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.1%+100.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.572.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6.3M0
FYBR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates CX as "Buy" and FYBR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 0.8% upside for CX (target: $14) vs -10.8% for FYBR (target: $34). CX is the only dividend payer here at 6.51% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCX logoCXCEMEX, S.A.B. de …FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.66$34.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts2311
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.88
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.7%
CX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CX leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FYBR leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallCEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CX vs FYBR: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CX or FYBR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.

(FYBR) is the stronger pick with 3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for CEMEX, S. A. B. de C. V. (CX). CEMEX, S. A. B. de C. V. (CX) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CEMEX, S. A. B. de C. V. (CX) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — CX or FYBR?

Over the past 5 years, CEMEX, S.

A. B. de C. V. (CX) delivered a total return of +59. 7%, compared to +48. 2% for Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (FYBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CX returned +110. 4% versus FYBR's +42. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — CX or FYBR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.

(FYBR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus CEMEX, S. A. B. de C. V. 's 1. 17β — meaning CX is approximately 1724% more volatile than FYBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CEMEX, S. A. B. de C. V. (CX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 2% for Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — CX or FYBR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.

(FYBR) is pulling ahead at 3. 2% versus -0. 1% for CEMEX, S. A. B. de C. V. (CX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CEMEX, S. A. B. de C. V. grew EPS 982. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1183. 3% for Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CX leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — CX or FYBR?

CEMEX, S.

A. B. de C. V. (CX) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 0% net margin versus -5. 4% for Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CX leads at 10. 0% versus 5. 9% for FYBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FYBR leads at 64. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is CX or FYBR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CX: 0.

8% to $13. 66.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CX or FYBR?

In this comparison, CX (6.

5% yield) pays a dividend. FYBR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is CX or FYBR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.

(FYBR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FYBR: +42. 8%, CX: +110. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CX and FYBR?

These companies operate in different sectors (CX (Basic Materials) and FYBR (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CX is a small-cap deep-value stock; FYBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CX pays a dividend while FYBR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FYBR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CX and FYBR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CX: 9.2% · FYBR: 4.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.