Software - Application
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Staffing & Employment Services
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $3M | $1.43B | $1.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $32M | $4.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-157M | $159M |
| Gross Margin | 83.5% | 15.4% | 17.7% |
| Operating Margin | -351.0% | -5.6% | 5.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $21M | $979M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $106M | $1.98B |
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CXApp Inc. (CXAI) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Enovix Corporation (ENVX) | 100 | 44.9 | -55.1% |
| TriNet Group, Inc. (TNET) | 100 | 52.8 | -47.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CXAI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ENVX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 37.9%, EPS growth 40.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 37.9% revenue growth vs CXAI's -3.0%
- +13.0% vs CXAI's -86.3%
TNET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 2.6%
- 152.6% 10Y total return vs ENVX's -45.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 1.09x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.9% revenue growth vs CXAI's -3.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs ENVX's -492.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs ENVX's 3.40 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.0% vs CXAI's -86.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs CXAI's -41.7% |
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TNET leads in 3 of 6 categories
ENVX leads 1 • CXAI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNET leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNET is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 1203.5x CXAI's $4M. TNET is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENVX's -4.9%. On growth, ENVX holds the edge at +15.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $32M | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$142M | $372M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$157M | $159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$114M | $330M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.5% | +15.4% | +17.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | -5.6% | +5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -4.9% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -3.6% | +6.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +15.9% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.1% | +20.0% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CXAI and ENVX and TNET each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $1.4B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $1.3B | $954M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | -9.17x | 13.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 9.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 2.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 44.89x | 0.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 5.21x | 37.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 6.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNET leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TNET delivers a 179.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $180 in annual profit, vs $-78 for CXAI. ENVX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TNET's 18.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TNET scores 6/9 vs CXAI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.0% | -0.1% | +179.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.7% | -0.0% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -52.9% | -74.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -59.1% | -27.5% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.08x | 18.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $708,000 | -$85M | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $106M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $21M | $979M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.39x | -7.03x | 5.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNET five years ago would be worth $5,667 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $159 for CXAI. Over the past 12 months, ENVX leads with a +13.0% total return vs CXAI's -86.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVX at -18.4% vs CXAI's -75.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.8% | -12.8% | -24.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.3% | +13.0% | -46.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -45.6% | -51.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -47.6% | -43.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -45.2% | +152.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.3% | -18.4% | -21.2% |
Risk & Volatility
TNET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNET is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVX's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TNET currently trades 48.9% from its 52-week high vs CXAI's 10.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.90x | 3.40x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.45 | $16.49 | $86.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $4.62 | $33.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.9% | +41.7% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.0 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.3M | 5.7M | 451K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ENVX as "Buy", TNET as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 158.0% upside for ENVX (target: $18) vs 61.6% for TNET (target: $69). TNET is the only dividend payer here at 2.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.75 | $68.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.1% | +9.4% |
TNET leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ENVX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CXAI vs ENVX vs TNET: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CXAI or ENVX or TNET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enovix Corporation (ENVX) is the stronger pick with 37.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for CXApp Inc. (CXAI). TriNet Group, Inc. (TNET) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enovix Corporation (ENVX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CXAI or ENVX or TNET?
Over the past 5 years, TriNet Group, Inc.
(TNET) delivered a total return of -43. 3%, compared to -98. 4% for CXApp Inc. (CXAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TNET returned +152. 6% versus CXAI's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CXAI or ENVX or TNET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriNet Group, Inc.
(TNET) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Enovix Corporation's 3. 40β — meaning ENVX is approximately 309% more volatile than TNET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enovix Corporation (ENVX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 18% for TriNet Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CXAI or ENVX or TNET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enovix Corporation (ENVX) is pulling ahead at 37.
9% versus -3. 0% for CXApp Inc. (CXAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CXApp Inc. grew EPS 74. 0% year-over-year, compared to -7. 9% for TriNet Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENVX leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CXAI or ENVX or TNET?
TriNet Group, Inc.
(TNET) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus -492. 6% for Enovix Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TNET leads at 5. 3% versus -557. 0% for ENVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CXAI leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CXAI or ENVX or TNET more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENVX: 158.
0% to $17. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — CXAI or ENVX or TNET?
In this comparison, TNET (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. CXAI, ENVX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CXAI or ENVX or TNET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriNet Group, Inc.
(TNET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 2. 6% yield, +152. 6% 10Y return). CXApp Inc. (CXAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TNET: +152. 6%, CXAI: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CXAI and ENVX and TNET?
These companies operate in different sectors (CXAI (Technology) and ENVX (Industrials) and TNET (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CXAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENVX is a small-cap high-growth stock; TNET is a small-cap deep-value stock. TNET pays a dividend while CXAI, ENVX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.