CXDO
Crexendo, Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.+64.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CXDO vs MGIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$853M
5Y Perf.+70.9%
CXDO vs MGIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | CXDO | MGIC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $317M | $853M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $73M | $603M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $40M |
| Gross Margin | 71.5% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | 26.0x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $113M |
CXDO vs MGIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CXDO
MGIC
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) | 100 | 164.4 | +64.4% |
| Magic Software Ente… (MGIC) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CXDO vs MGIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MGIC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Crexendo, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CXDO
Crexendo, Inc.
The Income Pick
CXDO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.86
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 186.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.0%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs MGIC's 222.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
The Defensive Pick
MGIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.46, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.62x
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 26.0x)
- 6.6% margin vs CXDO's 6.1%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CXDO | 12.0% revenue growth vs MGIC's 3.3% |
| Value | MGIC | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 26.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | MGIC | 6.6% margin vs CXDO's 6.1% |
| Stability / Safety | MGIC | Beta 1.46 vs CXDO's 1.86 |
| Dividends | MGIC | 1.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CXDO | +86.3% vs MGIC's +28.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MGIC | 7.4% ROA vs CXDO's 5.7%, ROIC 16.2% vs 10.2% |
CXDO vs MGIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2021
CXDO vs MGIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCXDOLAGGINGMGIC
MGICMagic Software Enterp…
1leads
CXDOCrexendo, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MGICMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MGIC6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CXDO5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CXDO6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CXDO and MGIC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $603M annually — 8.3x CXDO's $73M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.6% (MGIC) to 6.1% (CXDO). On growth, CXDO holds the edge at +29.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CXDOCrexendo, Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $73M | $603M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $87M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $64M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.5% | +28.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +10.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.0% | +13.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.9% | +17.6% |
Evenly matched — CXDO and MGIC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MGIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.2x trailing earnings, MGIC trades at a 62% valuation discount to CXDO's 61.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGIC's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CXDO's 35.9x.
| Metric | CXDOCrexendo, Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $853M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $287M | $827M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 61.13x | 23.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.96x | 14.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.91x | 10.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.65x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.85x | 2.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.17x | 11.64x |
MGIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CXDO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGIC delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for CXDO. CXDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGIC's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CXDO scores 7/9 vs MGIC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CXDOCrexendo, Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +16.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $113M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $86M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 283.68x | 11.90x |
CXDO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CXDO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CXDO five years ago would be worth $18,242 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,445 for MGIC. Over the past 12 months, CXDO leads with a +86.3% total return vs MGIC's +28.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CXDO at 84.4% vs MGIC's 10.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CXDOCrexendo, Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.5% | -33.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.3% | +28.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +526.9% | +36.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.4% | +24.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +636.8% | +222.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +84.4% | +10.9% |
CXDO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CXDO and MGIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGIC is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CXDO's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CXDO currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs MGIC's 62.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CXDOCrexendo, Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 1.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.84 | $28.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.07 | $13.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.4% | +62.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 84.3 | 30.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 243K | 34K |
Evenly matched — CXDO and MGIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CXDO as "Buy" and MGIC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.4% upside for MGIC (target: $19) vs 2.2% for CXDO (target: $10). MGIC is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CXDOCrexendo, Inc. | MGICMagic Software En… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $18.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CXDO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MGIC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallCrexendo, Inc. (CXDO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CXDO vs MGIC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CXDO or MGIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC). Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CXDO or MGIC?
On trailing P/E, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus Crexendo, Inc. at 61. 1x. On forward P/E, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CXDO or MGIC?
Over the past 5 years, Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) delivered a total return of +82. 4%, compared to +24. 4% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CXDO returned +636. 8% versus MGIC's +222. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CXDO or MGIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 46β versus Crexendo, Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning CXDO is approximately 27% more volatile than MGIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 29% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CXDO or MGIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus 3. 3% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Crexendo, Inc. grew EPS 186. 2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CXDO leads at 22. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CXDO or MGIC?
Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 6. 7% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGIC leads at 11. 1% versus 6. 9% for CXDO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CXDO leads at 62. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CXDO or MGIC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) trades at 15. 0x forward P/E versus 26. 0x for Crexendo, Inc. — 11. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGIC: 6. 4% to $18. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CXDO or MGIC?
In this comparison, MGIC (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CXDO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CXDO or MGIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 2% yield, +222. 0% 10Y return). Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGIC: +222. 0%, CXDO: +636. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CXDO and MGIC?
These companies operate in different sectors (CXDO (Communication Services) and MGIC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
MGIC pays a dividend while CXDO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(CXDO: 29.0% · MGIC: 13.1%)Net Margin>
%
(CXDO: 6.1% · MGIC: 6.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(CXDO: 61.1x · MGIC: 23.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.