Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CYN logo
CYN
MVST logo
MVST
JPM logo
JPM
BAC logo
BAC
SES logo
SES
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CYN vs MVST vs JPM vs BAC vs SES

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CYN
Cyngn Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
MVST
Microvast Holdings, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$376M
5Y Perf.-86.6%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+88.8%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$422.78B
5Y Perf.+17.2%
SES
SES AI Corporation

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$345M
5Y Perf.-89.6%

CYN vs MVST vs JPM vs BAC vs SES — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CYN logoCYN
MVST logoMVST
JPM logoJPM
BAC logoBAC
SES logoSES
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationElectrical Equipment & PartsBanks - DiversifiedBanks - DiversifiedAuto - Parts
Market Cap$14M$376M$896.00B$422.78B$345M
Revenue (TTM)$276K$372M$280.33B$191.57B$22M
Net Income (TTM)$-26M$-43M$57.05B$30.51B$-73M
Gross Margin34.4%26.4%60.0%56.1%36.3%
Operating Margin-99.2%-4.6%25.9%19.7%-352.3%
Forward P/E10.3x14.4x12.6x
Total Debt$7M$186M$942.38B$365.90B$8M
Cash & Equiv.$990K$105M$343.34B$231.84B$30M

CYN vs MVST vs JPM vs BAC vs SESLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CYN
MVST
JPM
BAC
SES
StockOct 21Jun 26Return
Cyngn Inc. (CYN)1000.0-100.0%
Microvast Holdings,… (MVST)10013.4-86.6%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100188.8+88.8%
Bank of America Cor… (BAC)100117.2+17.2%
SES AI Corporation (SES)10010.4-89.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CYN vs MVST vs JPM vs BAC vs SES

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Bank of America Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. MVST and SES also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CYN
Cyngn Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CYN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.18, Low D/E 17.6%, current ratio 8.29x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
MVST
Microvast Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

MVST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs BAC's 368.2%
  • PEG 0.81 vs BAC's 0.82
  • NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
  • 20.4% margin vs CYN's -94.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
The Banking Pick

BAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.3%
  • Beta 0.86, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.42x
  • Beta 0.86 vs SES's 3.28
  • +28.1% vs MVST's -73.1%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
SES
SES AI Corporation
The Growth Leader

SES is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 9.3% revenue growth vs CYN's -40.5%
Best for: growth
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSES logoSES9.3% revenue growth vs CYN's -40.5%
ValueMVST logoMVSTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs CYN's -94.2%
Stability / SafetyBAC logoBACBeta 0.86 vs SES's 3.28
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BAC's 2.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BAC logoBAC+28.1% vs MVST's -73.1%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs CYN's -48.1%, ROIC 4.5% vs -117.2%

CYN vs MVST vs JPM vs BAC vs SES — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Battery Storage Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Battery Storage Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
CYNCyngn Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MVSTMicrovast Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
BACBank of America Corporation
FY 2024
Loans and Leases
32.2%$62.0B
other interest income
14.7%$28.3B
Debt securities
13.5%$26.0B
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
10.3%$19.9B
Investment And Brokerage Services
9.2%$17.8B
Market making and similar activities
6.7%$13.0B
Trading account assets
5.4%$10.4B
Other (4)
7.8%$15.1B
SESSES AI Corporation
FY 2025
Service
64.7%$14M
Product
35.3%$7M

CYN vs MVST vs JPM vs BAC vs SES — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGSES

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1014240.4x CYN's $276,397. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CYN's -94.2%. On growth, CYN holds the edge at +121.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCYN logoCYNCyngn Inc.MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…SES logoSESSES AI Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$276,397$372M$280.3B$191.6B$22M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$26M$65M$81.4B$40.0B-$67M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$26M-$43M$57.0B$30.5B-$73M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$27M$33M$100.9B$12.6B-$58M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+34.4%+26.4%+60.0%+56.1%+36.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-99.2%-4.6%+25.9%+19.7%-3.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-94.2%-11.5%+20.4%+15.9%-3.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-97.1%+8.8%+36.0%+6.6%-2.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+121.8%-48.0%+15.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+91.1%+2.0%+16.0%+18.3%-6.1%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MVST leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 8% valuation discount to JPM's 16.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs BAC's 0.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCYN logoCYNCyngn Inc.MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…SES logoSESSES AI Corporation
Market CapShares × price$14M$376M$896.0B$422.8B$345M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$19M$457M$1.50T$556.8B$324M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.24x-12.56x16.00x14.66x-4.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.27x14.40x12.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x0.95x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.21x18.36x13.92x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue62.34x0.88x3.20x2.21x16.44x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.15x0.89x2.47x1.39x1.65x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.71x8.88x33.52x
MVST leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CYN. SES carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs CYN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCYN logoCYNCyngn Inc.MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…SES logoSESSES AI Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-59.6%-10.8%+15.9%+10.1%-32.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-48.1%-4.3%+1.3%+0.9%-26.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-117.2%+5.4%+4.5%+3.5%-35.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-71.5%+7.1%+8.9%+4.5%-29.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936574
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.45x2.60x1.21x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6M$81M$599.0B$134.1B-$21M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$990,023$105M$343.3B$231.8B$30M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7M$186M$942.4B$365.9B$8M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-59.79x-8.74x0.74x0.48x
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for CYN. Over the past 12 months, BAC leads with a +28.1% total return vs MVST's -73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs CYN's -95.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCYN logoCYNCyngn Inc.MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…SES logoSESSES AI Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-54.9%-59.9%-0.5%+1.1%-44.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-72.6%-73.1%+21.8%+28.1%+7.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-23.6%+138.2%+103.0%-49.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-91.4%+118.2%+47.1%-89.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-88.4%+465.8%+368.2%-90.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-95.5%-8.6%+33.6%+26.6%-20.3%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SES's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs CYN's 3.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCYN logoCYNCyngn Inc.MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…SES logoSESSES AI Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.18x2.52x0.94x0.86x3.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$41.54$7.12$337.25$57.55$3.73
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.22$1.07$262.71$43.66$0.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+3.0%+15.9%+95.1%+97.3%+28.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.034.559.168.343.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded277K4.3M7.0M31.7M8.8M
BAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MVST as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", SES as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 324.8% upside for MVST (target: $5) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.26% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricCYN logoCYNCyngn Inc.MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…SES logoSESSES AI Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.80$339.75$61.13$1.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts661544
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises21512
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%+5.1%+0.5%
Evenly matched — JPM and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MVST leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CYN vs MVST vs JPM vs BAC vs SES: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CYN or MVST or JPM or BAC or SES a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SES AI Corporation (SES) is the stronger pick with 929.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -40. 5% for Cyngn Inc. (CYN). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CYN or MVST or JPM or BAC or SES?

On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.

7x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Microvast Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Bank of America Corporation's 0. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CYN or MVST or JPM or BAC or SES?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Cyngn Inc. (CYN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CYN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CYN or MVST or JPM or BAC or SES?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

86β versus SES AI Corporation's 3. 28β — meaning SES is approximately 279% more volatile than BAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SES AI Corporation (SES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CYN or MVST or JPM or BAC or SES?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SES AI Corporation (SES) is pulling ahead at 929.

4% versus -40. 5% for Cyngn Inc. (CYN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Microvast Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MVST leads at 27. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CYN or MVST or JPM or BAC or SES?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -107. 2% for Cyngn Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -117. 3% for CYN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CYN or MVST or JPM or BAC or SES more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Bank of America Corporation's 0. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVST: 324. 8% to $4. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CYN or MVST or JPM or BAC or SES?

In this comparison, BAC (2.

3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. CYN, MVST, SES do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CYN or MVST or JPM or BAC or SES better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

86), 2. 3% yield, +368. 2% 10Y return). Cyngn Inc. (CYN) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BAC: +368. 2%, CYN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CYN and MVST and JPM and BAC and SES?

These companies operate in different sectors (CYN (Technology) and MVST (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and SES (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CYN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; SES is a small-cap high-growth stock. JPM, BAC pay a dividend while CYN, MVST, SES do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.