Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CYRX vs FDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
CYRX vs FDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $637M | $88.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $183M | $91.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $77M | $4.48B |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 24.4% |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $231M | $37.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250M | $5.50B |
CYRX vs FDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
| FedEx Corporation (FDX) | 100 | 288.9 | +188.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CYRX vs FDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CYRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs FDX's 156.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.84, Low D/E 45.9%, current ratio 2.17x
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.1x)
FDX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 0.3%, EPS growth -2.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.0%
- Beta 1.03, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.3% revenue growth vs CYRX's -24.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 42.2% margin vs FDX's 4.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs CYRX's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +129.1% vs FDX's +79.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.3% ROA vs FDX's 5.0%, ROIC -5.1% vs 7.7% |
CYRX vs FDX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CYRX vs FDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CYRX and FDX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FDX is the larger business by revenue, generating $91.9B annually — 502.5x CYRX's $183M. CYRX is the more profitable business, keeping 42.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FDX's 4.9%. On growth, CYRX holds the edge at +16.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $183M | $91.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $10.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $77M | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.2% | +24.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.2% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +42.2% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.7% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.5% | +8.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.7% | +15.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CYRX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, CYRX trades at a 60% valuation discount to FDX's 22.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $637M | $88.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $617M | $120.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.06x | 22.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.62x | 1.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 3.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CYRX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CYRX delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $16 for FDX. CYRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FDX's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FDX scores 5/9 vs CYRX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | +15.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.3% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $31.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250M | $5.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $231M | $37.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -16.64x | 16.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CYRX and FDX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FDX five years ago would be worth $12,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,061 for CYRX. Over the past 12 months, CYRX leads with a +129.1% total return vs FDX's +79.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FDX at 19.5% vs CYRX's -17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.7% | +29.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +129.1% | +79.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.8% | +70.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.4% | +29.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +578.6% | +156.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.0% | +19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CYRX and FDX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FDX is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CYRX's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CYRX currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs FDX's 93.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.10 | $404.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.31 | $212.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.7 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 457K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
FDX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CYRX as "Buy" and FDX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -1.5% upside for CYRX (target: $13) vs -3.4% for FDX (target: $364). FDX is the only dividend payer here at 1.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.50 | $364.19 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +3.4% |
CYRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FDX leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
CYRX vs FDX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CYRX or FDX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FedEx Corporation (FDX) is the stronger pick with 0.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 5% for Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX). Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CYRX or FDX?
On trailing P/E, Cryoport, Inc.
(CYRX) is the cheapest at 9. 1x versus FedEx Corporation at 22. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CYRX or FDX?
Over the past 5 years, FedEx Corporation (FDX) delivered a total return of +29.
0%, compared to -79. 4% for Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CYRX returned +578. 6% versus FDX's +156. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CYRX or FDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FedEx Corporation (FDX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
03β versus Cryoport, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning CYRX is approximately 80% more volatile than FDX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 133% for FedEx Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CYRX or FDX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FedEx Corporation (FDX) is pulling ahead at 0.
3% versus -24. 5% for Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cryoport, Inc. grew EPS 163. 3% year-over-year, compared to -2. 3% for FedEx Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FDX leads at -2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CYRX or FDX?
Cryoport, Inc.
(CYRX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus 4. 7% for FedEx Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FDX leads at 6. 9% versus -20. 9% for CYRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CYRX leads at 47. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CYRX or FDX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CYRX: -1.
5% to $12. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CYRX or FDX?
In this comparison, FDX (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. CYRX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CYRX or FDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FedEx Corporation (FDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
03), 1. 5% yield, +156. 2% 10Y return). Cryoport, Inc. (CYRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FDX: +156. 2%, CYRX: +578. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CYRX and FDX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CYRX is a small-cap deep-value stock; FDX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. FDX pays a dividend while CYRX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.