Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Restaurants
CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $307M | $206M | $22.48B | $264M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $173M | $90M | $11.66B | $1.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $37M | $14M | $2.67B | $-69M |
| Gross Margin | 63.3% | 54.7% | 37.6% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 7.0% | 17.0% | -2.8% |
| Forward P/E | 8.2x | 11.8x | 6.9x | 4.0x |
| Total Debt | $309M | $52M | $4.01B | $3.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $119M | $599M | $52M |
CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citizens Financial … (CZFS) | 100 | 128.9 | +28.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 291.2 | +191.2% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
| Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CZFS is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
CZWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 1.7%
- 161.7% 10Y total return vs CZFS's 77.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.45, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth -47.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- PEG 0.28 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 5.4% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- 22.9% margin vs JACK's -5.2%
JACK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 11.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs JACK's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs JACK's 1.71 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs JACK's 6.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.0% vs JACK's -49.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs JACK's -2.7%, ROIC 6.0% vs -0.6% |
CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 2 • JACK leads 1 • CZFS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 129.4x CZWI's $90M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JACK's -5.2%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $173M | $90M | $11.7B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $9M | $3.4B | $16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $37M | $14M | $2.7B | -$69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $35M | $11M | $2.7B | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.3% | +54.7% | +37.6% | +27.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +7.0% | +17.0% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +16.0% | +22.9% | -5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +11.5% | +23.6% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +30.1% | -25.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.3% | +63.0% | +30.6% | +33.7% |
Valuation Metrics
JACK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, CZFS trades at a 86% valuation discount to FIS's 58.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CZFS offers better value at 2.11x vs CZWI's 2.89x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $307M | $206M | $22.5B | $264M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $578M | $139M | $25.9B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.37x | 14.66x | 58.00x | -3.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.17x | 11.76x | 6.94x | 4.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.11x | 2.89x | 2.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.82x | 15.63x | 7.11x | 82.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.77x | 2.29x | 2.11x | 0.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 1.11x | 1.62x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.70x | 19.85x | 8.00x | 3.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZFS's 0.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs JACK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.4% | +7.8% | +18.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.8% | +7.5% | -2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +2.0% | +6.0% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +0.6% | +6.6% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | 0.28x | 0.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $271M | -$67M | $3.4B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $119M | $599M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $309M | $52M | $4.0B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.74x | 0.16x | 15.37x | -0.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,303 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,698 for JACK. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +46.0% total return vs JACK's -49.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 38.4% vs JACK's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.5% | +24.0% | -33.0% | -26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.9% | +46.0% | -42.1% | -49.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.2% | +165.0% | -13.3% | -81.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.2% | +73.0% | -65.1% | -83.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.7% | +161.7% | -18.4% | -59.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.6% | +38.4% | -4.6% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
CZWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JACK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZWI currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs JACK's 46.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.45x | 0.65x | 1.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.61 | $22.62 | $82.74 | $29.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $49.99 | $12.83 | $43.28 | $8.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +94.6% | +52.6% | +46.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 64.4 | 50.8 | 60.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 40K | 5.6M | 838K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CZWI and JACK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZFS as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JACK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.3% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 44.5% for JACK (target: $20). For income investors, JACK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.29% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $67.14 | $19.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 2 | 37 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +1.7% | +3.8% | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.99 | $0.37 | $1.63 | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +3.0% | +6.3% | +1.9% |
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CZWI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?
On trailing P/E, Citizens Financial Services, Inc.
(CZFS) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 58. 0x. On forward P/E, Jack in the Box Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 28x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +73. 0%, compared to -83. 0% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +161. 7% versus JACK's -59. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Jack in the Box Inc. 's 1. 71β — meaning JACK is approximately 277% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 92% for Citizens Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Citizens Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 31. 6% year-over-year, compared to -127. 6% for Jack in the Box Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIS leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?
Citizens Financial Services, Inc.
(CZFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus -5. 5% for Jack in the Box Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZFS leads at 26. 0% versus -1. 2% for JACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CZFS leads at 63. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 28x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 54. 3% to $67. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) offers the highest yield at 6. 3%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 7% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +161. 7%, JACK: -59. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CZFS and CZWI and FIS and JACK?
These companies operate in different sectors (CZFS (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JACK (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CZFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.