Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CZFS
Citizens Financial Services, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$307M
5Y Perf.+28.9%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$206M
5Y Perf.+191.2%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$22.48B
5Y Perf.-68.7%
JACK
Jack in the Box Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$264M
5Y Perf.-79.4%

CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CZFS logoCZFS
CZWI logoCZWI
FIS logoFIS
JACK logoJACK
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesRestaurants
Market Cap$307M$206M$22.48B$264M
Revenue (TTM)$173M$90M$11.66B$1.35B
Net Income (TTM)$37M$14M$2.67B$-69M
Gross Margin63.3%54.7%37.6%27.6%
Operating Margin26.0%7.0%17.0%-2.8%
Forward P/E8.2x11.8x6.9x4.0x
Total Debt$309M$52M$4.01B$3.12B
Cash & Equiv.$38M$119M$599M$52M

CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CZFS
CZWI
FIS
JACK
StockMay 20May 26Return
Citizens Financial … (CZFS)100128.9+28.9%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100291.2+191.2%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10031.3-68.7%
Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK)10020.6-79.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CZWI and FIS are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. JACK also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CZFS
Citizens Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZFS is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
Best for: bank quality
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 1.7%
  • 161.7% 10Y total return vs CZFS's 77.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.45, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Growth Play

FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth -47.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
  • PEG 0.28 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • 5.4% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
  • 22.9% margin vs JACK's -5.2%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
JACK
Jack in the Box Inc.
The Value Play

JACK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (4.0x vs 11.8x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFIS logoFIS5.4% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueJACK logoJACKLower P/E (4.0x vs 11.8x)
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs JACK's -5.2%
Stability / SafetyCZWI logoCZWIBeta 0.45 vs JACK's 1.71
DividendsCZWI logoCZWI1.7% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs JACK's 6.3%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+46.0% vs JACK's -49.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs JACK's -2.7%, ROIC 6.0% vs -0.6%

CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CZFSCitizens Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Community Banking Member
100.0%$174M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
JACKJack in the Box Inc.
FY 2025
Restaurant Sales
42.8%$627M
Franchise
25.2%$369M
Royalty
15.2%$222M
Advertising
14.8%$217M
Technology Service
1.4%$20M
Franchise Fees
0.7%$11M

CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCZWILAGGINGCZFS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 129.4x CZWI's $90M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JACK's -5.2%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCZFS logoCZFSCitizens Financia…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$173M$90M$11.7B$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$45M$9M$3.4B$16M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$37M$14M$2.7B-$69M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$35M$11M$2.7B-$10M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.3%+54.7%+37.6%+27.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.0%+7.0%+17.0%-2.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.1%+16.0%+22.9%-5.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.3%+11.5%+23.6%-0.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%-25.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+31.3%+63.0%+30.6%+33.7%
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JACK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.4x trailing earnings, CZFS trades at a 86% valuation discount to FIS's 58.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CZFS offers better value at 2.11x vs CZWI's 2.89x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCZFS logoCZFSCitizens Financia…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
Market CapShares × price$307M$206M$22.5B$264M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$578M$139M$25.9B$3.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.37x14.66x58.00x-3.28x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.17x11.76x6.94x4.02x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.11x2.89x2.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.82x15.63x7.11x82.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.77x2.29x2.11x0.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.91x1.11x1.62x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.70x19.85x8.00x3.56x
JACK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZFS's 0.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs JACK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCZFS logoCZFSCitizens Financia…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.4%+7.8%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.2%+0.8%+7.5%-2.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.4%+2.0%+6.0%-0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.0%+0.6%+6.6%-0.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95664
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.92x0.28x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$271M-$67M$3.4B$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$38M$119M$599M$52M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$309M$52M$4.0B$3.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.74x0.16x15.37x-0.51x
FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,303 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,698 for JACK. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +46.0% total return vs JACK's -49.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 38.4% vs JACK's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCZFS logoCZFSCitizens Financia…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.5%+24.0%-33.0%-26.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+15.9%+46.0%-42.1%-49.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-13.2%+165.0%-13.3%-81.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+25.2%+73.0%-65.1%-83.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+77.7%+161.7%-18.4%-59.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.6%+38.4%-4.6%-42.8%
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CZWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JACK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZWI currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs JACK's 46.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCZFS logoCZFSCitizens Financia…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.66x0.45x0.65x1.71x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$69.61$22.62$82.74$29.40
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$49.99$12.83$43.28$8.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.7%+94.6%+52.6%+46.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.664.450.860.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K40K5.6M838K
CZWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CZWI and JACK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CZFS as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JACK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.3% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 44.5% for JACK (target: $20). For income investors, JACK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.29% vs CZWI's 1.73%.

MetricCZFS logoCZFSCitizens Financia…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…JACK logoJACKJack in the Box I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$67.14$19.92
# AnalystsCovering analysts223741
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%+1.7%+3.8%+6.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises5710
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.99$0.37$1.63$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+3.0%+6.3%+1.9%
Evenly matched — CZWI and JACK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CZWI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallCitizens Community Bancorp,… (CZWI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CZFS vs CZWI vs FIS vs JACK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?

On trailing P/E, Citizens Financial Services, Inc.

(CZFS) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 58. 0x. On forward P/E, Jack in the Box Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 28x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?

Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) delivered a total return of +73. 0%, compared to -83. 0% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +161. 7% versus JACK's -59. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Jack in the Box Inc. 's 1. 71β — meaning JACK is approximately 277% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 92% for Citizens Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Citizens Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 31. 6% year-over-year, compared to -127. 6% for Jack in the Box Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIS leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?

Citizens Financial Services, Inc.

(CZFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus -5. 5% for Jack in the Box Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZFS leads at 26. 0% versus -1. 2% for JACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CZFS leads at 63. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 28x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 54. 3% to $67. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) offers the highest yield at 6. 3%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).

09

Is CZFS or CZWI or FIS or JACK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 7% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +161. 7%, JACK: -59. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CZFS and CZWI and FIS and JACK?

These companies operate in different sectors (CZFS (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JACK (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CZFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CZFS

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CZWI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIS

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JACK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CZFS and CZWI and FIS and JACK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CZFS: 2.7% · CZWI: -9.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(CZFS: 21.1% · CZWI: 16.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CZFS: 8.4x · CZWI: 14.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.