Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DAAQ vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs CIFR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Financial - Capital Markets
DAAQ vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs CIFR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $178M | $10.09B | $5.37B | $4.23B | $9.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $653M | $868M | $740M | $175M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-867M | $-2.04B | $-501M | $-898M |
| Gross Margin | — | -13.6% | 0.3% | 19.2% | 14.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -125.0% | 16.9% | -24.5% | -195.0% |
| Forward P/E | 27.9x | — | — | 14.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $280M | $3.65B | $824M | $2.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $234M | $547M | $43M | $628M |
DAAQ vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs CIFR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Asset Acqui… (DAAQ) | 100 | 95.6 | -4.4% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | 100 | 235.5 | +135.5% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) | 100 | 149.4 | +49.4% |
| Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) | 100 | 512.6 | +412.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAAQ vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs CIFR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAAQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 2.6% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 2.6% margin vs CIFR's -5.1%
- 4.8% ROA vs MARA's -28.0%, ROIC -0.3% vs -9.0%
RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 4.14
MARA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 3.32 vs CIFR's 4.19, lower leverage
CLSK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.62, Low D/E 37.9%, current ratio 4.18x
- Beta 3.62, yield 0.2%, current ratio 4.18x
- 102.2% revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2%
CIFR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 147.5% 10Y total return vs RIOT's 7.3%
- +5.4% vs MARA's -11.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 102.2% revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.6% margin vs CIFR's -5.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 3.32 vs CIFR's 4.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs MARA's -11.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs MARA's -28.0%, ROIC -0.3% vs -9.0% |
DAAQ vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs CIFR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DAAQ vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs CIFR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAAQ leads in 1 of 6 categories
CIFR leads 1 • RIOT leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • CLSK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MARA and CLSK each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA and DAAQ operate at a comparable scale, with $868M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -67.7% (CLSK) to -5.1% (CIFR).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $653M | $868M | $740M | $175M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$450M | $953M | $244M | -$203M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$867M | -$2.0B | -$501M | -$898M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$1.0B | -$385M | -$1.1B | -$930M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -13.6% | +0.3% | +19.2% | +14.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -125.0% | +16.9% | -24.5% | -195.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -132.8% | -2.3% | -67.7% | -5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -156.7% | -44.4% | -144.9% | -5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | -24.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -60.0% | -113.5% | -2.1% | -154.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DAAQ and RIOT and CLSK each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, CLSK trades at a 47% valuation discount to DAAQ's 27.9x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178M | $10.1B | $5.4B | $4.2B | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $177M | $10.1B | $8.5B | $5.0B | $12.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.92x | -13.65x | -3.82x | 14.71x | -11.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 7.51x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 15.58x | 5.92x | 5.52x | 44.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 3.17x | 1.44x | 2.41x | 11.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAAQ leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DAAQ delivers a 5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-116 for CIFR. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIFR's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSK scores 5/9 vs CIFR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | -28.8% | -51.7% | -29.9% | -115.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | -21.5% | -28.0% | -16.0% | -24.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | -8.7% | -9.0% | +10.3% | -11.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | -11.0% | -12.1% | +13.7% | -15.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x | 1.05x | 0.38x | 3.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $46M | $3.1B | $781M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $234M | $547M | $43M | $628M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $280M | $3.6B | $824M | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -16.47x | 12.66x | -15.45x | -32.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIFR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIFR five years ago would be worth $24,549 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,703 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, CIFR leads with a +538.0% total return vs MARA's -11.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIFR at 116.3% vs DAAQ's -3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | +87.9% | +42.1% | +42.7% | +51.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.0% | +160.6% | -11.0% | +69.7% | +538.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.0% | +159.9% | +50.9% | +338.3% | +912.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.0% | -24.8% | -53.0% | -15.7% | +145.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.0% | +734.1% | -66.0% | -82.2% | +147.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.5% | +37.5% | +14.7% | +63.7% | +116.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DAAQ and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAAQ is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 4.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs MARA's 60.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.12x | 4.14x | 3.32x | 3.62x | 4.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.70 | $28.94 | $23.45 | $23.61 | $28.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.10 | $8.87 | $6.66 | $8.00 | $3.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +91.9% | +60.0% | +69.8% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 56.8 | 53.5 | 53.9 | 51.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49K | 17.9M | 41.5M | 21.7M | 24.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RIOT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy", CIFR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.2% upside for CIFR (target: $32) vs -11.2% for MARA (target: $13). CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.25 | $12.50 | $18.90 | $31.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 20 | 11 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.9% | +3.4% | +0.9% |
DAAQ leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). CIFR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
DAAQ vs RIOT vs MARA vs CLSK vs CIFR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAAQ or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or CIFR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAAQ or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or CIFR?
On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. at 27. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAAQ or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or CIFR?
Over the past 5 years, Cipher Mining Inc.
(CIFR) delivered a total return of +145. 5%, compared to -53. 0% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +734. 1% versus CLSK's -82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAAQ or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or CIFR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.
(DAAQ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 12β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 4. 19β — meaning CIFR is approximately -3631% more volatile than DAAQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAAQ or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or CIFR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Asset Acquisition Corp. grew EPS 31. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAAQ or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or CIFR?
CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -150. 7% for CIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLSK leads at 41. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — DAAQ or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or CIFR?
In this comparison, CLSK (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. DAAQ, RIOT, MARA, CIFR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is DAAQ or RIOT or MARA or CLSK or CIFR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Digital Asset Acquisition Corp.
(DAAQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 12)). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAAQ: -10. 0%, CLSK: -82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between DAAQ and RIOT and MARA and CLSK and CIFR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DAAQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RIOT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIFR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.