DAIO vs FORM

For growth investors, FormFactor, Inc.

(FORM) is the stronger pick with 2. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Data I/O Corporation (DAIO). FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) offers the better valuation at 209. 7x trailing P/E (60. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) a "Hold" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, FormFactor, Inc.

(FORM) delivered a total return of +273. 9%, compared to -47. 7% for Data I/O Corporation (DAIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +1997% versus DAIO's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Data I/O Corporation (DAIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

64β versus FormFactor, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning FORM is approximately 222% more volatile than DAIO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 21% for Data I/O Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FormFactor, Inc.

(FORM) is pulling ahead at 2. 8% versus -1. 2% for Data I/O Corporation (DAIO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FormFactor, Inc. grew EPS -22. 5% year-over-year, compared to -55. 9% for Data I/O Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FORM leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

FormFactor, Inc.

(FORM) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -23. 2% for Data I/O Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FORM leads at 8. 2% versus -23. 8% for DAIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DAIO leads at 49. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Data I/O Corporation (DAIO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

64)). FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAIO: +12. 0%, FORM: +1997%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.