Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DBVT vs ALKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
DBVT vs ALKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1669.52T | $6.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-168M | $242M |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $194M | $1.12B |
DBVT vs ALKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.2 | -59.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 221.6 | +121.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DBVT vs ALKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26
- +110.7% vs ALKS's +15.4%
ALKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -5.2%, EPS growth -34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.9%
- -4.6% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -87.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.2% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.4% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs DBVT's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.7% vs ALKS's +15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.5% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
DBVT vs ALKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DBVT vs ALKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$112M | $281M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$168M | $242M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$151M | $480M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +86.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +17.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +16.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +32.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.5% | -67.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1669.52T | $6.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1669.52T | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.74x | 25.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 3.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -130.2% | +14.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -89.0% | +10.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +18.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -145.7% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$172M | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $194M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -189.82x | 24.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,041 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.7% total return vs ALKS's +15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKS at 7.2% vs DBVT's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +110.7% | +15.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.1% | +23.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.6% | +64.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.1% | -4.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.7% | +7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ALKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 74.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.18 | $36.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.53 | $25.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.4% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.7 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DBVT as "Buy" and ALKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 137.7% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 21.4% for ALKS (target: $44).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.33 | $44.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
ALKS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). DBVT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
DBVT vs ALKS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DBVT or ALKS a better buy right now?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 25.
3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DBVT or ALKS?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +64.
4%, compared to -69. 6% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALKS returned -4. 6% versus DBVT's -87. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DBVT or ALKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
06β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 19% more volatile than ALKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DBVT or ALKS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alkermes plc grew EPS -34.
1% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DBVT or ALKS?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — DBVT or ALKS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is DBVT or ALKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
06)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALKS: -4. 6%, DBVT: -87. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between DBVT and ALKS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.