Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DCO vs SPR vs TDG vs KTOS vs DRS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
DCO vs SPR vs TDG vs KTOS vs DRS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $2.05B | $4.64B | $68.62B | $10.86B | $11.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $825M | $6.39B | $9.11B | $1.42B | $3.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $-2.60B | $1.97B | $29M | $290M |
| Gross Margin | 26.9% | -27.7% | 59.0% | 18.3% | 24.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | -34.6% | 46.5% | 1.8% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 32.8x | 31.5x | 30.6x | 76.4x | 32.5x |
| Total Debt | $47M | $5.38B | $30.03B | $180M | $470M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $537M | $2.81B | $561M | $647M |
DCO vs SPR vs TDG vs KTOS vs DRS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ducommun Incorporat… (DCO) | 100 | 426.2 | +326.2% |
| Spirit AeroSystems … (SPR) | 100 | 169.5 | +69.5% |
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 286.0 | +186.0% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 312.1 | +212.1% |
| Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) | 100 | 827.2 | +727.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DCO vs SPR vs TDG vs KTOS vs DRS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 7.1%, current ratio 3.50x
- +105.7% vs TDG's -5.8%
SPR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.68 vs KTOS's 1.87
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.6%
- PEG 0.98 vs DRS's 2.59
- Beta 0.79, yield 13.6%, current ratio 3.21x
- Lower P/E (30.6x vs 32.5x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.59
KTOS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs SPR's 4.4%
DRS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 54.0% 10Y total return vs DCO's 7.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs SPR's 4.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.6x vs 32.5x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.59 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs SPR's -40.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs KTOS's 1.87 | |
| Dividends | 13.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs DRS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +105.7% vs TDG's -5.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs SPR's -42.6%, ROIC 20.9% vs -50.9% |
DCO vs SPR vs TDG vs KTOS vs DRS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DCO vs SPR vs TDG vs KTOS vs DRS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDG leads in 3 of 6 categories
SPR leads 1 • DCO leads 0 • KTOS leads 0 • DRS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 11.0x DCO's $825M. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPR's -40.7%. On growth, KTOS holds the edge at +22.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $825M | $6.4B | $9.1B | $1.4B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | -$2.0B | $4.6B | $72M | $436M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | -$2.6B | $2.0B | $29M | $290M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$49M | -$803M | $1.9B | -$134M | $397M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.9% | -27.7% | +59.0% | +18.3% | +24.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | -34.6% | +46.5% | +1.8% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -40.7% | +21.6% | +2.1% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | -12.6% | +20.6% | -9.5% | +10.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.4% | +7.8% | +13.9% | +22.6% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | -51.3% | -13.1% | +133.3% | +21.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.9x trailing earnings, TDG trades at a 91% valuation discount to KTOS's 445.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TDG offers better value at 1.22x vs DRS's 3.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $4.6B | $68.6B | $10.9B | $11.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $9.5B | $95.8B | $10.5B | $10.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -60.45x | -2.16x | 37.88x | 445.31x | 40.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.83x | 31.52x | 30.56x | 76.41x | 32.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.22x | — | 3.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 21.15x | 120.40x | 24.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.49x | 0.73x | 7.77x | 8.06x | 3.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.10x | — | — | 5.02x | 4.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 37.79x | — | 48.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TDG and DRS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DRS delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-5 for DCO. DCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DRS's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DRS scores 7/9 vs SPR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.1% | — | — | +1.3% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | -42.6% | +8.6% | +1.0% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | -50.9% | +20.9% | +1.4% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | -44.9% | +20.8% | +1.5% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | — | — | 0.09x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $4.8B | $27.2B | -$381M | -$177M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $537M | $2.8B | $561M | $647M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $47M | $5.4B | $30.0B | $180M | $470M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -5.57x | 2.55x | 6.16x | 40.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DCO and KTOS and DRS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DRS five years ago would be worth $34,929 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,836 for SPR. Over the past 12 months, DCO leads with a +105.7% total return vs TDG's -5.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTOS at 63.6% vs SPR's 17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.8% | — | -10.6% | -27.0% | +19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +105.7% | +8.3% | -5.8% | +69.2% | -0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +181.8% | +61.2% | +83.2% | +338.2% | +165.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.5% | -11.6% | +138.4% | +125.0% | +249.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +762.0% | -11.1% | +583.3% | +1252.6% | +5401.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +41.2% | +17.2% | +22.4% | +63.6% | +38.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPR is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KTOS's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPR currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs KTOS's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 0.68x | 0.79x | 1.87x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $148.82 | $42.33 | $1623.83 | $134.00 | $49.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $63.36 | $34.62 | $1123.61 | $32.85 | $32.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +93.3% | +74.8% | +43.2% | +83.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 67.1 | 57.8 | 33.8 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 186K | 5.8M | 368K | 4.4M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
TDG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DCO as "Buy", SPR as "Hold", TDG as "Buy", KTOS as "Buy", DRS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 89.3% upside for KTOS (target: $110) vs 2.7% for DCO (target: $141). For income investors, TDG offers the higher dividend yield at 13.62% vs DRS's 0.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $141.00 | $46.15 | $1568.30 | $109.58 | $53.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 43 | 39 | 24 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +13.6% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $165.45 | — | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
TDG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SPR leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
DCO vs SPR vs TDG vs KTOS vs DRS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DCO or SPR or TDG or KTOS or DRS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (SPR). TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) offers the better valuation at 37. 9x trailing P/E (30. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ducommun Incorporated (DCO) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DCO or SPR or TDG or KTOS or DRS?
On trailing P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the cheapest at 37.
9x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 445. 3x. On forward P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated is actually cheaper at 30. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TransDigm Group Incorporated wins at 0. 98x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DCO or SPR or TDG or KTOS or DRS?
Over the past 5 years, Leonardo DRS, Inc.
(DRS) delivered a total return of +249. 3%, compared to -11. 6% for Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (SPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DRS returned +54. 0% versus SPR's -11. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DCO or SPR or TDG or KTOS or DRS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.
(SPR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning KTOS is approximately 174% more volatile than SPR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ducommun Incorporated (DCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 17% for Leonardo DRS, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DCO or SPR or TDG or KTOS or DRS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus 4. 4% for Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (SPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Leonardo DRS, Inc. grew EPS 28. 7% year-over-year, compared to -208. 4% for Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDG leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DCO or SPR or TDG or KTOS or DRS?
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
5% net margin versus -33. 9% for Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus -28. 3% for SPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DCO or SPR or TDG or KTOS or DRS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) trades at 30. 6x forward P/E versus 76. 4x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 45. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KTOS: 89. 3% to $109. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — DCO or SPR or TDG or KTOS or DRS?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
6% yield), DRS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DCO, SPR, KTOS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DCO or SPR or TDG or KTOS or DRS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 13. 6% yield, +583. 3% 10Y return). Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDG: +583. 3%, KTOS: +1253%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DCO and SPR and TDG and KTOS and DRS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TDG, DRS pay a dividend while DCO, SPR, KTOS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.