Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DDL vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
DDL vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $586M | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.90B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $331M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 1.3x | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $3.03B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $887M | $86.81B |
DDL vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dingdong (Cayman) L… (DDL) | 100 | 6.8 | -93.2% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 159.8 | +59.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DDL vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DDL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.99
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 295.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, current ratio 1.02x
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs DDL's -88.9%
- 12.2% margin vs DDL's 1.4%
- +48.6% vs DDL's +3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.3x vs 35.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs DDL's 1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.6% vs DDL's +3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs DDL's 4.8%, ROIC 14.7% vs 4.7% |
DDL vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DDL vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 31.1x DDL's $23.9B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DDL's 1.4%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23.9B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $380M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $331M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $677M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
DDL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, DDL trades at a 66% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DDL's 18.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $586M | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $900M | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.13x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.30x | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.63x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.32x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.81x | 384.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DDL delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $23 for AMZN. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DDL's 3.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DDL scores 7/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.7% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.28x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $887M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.92x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,105 for DDL. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs DDL's +3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs DDL's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.3% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.2% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DDL and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DDL is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs DDL's 76.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.41 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.65 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.2% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 573K | 45.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DDL as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DDL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DDL vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DDL or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is the stronger pick with 15.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (1. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DDL or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DDL or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -88. 9% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus DDL's -88. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DDL or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 53% more volatile than DDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 3% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DDL or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is pulling ahead at 15.
5% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dingdong (Cayman) Limited grew EPS 295. 7% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DDL or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 1. 3% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus 0. 9% for DDL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DDL or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) trades at 1.
3x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 34. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — DDL or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DDL or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +715. 9%, DDL: -88. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DDL and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (DDL (Consumer Defensive) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DDL is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.