Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DDL vs WMT vs SFM vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Grocery Stores
Specialty Retail
DDL vs WMT vs SFM vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $585M | $1.04T | $7.62B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.90B | $703.06B | $8.90B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $331M | $22.91B | $507M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 24.9% | 37.0% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 4.1% | 7.6% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 1.3x | 44.7x | 14.5x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.03B | $67.09B | $1.94B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $887M | $10.73B | $257M | $86.81B |
DDL vs WMT vs SFM vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dingdong (Cayman) L… (DDL) | 100 | 6.8 | -93.2% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 277.0 | +177.0% |
| Sprouts Farmers Mar… (SFM) | 100 | 325.9 | +225.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 157.6 | +57.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DDL vs WMT vs SFM vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DDL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 295.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- 15.5% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7%
- Lower P/E (1.3x vs 34.8x)
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12, yield 0.7%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12 vs AMZN's 1.51
SFM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.86 vs WMT's 4.06
- 12.5% ROA vs DDL's 4.8%, ROIC 17.8% vs 4.7%
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs WMT's 499.5%
- 12.2% margin vs DDL's 1.4%
- +43.7% vs SFM's -51.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.3x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs DDL's 1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 37-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs SFM's -51.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs DDL's 4.8%, ROIC 17.8% vs 4.7% |
DDL vs WMT vs SFM vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DDL vs WMT vs SFM vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
DDL leads 1 • SFM leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 83.5x SFM's $8.9B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DDL's 1.4%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23.9B | $703.1B | $8.9B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $380M | $42.8B | $996M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $331M | $22.9B | $507M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $677M | $15.3B | $361M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +24.9% | +37.0% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +4.1% | +7.6% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +3.3% | +5.7% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +2.2% | +4.1% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +5.8% | +4.1% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +35.1% | -5.5% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
DDL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, DDL trades at a 73% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SFM offers better value at 0.90x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $585M | $1.04T | $7.6B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $899M | $1.09T | $9.3B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.08x | 47.69x | 15.25x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.30x | 44.71x | 14.52x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x | 0.90x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.59x | 24.85x | 9.35x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 1.46x | 0.86x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.31x | 10.45x | 5.70x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.79x | 24.97x | 16.29x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $22 for WMT. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DDL's 3.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DDL scores 7/9 vs SFM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.7% | +22.3% | +36.1% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +7.9% | +12.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +14.7% | +17.8% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.1% | +17.5% | +22.1% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.28x | 0.67x | 1.39x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $56.4B | $1.7B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $887M | $10.7B | $257M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $67.1B | $1.9B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.92x | 11.85x | 254.65x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $31,381 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,103 for DDL. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs SFM's -51.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs DDL's -13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.4% | +15.7% | +0.4% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.2% | +32.7% | -51.7% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.4% | +160.5% | +125.7% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +186.9% | +213.8% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | +499.5% | +203.9% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.6% | +37.6% | +31.2% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SFM's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.12x | 0.17x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.41 | $134.69 | $182.00 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.65 | $91.89 | $64.75 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.1% | +96.7% | +44.5% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 55.9 | 54.9 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 559K | 17.2M | 2.2M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
WMT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DDL as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", SFM as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.1% upside for AMZN (target: $307) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 | $91.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 64 | 43 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.8% | +6.2% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). DDL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DDL vs WMT vs SFM vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DDL or WMT or SFM or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is the stronger pick with 15.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (1. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DDL or WMT or SFM or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. wins at 0. 86x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DDL or WMT or SFM or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to -89. 0% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus DDL's -89. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DDL or WMT or SFM or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 1194% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 3% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DDL or WMT or SFM or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) is pulling ahead at 15.
5% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dingdong (Cayman) Limited grew EPS 295. 7% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DDL or WMT or SFM or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 1. 3% for Dingdong (Cayman) Limited — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus 0. 9% for DDL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DDL or WMT or SFM or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 86x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Dingdong (Cayman) Limited (DDL) trades at 1. 3x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 43. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMZN: 13. 1% to $306. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — DDL or WMT or SFM or AMZN?
In this comparison, WMT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. DDL, SFM, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DDL or WMT or SFM or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, DDL: -89. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DDL and WMT and SFM and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (DDL (Consumer Defensive) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and SFM (Consumer Defensive) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DDL is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. WMT pays a dividend while DDL, SFM, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.