Department Stores
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DDS vs SKY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
DDS vs SKY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Department Stores | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $6.81B | $4.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.56B | $2.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $571M | $214M |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 26.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | 9.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.9x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $358M | $131M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $862M | $610M |
DDS vs SKY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) | 100 | 1904.3 | +1804.3% |
| Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) | 100 | 305.6 | +205.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DDS vs SKY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DDS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 5.4%
- 9.2% 10Y total return vs SKY's 7.4%
- Lower P/E (16.9x vs 20.1x)
SKY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 22.7%, EPS growth 35.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 2.41x
- Beta 0.96, current ratio 2.41x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% revenue growth vs DDS's -0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.7% margin vs SKY's 8.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs DDS's 1.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.2% vs SKY's -12.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs SKY's 10.1%, ROIC 29.7% vs 16.9% |
DDS vs SKY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DDS vs SKY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DDS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DDS is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 2.5x SKY's $2.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.7% (DDS) to 8.1% (SKY). On growth, SKY holds the edge at +1.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $868M | $306M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $571M | $214M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $620M | $260M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.3% | +26.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +9.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | -3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DDS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, DDS trades at a 29% valuation discount to SKY's 22.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DDS's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKY's 13.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.8B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.68x | 22.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.85x | 20.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.27x | 13.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.04x | 1.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.79x | 2.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.93x | 22.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DDS leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DDS delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $13 for SKY. SKY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DDS's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKY scores 7/9 vs DDS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.3% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.3% | +10.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.7% | +16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.0% | +14.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$504M | -$479M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $862M | $610M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $358M | $131M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 51.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DDS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DDS five years ago would be worth $64,567 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,393 for SKY. Over the past 12 months, DDS leads with a +74.2% total return vs SKY's -12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DDS at 30.7% vs SKY's 0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.2% | -10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.2% | -12.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.5% | +0.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +545.7% | +73.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +918.4% | +739.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.7% | +0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DDS and SKY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SKY is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DDS's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $741.98 | $99.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $343.12 | $59.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +76.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.4 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 501K |
Analyst Outlook
DDS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DDS as "Hold" and SKY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.6% upside for SKY (target: $106) vs -2.9% for DDS (target: $555). DDS is the only dividend payer here at 5.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $555.00 | $106.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $31.08 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% |
DDS leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
DDS vs SKY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DDS or SKY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 4% for Dillard's, Inc. (DDS). Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DDS or SKY?
On trailing P/E, Dillard's, Inc.
(DDS) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus Champion Homes, Inc. at 22. 2x. On forward P/E, Dillard's, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DDS or SKY?
Over the past 5 years, Dillard's, Inc.
(DDS) delivered a total return of +545. 7%, compared to +73. 9% for Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DDS returned +918. 4% versus SKY's +739. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DDS or SKY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus Dillard's, Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning DDS is approximately 20% more volatile than SKY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 15% for Dillard's, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DDS or SKY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus -0. 4% for Dillard's, Inc. (DDS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Champion Homes, Inc. grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1. 0% for Dillard's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKY leads at 4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DDS or SKY?
Dillard's, Inc.
(DDS) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus 8. 0% for Champion Homes, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DDS leads at 10. 5% versus 9. 5% for SKY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DDS leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DDS or SKY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Dillard's, Inc.
(DDS) trades at 16. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for Champion Homes, Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKY: 39. 6% to $106. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DDS or SKY?
In this comparison, DDS (5.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SKY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DDS or SKY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dillard's, Inc.
(DDS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 5. 4% yield, +918. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DDS: +918. 4%, SKY: +739. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DDS and SKY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DDS is a small-cap deep-value stock; SKY is a small-cap high-growth stock. DDS pays a dividend while SKY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.