DEA vs AMT

For growth investors, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

(DEA) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the better valuation at 33. 4x trailing P/E (27. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Tower Corporation (AMT) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the cheapest at 33.

4x versus Easterly Government Properties, Inc. at 80. 3x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, American Tower Corporation (AMT) delivered a total return of -13.

3%, compared to -37. 9% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMT returned +114. 4% versus DEA's -10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

04β versus Easterly Government Properties, Inc. 's 0. 51β — meaning DEA is approximately -1464% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 123% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Easterly Government Properties, Inc.

(DEA) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus 5. 1% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Tower Corporation grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -37. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEA leads at 4. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

8% net margin versus 3. 9% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMT leads at 45. 8% versus 24. 9% for DEA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMT leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27.

5x forward P/E versus 69. 5x for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. — 42. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMT: 20. 1% to $216. 33.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) offers the highest yield at 9. 0%, versus 3. 7% for American Tower Corporation (AMT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

04), 3. 7% yield, +114. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +114. 4%, DEA: -10. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.