REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DEA vs GOOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
DEA vs GOOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.08B | $599M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $344M | $166M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | 49.7% | -11.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.9% | 27.9% |
| Forward P/E | 69.5x | 80.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.68B | $856M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $11M |
DEA vs GOOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Easterly Government… (DEA) | 100 | 37.2 | -62.8% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 69.1 | -30.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DEA vs GOOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 9.0%
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth -37.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, current ratio 0.05x
GOOD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 49.8% 10Y total return vs DEA's -10.5%
- Beta 0.55, yield 11.7%, current ratio 1.63x
- 12.7% margin vs DEA's 4.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% FFO/revenue growth vs GOOD's 8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (69.5x vs 80.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs DEA's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs GOOD's 0.55, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.7% yield, vs DEA's 9.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.4% vs GOOD's -3.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs DEA's 0.4%, ROIC 4.4% vs 2.1% |
DEA vs GOOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DEA vs GOOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DEA is the larger business by revenue, generating $344M annually — 2.1x GOOD's $166M. GOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DEA's 4.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $344M | $166M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $203M | $106M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $262M | $90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.7% | -11.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +27.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +76.2% | +54.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.4% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
DEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.2x trailing earnings, GOOD trades at a 62% valuation discount to DEA's 80.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GOOD's 12.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DEA's 13.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $599M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 80.31x | 30.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 69.52x | 80.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.85x | 12.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 3.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 1.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.16x | 8.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $1 for DEA. DEA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.1% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.23x | 2.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $846M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $856M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | 1.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOD five years ago would be worth $8,994 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,215 for DEA. Over the past 12 months, DEA leads with a +21.4% total return vs GOOD's -3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOD at 12.1% vs DEA's -6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.4% | +18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.4% | -3.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.4% | +40.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.9% | -10.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.5% | +49.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.2% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
DEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DEA is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOD's 0.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DEA currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs GOOD's 82.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.94 | $15.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.82 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 386K | 390K |
Analyst Outlook
GOOD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DEA as "Hold" and GOOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.0% upside for GOOD (target: $13) vs -29.5% for DEA (target: $16). For income investors, GOOD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.66% vs DEA's 9.01%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.41 | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.0% | +11.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.10 | $1.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
GOOD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DEA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
DEA vs GOOD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DEA or GOOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the better valuation at 30. 2x trailing P/E (80. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DEA or GOOD?
On trailing P/E, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the cheapest at 30.
2x versus Easterly Government Properties, Inc. at 80. 3x. On forward P/E, Easterly Government Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 69. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DEA or GOOD?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) delivered a total return of -10.
1%, compared to -37. 9% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOD returned +49. 8% versus DEA's -10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DEA or GOOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation's 0. 55β — meaning GOOD is approximately 8% more volatile than DEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 123% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DEA or GOOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus 8. 0% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gladstone Commercial Corporation grew EPS 57. 7% year-over-year, compared to -37. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEA leads at 4. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DEA or GOOD?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus 3. 9% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOD leads at 37. 2% versus 24. 9% for DEA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOD leads at 5. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DEA or GOOD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) trades at 69. 5x forward P/E versus 80. 8x for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOOD: 5. 0% to $13. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DEA or GOOD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the highest yield at 11. 7%, versus 9. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA).
09Is DEA or GOOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 11. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOD: +49. 8%, DEA: -10. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DEA and GOOD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.