Oil & Gas Energy
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DEC vs CNX vs CTRA vs AR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
DEC vs CNX vs CTRA vs AR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Energy | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $1.17B | $5.17B | $24.72B | $11.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.41B | $2.32B | $6.48B | $5.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $254M | $1.18B | $1.67B | $962M |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | 28.7% | 40.6% | 26.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 21.4% | 30.7% | 20.9% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 12.3x | 11.3x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $237M | $2.45B | $4.01B | $5.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $779K | $119M | $210M |
DEC vs CNX vs CTRA vs AR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diversified Energy … (DEC) | 100 | 61.1 | -38.9% |
| CNX Resources Corpo… (CNX) | 100 | 357.2 | +257.2% |
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 100 | 180.9 | +80.9% |
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | 100 | 1240.1 | +1140.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DEC vs CNX vs CTRA vs AR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DEC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta -0.12, yield 7.1%
- Rev growth 102.7%, EPS growth 346.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.7%
- Beta -0.12, yield 7.1%, current ratio 0.60x
- 102.7% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6%
CNX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 159.3% 10Y total return vs AR's 43.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 56.5%, current ratio 0.44x
- 50.9% margin vs DEC's 10.5%
- Beta 0.09 vs AR's 0.14, lower leverage
CTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +33.9% vs AR's -8.4%
AR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 11.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 102.7% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 11.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.9% margin vs DEC's 10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs AR's 0.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs CTRA's 2.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.9% vs AR's -8.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.5% ROA vs DEC's 5.2%, ROIC 9.0% vs 10.8% |
DEC vs CNX vs CTRA vs AR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DEC vs CNX vs CTRA vs AR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTRA leads in 2 of 6 categories
DEC leads 2 • CNX leads 1 • AR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTRA is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.5B annually — 2.8x CNX's $2.3B. CNX is the more profitable business, keeping 50.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DEC's 10.5%. On growth, DEC holds the edge at +95.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $2.3B | $6.5B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $870M | $1.1B | $4.4B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $254M | $1.2B | $1.7B | $962M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $376M | $282M | $2.6B | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +28.7% | +40.6% | +26.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +21.4% | +30.7% | +20.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +50.9% | +25.7% | +17.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +12.2% | +40.8% | -18.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.7% | +28.8% | -43.3% | +33.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +2.7% | -10.3% | +160.6% |
Valuation Metrics
DEC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.5x trailing earnings, DEC trades at a 81% valuation discount to AR's 18.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DEC's 2.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AR's 10.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $5.2B | $24.7B | $11.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $7.6B | $28.6B | $16.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.52x | 9.15x | 14.47x | 18.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.55x | 12.28x | 11.28x | 8.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.41x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.09x | 5.60x | 5.93x | 10.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.72x | 2.41x | 8.99x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 1.35x | 1.67x | 1.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.17x | 9.68x | 15.13x | 9.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DEC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DEC delivers a 37.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $11 for CTRA. DEC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AR's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DEC scores 8/9 vs CTRA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +37.1% | +27.5% | +11.3% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +17.5% | +6.9% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.8% | +9.0% | +10.9% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | +10.3% | +11.3% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.57x | 0.27x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $207M | $2.5B | $3.9B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $779,000 | $119M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $237M | $2.5B | $4.0B | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.69x | 7.11x | 8.88x | 14.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AR five years ago would be worth $31,318 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,085 for DEC. Over the past 12 months, CTRA leads with a +33.9% total return vs AR's -8.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNX at 31.5% vs DEC's -1.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.0% | -0.2% | +23.2% | +8.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.7% | +11.9% | +33.9% | -8.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.0% | +127.6% | +37.3% | +64.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.2% | +163.8% | +119.9% | +213.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.3% | +159.3% | +70.3% | +43.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.7% | +31.5% | +11.2% | +18.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CTRA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTRA is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AR's 0.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTRA currently trades 88.3% from its 52-week high vs AR's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.12x | 0.09x | -0.15x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.90 | $43.62 | $36.88 | $45.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.33 | $27.72 | $22.33 | $29.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.4% | +83.4% | +88.3% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 31.2 | 43.4 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 1.9M | 10.2M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DEC and CTRA and AR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DEC as "Buy", CNX as "Hold", CTRA as "Buy", AR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.4% upside for DEC (target: $22) vs -0.6% for CNX (target: $36). For income investors, DEC offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs CTRA's 2.75%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.33 | $36.17 | $34.00 | $48.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 41 | 55 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.1% | — | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | — | $0.90 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.5% | +10.1% | +0.6% | +1.2% |
CTRA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). DEC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
DEC vs CNX vs CTRA vs AR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DEC or CNX or CTRA or AR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Diversified Energy Company PLC (DEC) is the stronger pick with 102.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Diversified Energy Company PLC (DEC) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Diversified Energy Company PLC (DEC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DEC or CNX or CTRA or AR?
On trailing P/E, Diversified Energy Company PLC (DEC) is the cheapest at 3.
5x versus Antero Resources Corporation at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, Antero Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DEC or CNX or CTRA or AR?
Over the past 5 years, Antero Resources Corporation (AR) delivered a total return of +213.
2%, compared to -19. 2% for Diversified Energy Company PLC (DEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNX returned +159. 3% versus DEC's +13. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DEC or CNX or CTRA or AR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 15β versus Antero Resources Corporation's 0. 14β — meaning AR is approximately -193% more volatile than CTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diversified Energy Company PLC (DEC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 67% for Antero Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DEC or CNX or CTRA or AR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diversified Energy Company PLC (DEC) is pulling ahead at 102.
7% versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Antero Resources Corporation grew EPS 1028% year-over-year, compared to 49. 0% for Coterra Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEC leads at -5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DEC or CNX or CTRA or AR?
Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 4% net margin versus 12. 7% for Antero Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 62. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRA leads at 89. 1% versus 15. 1% for DEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTRA leads at 60. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DEC or CNX or CTRA or AR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Antero Resources Corporation (AR) trades at 8.
4x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for CNX Resources Corporation — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DEC: 38. 4% to $22. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — DEC or CNX or CTRA or AR?
In this comparison, DEC (7.
1% yield), CTRA (2. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CNX, AR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DEC or CNX or CTRA or AR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 15), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTRA: +70. 3%, AR: +43. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DEC and CNX and CTRA and AR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DEC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNX is a small-cap high-growth stock; CTRA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. DEC, CTRA pay a dividend while CNX, AR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.