Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DECK vs CROX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation

Apparel - Footwear & Accessories

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$14.79B
5Y Perf.+241.6%
CROX
Crocs, Inc.

Apparel - Footwear & Accessories

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.29B
5Y Perf.+269.1%

DECK vs CROX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DECK logoDECK
CROX logoCROX
IndustryApparel - Footwear & AccessoriesApparel - Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap$14.79B$5.29B
Revenue (TTM)$5.37B$4.02B
Net Income (TTM)$1.04B$-104M
Gross Margin57.5%58.1%
Operating Margin23.8%21.5%
Forward P/E15.1x7.9x
Total Debt$277M$1.61B
Cash & Equiv.$1.89B$130M

DECK vs CROXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DECK
CROX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Deckers Outdoor Cor… (DECK)100341.6+241.6%
Crocs, Inc. (CROX)100369.1+269.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DECK vs CROX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DECK and CROX are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Crocs, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
The Income Pick

DECK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.46
  • Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 30.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.46, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 3.72x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CROX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 12.1% 10Y total return vs DECK's 10.1%
  • Beta 1.18, current ratio 1.27x
  • Lower P/E (7.9x vs 15.1x)
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDECK logoDECK16.3% revenue growth vs CROX's -1.5%
ValueCROX logoCROXLower P/E (7.9x vs 15.1x)
Quality / MarginsDECK logoDECK19.3% margin vs CROX's -2.6%
Stability / SafetyCROX logoCROXBeta 1.18 vs DECK's 1.46
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CROX logoCROX+7.1% vs DECK's -11.2%
Efficiency (ROA)DECK logoDECK25.4% ROA vs CROX's -2.4%, ROIC 99.7% vs 21.7%

DECK vs CROX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

DECKDeckers Outdoor Corporation
FY 2025
Direct-to-Consumer
42.7%$2.1B
Hoka Brand Segment
28.0%$1.4B
UGG Wholesale Segment
25.7%$1.3B
Other Wholesale Segment
3.5%$176M
CROXCrocs, Inc.
FY 2025
Crocs Brand Segment
82.3%$3.3B
HEYDUDE Brand Segment
17.7%$715M

DECK vs CROX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDECKLAGGINGCROX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DECK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

DECK and CROX operate at a comparable scale, with $5.4B and $4.0B in trailing revenue. DECK is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CROX's -2.6%. On growth, DECK holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDECK logoDECKDeckers Outdoor C…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.4B$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.3B$946M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.0B-$104M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$929M$671M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+57.5%+58.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.8%+21.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+19.3%-2.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+17.3%+16.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.1%-1.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.0%-4.2%
DECK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CROX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CROX's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DECK's 10.6x.

MetricDECK logoDECKDeckers Outdoor C…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$14.8B$5.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13.2B$6.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.42x-70.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.09x7.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.52x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.56x7.01x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.97x1.31x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.31x4.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.43x8.03x
CROX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DECK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

DECK delivers a 39.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-8 for CROX. DECK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CROX's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DECK scores 9/9 vs CROX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricDECK logoDECKDeckers Outdoor C…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+39.9%-7.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+25.4%-2.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+99.7%+21.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+44.7%+23.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–995
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x1.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.6B$1.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.9B$130M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$277M$1.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense301.92x10.07x
DECK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — DECK and CROX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in DECK five years ago would be worth $18,315 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,960 for CROX. Over the past 12 months, CROX leads with a +7.1% total return vs DECK's -11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DECK at 8.0% vs CROX's -3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDECK logoDECKDeckers Outdoor C…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-2.7%+21.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-11.2%+7.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+26.1%-9.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+83.2%-0.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1006.7%+1212.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.0%-3.2%
Evenly matched — DECK and CROX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CROX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CROX is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DECK's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CROX currently trades 86.1% from its 52-week high vs DECK's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDECK logoDECKDeckers Outdoor C…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.46x1.18x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$133.43$122.84
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$78.91$73.21
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+77.9%+86.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.558.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.8M1.2M
CROX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

DECK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates DECK as "Buy" and CROX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.8% upside for DECK (target: $121) vs 1.1% for CROX (target: $107).

MetricDECK logoDECKDeckers Outdoor C…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$121.38$106.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts5437
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.8%+11.1%
DECK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

DECK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CROX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallDeckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DECK vs CROX: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DECK or CROX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is the stronger pick with 16.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DECK or CROX?

On forward P/E, Crocs, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DECK or CROX?

Over the past 5 years, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) delivered a total return of +83.

2%, compared to -0. 4% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CROX returned +1212% versus DECK's +1007%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DECK or CROX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crocs, Inc.

(CROX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Deckers Outdoor Corporation's 1. 46β — meaning DECK is approximately 24% more volatile than CROX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 125% for Crocs, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DECK or CROX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is pulling ahead at 16.

3% versus -1. 5% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deckers Outdoor Corporation grew EPS 30. 2% year-over-year, compared to -109. 4% for Crocs, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DECK leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DECK or CROX?

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

4% net margin versus -2. 0% for Crocs, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DECK leads at 23. 6% versus 22. 0% for CROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DECK leads at 57. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DECK or CROX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Crocs, Inc.

(CROX) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 1x for Deckers Outdoor Corporation — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DECK: 16. 8% to $121. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DECK or CROX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is DECK or CROX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Crocs, Inc.

(CROX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +1212% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CROX: +1212%, DECK: +1007%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DECK and CROX?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: DECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CROX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

DECK

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CROX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform DECK and CROX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(DECK: 7.1% · CROX: -1.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.