Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DECK vs CROX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
DECK vs CROX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $14.79B | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.37B | $4.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.04B | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 58.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.8% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $277M | $1.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.89B | $130M |
DECK vs CROX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deckers Outdoor Cor… (DECK) | 100 | 341.6 | +241.6% |
| Crocs, Inc. (CROX) | 100 | 369.1 | +269.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DECK vs CROX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DECK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.46
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 30.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.46, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 3.72x
CROX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 12.1% 10Y total return vs DECK's 10.1%
- Beta 1.18, current ratio 1.27x
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 15.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% revenue growth vs CROX's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 15.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs CROX's -2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs DECK's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.1% vs DECK's -11.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 25.4% ROA vs CROX's -2.4%, ROIC 99.7% vs 21.7% |
DECK vs CROX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DECK vs CROX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DECK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DECK and CROX operate at a comparable scale, with $5.4B and $4.0B in trailing revenue. DECK is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CROX's -2.6%. On growth, DECK holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $946M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $929M | $671M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +58.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | -2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +16.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | -1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | -4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CROX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CROX's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DECK's 10.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.8B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.2B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.42x | -70.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.09x | 7.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.52x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.56x | 7.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.97x | 1.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.31x | 4.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.43x | 8.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DECK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DECK delivers a 39.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-8 for CROX. DECK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CROX's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DECK scores 9/9 vs CROX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +39.9% | -7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +25.4% | -2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +99.7% | +21.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +44.7% | +23.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 1.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $130M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $277M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 301.92x | 10.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DECK and CROX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DECK five years ago would be worth $18,315 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,960 for CROX. Over the past 12 months, CROX leads with a +7.1% total return vs DECK's -11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DECK at 8.0% vs CROX's -3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.7% | +21.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.2% | +7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.1% | -9.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.2% | -0.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1006.7% | +1212.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.0% | -3.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CROX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CROX is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DECK's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CROX currently trades 86.1% from its 52-week high vs DECK's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $133.43 | $122.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $78.91 | $73.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +86.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.5 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
DECK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DECK as "Buy" and CROX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.8% upside for DECK (target: $121) vs 1.1% for CROX (target: $107).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $121.38 | $106.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 54 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.8% | +11.1% |
DECK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CROX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
DECK vs CROX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DECK or CROX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is the stronger pick with 16.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DECK or CROX?
On forward P/E, Crocs, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DECK or CROX?
Over the past 5 years, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) delivered a total return of +83.
2%, compared to -0. 4% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CROX returned +1212% versus DECK's +1007%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DECK or CROX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Deckers Outdoor Corporation's 1. 46β — meaning DECK is approximately 24% more volatile than CROX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 125% for Crocs, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DECK or CROX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is pulling ahead at 16.
3% versus -1. 5% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deckers Outdoor Corporation grew EPS 30. 2% year-over-year, compared to -109. 4% for Crocs, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DECK leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DECK or CROX?
Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
4% net margin versus -2. 0% for Crocs, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DECK leads at 23. 6% versus 22. 0% for CROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DECK leads at 57. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DECK or CROX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 15. 1x for Deckers Outdoor Corporation — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DECK: 16. 8% to $121. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — DECK or CROX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DECK or CROX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +1212% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CROX: +1212%, DECK: +1007%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DECK and CROX?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CROX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.