Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DENN vs EAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
DENN vs EAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $322M | $6.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $457M | $5.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $463M |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | 15.0x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $408M | $1.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $19M |
DENN vs EAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 57.6 | -42.4% |
| Brinker Internation… (EAT) | 100 | 544.7 | +444.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DENN vs EAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DENN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, current ratio 0.42x
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 0.42x
EAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.9%, EPS growth 144.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
- 236.3% 10Y total return vs DENN's -41.7%
- 21.9% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.9% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs DENN's 2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs EAT's 1.12 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.8% vs EAT's +9.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs DENN's 2.0%, ROIC 19.1% vs 9.7% |
DENN vs EAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DENN vs EAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 12.5x DENN's $457M. EAT is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DENN's 2.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $457M | $5.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $55M | $819M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10M | $463M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $504M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -89.9% | +12.1% |
Valuation Metrics
EAT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, DENN trades at a 14% valuation discount to EAT's 17.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EAT's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DENN's 12.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $322M | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $728M | $8.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.24x | 17.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.02x | 13.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.10x | 11.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.71x | 1.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 18.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 350.62x | 15.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +123.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.7% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.9% | +25.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $406M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $19M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $408M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.73x | 18.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EAT five years ago would be worth $23,182 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,551 for DENN. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +59.8% total return vs EAT's +9.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EAT at 58.5% vs DENN's -16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | -2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.8% | +9.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.3% | +298.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.5% | +131.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.7% | +236.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.3% | +58.5% |
Risk & Volatility
DENN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DENN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EAT's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs EAT's 78.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.26 | $187.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.36 | $100.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +78.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.9 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DENN as "Buy" and EAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for EAT (target: $184) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $184.46 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +1.4% |
EAT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DENN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
DENN vs EAT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DENN or EAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Denny's Corporation (DENN) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Denny's Corporation (DENN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DENN or EAT?
On trailing P/E, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the cheapest at 15.
2x versus Brinker International, Inc. at 17. 7x. On forward P/E, Brinker International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DENN or EAT?
Over the past 5 years, Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) delivered a total return of +131. 8%, compared to -64. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EAT returned +236. 3% versus DENN's -41. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DENN or EAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus Brinker International, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning EAT is approximately 72% more volatile than DENN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — DENN or EAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brinker International, Inc. grew EPS 144. 7% year-over-year, compared to 17. 1% for Denny's Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, EAT leads at 12. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DENN or EAT?
Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus 4. 8% for Denny's Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DENN leads at 10. 0% versus 9. 5% for EAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DENN or EAT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brinker International, Inc.
(EAT) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Denny's Corporation — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EAT: 25. 4% to $184. 46.
08Which pays a better dividend — DENN or EAT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DENN or EAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
65)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DENN: -41. 7%, EAT: +236. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DENN and EAT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock; EAT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.