Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DERM vs MCK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Distribution
DERM vs MCK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $106M | $91.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $397.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $4.34B |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | 3.4% |
| Operating Margin | -12.2% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 71.9x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $7.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $5.69B |
DERM vs MCK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Journey Medical Cor… (DERM) | 100 | 65.9 | -34.1% |
| McKesson Corporation (MCK) | 100 | 343.1 | +243.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DERM vs MCK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, DERM is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
MCK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 17 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 14.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.8%
- 351.9% 10Y total return vs DERM's -45.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.2% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.1x vs 71.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.1% margin vs DERM's -15.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs DERM's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 17-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.0% vs DERM's -19.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs DERM's -10.8%, ROIC 5.4% vs -56.8% |
DERM vs MCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DERM vs MCK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $398.0B annually — 7056.4x DERM's $56M. MCK is the more profitable business, keeping 1.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DERM's -15.5%. On growth, MCK holds the edge at +11.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | $398.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $5.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $10.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.5% | +3.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.2% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.5% | +1.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.0% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | +38.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MCK leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $106M | $91.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $112M | $92.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.24x | 28.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 71.86x | 19.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.90x | 0.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.30x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCK scores 6/9 vs DERM's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.8% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -56.8% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.2% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.52x | 25.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $40,840 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,484 for DERM. Over the past 12 months, MCK leads with a +5.0% total return vs DERM's -19.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DERM at 46.7% vs MCK's 26.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.1% | -9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.8% | +5.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +215.8% | +104.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.2% | +308.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.2% | +351.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.7% | +26.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MCK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCK is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DERM's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCK currently trades 74.4% from its 52-week high vs DERM's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.82x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.55 | $999.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.31 | $637.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.5% | +74.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.4 | 25.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 228K | 737K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DERM as "Buy" and MCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.5% upside for DERM (target: $12) vs 35.3% for MCK (target: $1007). MCK is the only dividend payer here at 0.36% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.75 | $1006.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 17 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
MCK leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
DERM vs MCK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DERM or MCK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the stronger pick with 16.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). McKesson Corporation (MCK) offers the better valuation at 28. 9x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DERM or MCK?
On forward P/E, McKesson Corporation is actually cheaper at 19.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DERM or MCK?
Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +308.
4%, compared to -45. 2% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCK returned +351. 9% versus DERM's -45. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DERM or MCK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
04β versus Journey Medical Corporation's 1. 82β — meaning DERM is approximately 4113% more volatile than MCK relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — DERM or MCK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is pulling ahead at 16.
2% versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McKesson Corporation grew EPS 14. 9% year-over-year, compared to -242. 9% for Journey Medical Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MCK leads at 10. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DERM or MCK?
McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
9% net margin versus -26. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCK leads at 1. 2% versus -24. 4% for DERM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DERM leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DERM or MCK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, McKesson Corporation (MCK) trades at 19.
1x forward P/E versus 71. 9x for Journey Medical Corporation — 52. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DERM: 125. 5% to $11. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — DERM or MCK?
In this comparison, MCK (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. DERM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DERM or MCK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
04), +351. 9% 10Y return). Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCK: +351. 9%, DERM: -45. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DERM and MCK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DERM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.