Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DFLI vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CLNE vs GSAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Telecommunications Services
DFLI vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CLNE vs GSAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $14M | $607.77B | $21.96B | $485M | $10.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $58M | $72M | $71M | $439M | $283M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $-99M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 11.7% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | -34.8% | -121.4% | -405.7% | 7.4% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.5x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $55M | $8.76B | $32M | $99M | $546M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $158M | $447M |
DFLI vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CLNE vs GSAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dragonfly Energy Ho… (DFLI) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 24.0 | -76.0% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 607.7 | +507.7% |
| Clean Energy Fuels … (CLNE) | 100 | 27.9 | -72.1% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 275.0 | +175.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DFLI vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CLNE vs GSAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DFLI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +322.4% vs CLNE's +29.2%
Among these 5 stocks, SPIR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ASTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs GSAT's 204.0%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
CLNE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.04
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 17.5%, current ratio 2.32x
- Beta 1.04, current ratio 2.32x
- Better valuation composite
GSAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- -5.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- -0.6% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 2.3% vs -0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs SPIR's 3.10 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +322.4% vs CLNE's +29.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 2.3% vs -0.1% |
DFLI vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CLNE vs GSAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DFLI vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CLNE vs GSAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GSAT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLNE leads 1 • ASTS leads 1 • DFLI leads 0 • SPIR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GSAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLNE is the larger business by revenue, generating $439M annually — 7.6x DFLI's $58M. GSAT is the more profitable business, keeping -5.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $58M | $72M | $71M | $439M | $283M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | -$74M | -$237M | $62M | $108M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | -$25.0B | -$342M | -$99M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | $19M | $45M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +11.7% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.8% | -121.4% | -4.1% | +7.4% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -60.1% | -349.6% | -4.8% | -22.7% | -5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.7% | -227.0% | -16.0% | +4.3% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.5% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +13.3% | +16.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.6% | +59.5% | -55.6% | +90.0% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CLNE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CLNE's 90.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GSAT's 104.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $607.8B | $22.0B | $485M | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $65M | $591.7B | $19.7B | $426M | $10.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.35x | 11.48x | -56.01x | -2.19x | -547.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 90.01x | 104.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 8493.94x | 309.69x | 1.14x | 38.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.23x | 6.53x | 0.86x | 29.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 8.10x | 137.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GSAT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GSAT delivers a -3.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-4 for DFLI. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GSAT's 1.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs DFLI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.4% | -88.4% | -21.1% | -17.2% | -3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.0% | -47.3% | -12.6% | -9.2% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -48.6% | -0.1% | -47.1% | -9.4% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.4% | -0.1% | -10.0% | -9.4% | +0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.18x | 1.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | -$59M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $158M | $447M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $55M | $8.8B | $32M | $99M | $546M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.52x | 9.20x | -21.20x | -1.07x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $97,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $234 for DFLI. Over the past 12 months, DFLI leads with a +322.4% total return vs CLNE's +29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 145.9% vs DFLI's -63.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.5% | +136.7% | -10.1% | +2.3% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +322.4% | +93.8% | +197.2% | +29.2% | +306.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.0% | +242.0% | +1386.1% | -48.6% | +488.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -76.6% | +872.1% | -74.8% | +402.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -75.7% | +668.2% | -30.1% | +204.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.1% | +50.7% | +145.9% | -19.9% | +80.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLNE and GSAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLNE is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 3.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GSAT currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs DFLI's 40.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.68x | 3.10x | 2.83x | 1.04x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.15 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $3.11 | $82.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $1.60 | $17.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.2% | +78.4% | +57.8% | +71.1% | +99.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 47.7 | 38.1 | 49.0 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 457K | 1.6M | 15.1M | 1.4M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DFLI as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", CLNE as "Buy", GSAT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 315.5% upside for DFLI (target: $9) vs -19.6% for GSAT (target: $66). GSAT is the only dividend payer here at 0.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.60 | $17.25 | $103.65 | $3.50 | $66.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 7 | 22 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
GSAT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLNE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DFLI vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CLNE vs GSAT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DFLI or SPIR or ASTS or CLNE or GSAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DFLI or SPIR or ASTS or CLNE or GSAT?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +872. 1%, compared to -97. 7% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +668. 2% versus DFLI's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DFLI or SPIR or ASTS or CLNE or GSAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
(CLNE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 3. 10β — meaning SPIR is approximately 197% more volatile than CLNE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 154% for Globalstar, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DFLI or SPIR or ASTS or CLNE or GSAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -173. 0% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DFLI or SPIR or ASTS or CLNE or GSAT?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GSAT leads at 5. 4% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GSAT leads at 64. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — DFLI or SPIR or ASTS or CLNE or GSAT?
In this comparison, GSAT (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. DFLI, SPIR, ASTS, CLNE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is DFLI or SPIR or ASTS or CLNE or GSAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Clean Energy Fuels Corp.
(CLNE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04)). Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI) carries a higher beta of 2. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLNE: -30. 1%, DFLI: -97. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between DFLI and SPIR and ASTS and CLNE and GSAT?
These companies operate in different sectors (DFLI (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and CLNE (Energy) and GSAT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DFLI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CLNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Gross Margin > 24%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.