Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DH vs PINC vs DOCS vs HCAT vs INVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Biotechnology
DH vs PINC vs DOCS vs HCAT vs INVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $96M | $2.34B | $5.24B | $113M | $1.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $238M | $1.00B | $638M | $311M | $424M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-170M | $-24M | $239M | $-178M | $504M |
| Gross Margin | 76.0% | 72.6% | 89.7% | 48.7% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -15.6% | -0.0% | 37.4% | -51.7% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 5.5x | 20.8x | 16.8x | 14.1x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $178M | $282M | $12M | $20M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $164M | $84M | $210M | $51M | $551M |
DH vs PINC vs DOCS vs HCAT vs INVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definitive Healthca… (DH) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| Premier, Inc. (PINC) | 100 | 72.5 | -27.5% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 32.3 | -67.7% |
| Health Catalyst, In… (HCAT) | 100 | 3.2 | -96.8% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 136.4 | +36.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DH vs PINC vs DOCS vs HCAT vs INVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 11.9x)
- 3.2% yield, vs PINC's 3.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PINC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 3.0%
- Beta 0.07 vs HCAT's 2.05
- +24.0% vs DH's -66.1%
DOCS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 54.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 6.97x
- PEG 0.21 vs INVA's 1.15
- 20.0% revenue growth vs PINC's -10.9%
Among these 5 stocks, HCAT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
INVA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 94.9% 10Y total return vs PINC's -4.6%
- Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
- 118.9% margin vs DH's -71.5%
- 32.4% ROA vs HCAT's -27.4%, ROIC 14.2% vs -32.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs PINC's -10.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 11.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs DH's -71.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs HCAT's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs PINC's 3.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.0% vs DH's -66.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs HCAT's -27.4%, ROIC 14.2% vs -32.9% |
DH vs PINC vs DOCS vs HCAT vs INVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DH vs PINC vs DOCS vs HCAT vs INVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DH leads in 1 of 6 categories
DOCS leads 1 • INVA leads 1 • PINC leads 1 • HCAT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DOCS and INVA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PINC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 4.2x DH's $238M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DH's -71.5%. On growth, INVA holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $238M | $1.0B | $638M | $311M | $424M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $118M | $250M | -$110M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$170M | -$24M | $239M | -$178M | $504M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $37M | $265M | $314M | -$5M | $181M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.0% | +72.6% | +89.7% | +48.7% | +76.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.6% | -0.0% | +37.4% | -51.7% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -71.5% | -2.4% | +37.5% | -57.2% | +118.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +26.4% | +49.2% | -1.5% | +42.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.5% | -3.3% | +9.8% | -6.2% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.9% | -70.0% | -16.2% | -2.9% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DH leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 95% valuation discount to PINC's 128.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DOCS offers better value at 0.30x vs INVA's 0.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $96M | $2.3B | $5.2B | $113M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $111M | $2.5B | $5.0B | $82M | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.71x | 128.45x | 23.45x | -0.62x | 6.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.50x | 20.79x | 16.83x | 14.15x | 11.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.30x | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.25x | 21.35x | 21.14x | — | 8.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 2.31x | 9.18x | 0.36x | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.26x | 1.70x | 4.84x | 0.45x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.60x | 7.33x | 19.64x | — | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-55 for HCAT. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DH's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs PINC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -48.1% | -1.6% | +24.4% | -54.7% | +46.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.5% | -0.8% | +20.7% | -27.4% | +32.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.7% | +0.0% | +20.0% | -32.9% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.7% | +0.0% | +22.3% | -34.0% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.18x | 0.01x | 0.08x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $198M | -$197M | -$31M | -$282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $164M | $84M | $210M | $51M | $551M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $178M | $282M | $12M | $20M | $269M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.53x | 1.13x | — | -4.79x | 63.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,437 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $213 for DH. Over the past 12 months, PINC leads with a +24.0% total return vs DH's -66.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INVA at 25.0% vs DH's -54.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -61.2% | — | -39.9% | -30.3% | +14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.1% | +24.0% | -55.4% | -59.9% | +21.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.8% | +14.8% | -24.2% | -86.9% | +95.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -9.2% | -50.9% | -97.0% | +94.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -4.6% | -50.9% | -95.9% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -54.9% | +4.7% | -8.8% | -49.2% | +25.0% |
Risk & Volatility
PINC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PINC is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCAT's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PINC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs DH's 19.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.71x | 0.07x | 1.03x | 2.05x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.70 | $28.79 | $76.51 | $5.06 | $25.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.90 | $20.62 | $20.55 | $0.96 | $16.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.6% | +98.2% | +34.0% | +31.4% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 65.0 | 60.1 | 63.9 | 39.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 317K | 0 | 2.7M | 720K | 621K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DH and PINC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DH as "Hold", PINC as "Hold", DOCS as "Buy", HCAT as "Buy", INVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 239.5% upside for DH (target: $3) vs -0.0% for PINC (target: $28). For income investors, DH offers the higher dividend yield at 3.20% vs PINC's 2.98%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.13 | $28.25 | $42.79 | $2.50 | $37.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 31 | 22 | 22 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +3.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | $0.84 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +51.3% | +17.1% | +2.3% | +4.4% | +0.2% |
DH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). DOCS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
DH vs PINC vs DOCS vs HCAT vs INVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DH or PINC or DOCS or HCAT or INVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 9% for Premier, Inc. (PINC). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DH or PINC or DOCS or HCAT or INVA?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Premier, Inc. at 128. 5x. On forward P/E, Definitive Healthcare Corp. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus Innoviva, Inc. 's 1. 15x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DH or PINC or DOCS or HCAT or INVA?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -97. 9% for Definitive Healthcare Corp. (DH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INVA returned +94. 9% versus DH's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DH or PINC or DOCS or HCAT or INVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Premier, Inc.
(PINC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus Health Catalyst, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning HCAT is approximately 2781% more volatile than PINC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 47% for Definitive Healthcare Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DH or PINC or DOCS or HCAT or INVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -10. 9% for Premier, Inc. (PINC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -121. 7% for Health Catalyst, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DOCS leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DH or PINC or DOCS or HCAT or INVA?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -57. 5% for Definitive Healthcare Corp. — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -51. 7% for HCAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DH or PINC or DOCS or HCAT or INVA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus Innoviva, Inc. 's 1. 15x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Definitive Healthcare Corp. (DH) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Premier, Inc. — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DH: 239. 5% to $3. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — DH or PINC or DOCS or HCAT or INVA?
In this comparison, DH (3.
2% yield), PINC (3. 0% yield) pay a dividend. DOCS, HCAT, INVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DH or PINC or DOCS or HCAT or INVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Premier, Inc.
(PINC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 3. 0% yield). Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PINC: -4. 6%, HCAT: -95. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DH and PINC and DOCS and HCAT and INVA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PINC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock; HCAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. DH, PINC pay a dividend while DOCS, HCAT, INVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.