DIN
Dine Brands Global, Inc.
Restaurants
Market Cap$369M
5Y Perf.-37.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
DIN vs BLMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
Restaurants
Market Cap$678M
5Y Perf.-30.3%
DIN vs BLMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | DIN | BLMN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $369M | $678M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $890M | $3.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.9% | 1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 6.0x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.60B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $59M |
DIN vs BLMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
DIN
BLMN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dine Brands Global,… (DIN) | 100 | 62.3 | -37.7% |
| Bloomin' Brands, In… (BLMN) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DIN vs BLMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: DIN leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
DIN
Dine Brands Global, Inc.
The Income Pick
DIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.23, yield 7.7%
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth -73.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, current ratio 0.96x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
BLMN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -36.8% 10Y total return vs DIN's -41.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | DIN | 8.2% revenue growth vs BLMN's 0.1% |
| Value | DIN | Lower P/E (6.0x vs 9.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | DIN | 1.8% margin vs BLMN's 0.5% |
| Stability / Safety | DIN | Beta 1.23 vs BLMN's 1.82 |
| Dividends | DIN | 7.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BLMN's 5.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | DIN | +45.7% vs BLMN's +13.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DIN | 0.9% ROA vs BLMN's 0.7%, ROIC 9.0% vs 4.3% |
DIN vs BLMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
DIN vs BLMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLDINLAGGINGBLMN
BLMNBloomin' Brands, Inc.
0leads
DINDine Brands Global, I…
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BLMNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
DIN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
DIN4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
DIN6/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
DIN4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
DIN2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 4.5x DIN's $890M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.8% (DIN) to 0.5% (BLMN). On growth, DIN holds the edge at +4.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | DINDine Brands Globa… | BLMNBloomin' Brands, … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $890M | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $174M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $35M | $119M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +3.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.9% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.5% | +30.0% |
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.3x trailing earnings, DIN trades at a 80% valuation discount to BLMN's 126.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIN's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BLMN's 10.8x.
| Metric | DINDine Brands Globa… | BLMNBloomin' Brands, … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $369M | $678M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.26x | 125.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.01x | 9.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.87x | 10.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 0.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.91x | 7.00x |
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | DINDine Brands Globa… | BLMNBloomin' Brands, … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.6% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 9.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.79x | 1.06x |
DIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DIN five years ago would be worth $3,706 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,597 for BLMN. Over the past 12 months, DIN leads with a +45.7% total return vs BLMN's +13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DIN at -18.8% vs BLMN's -24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | DINDine Brands Globa… | BLMNBloomin' Brands, … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.3% | +24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.7% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.5% | -56.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.9% | -64.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.5% | -36.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.8% | -24.5% |
DIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DIN and BLMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLMN's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLMN currently trades 74.3% from its 52-week high vs DIN's 71.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | DINDine Brands Globa… | BLMNBloomin' Brands, … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.68 | $10.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.52 | $5.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.3% | +74.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 73.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 361K | 2.8M |
Evenly matched — DIN and BLMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
DIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DIN as "Hold" and BLMN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for DIN (target: $36) vs 6.9% for BLMN (target: $9). For income investors, DIN offers the higher dividend yield at 7.66% vs BLMN's 5.65%.
| Metric | DINDine Brands Globa… | BLMNBloomin' Brands, … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.33 | $8.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.7% | +5.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.17 | $0.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.4% | 0.0% |
DIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
DIN leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallDine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
DIN vs BLMN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DIN or BLMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) is the stronger pick with 8. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) offers the better valuation at 25. 3x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) a "Hold" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DIN or BLMN?
On trailing P/E, Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) is the cheapest at 25. 3x versus Bloomin' Brands, Inc. at 126. 0x. On forward P/E, Dine Brands Global, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DIN or BLMN?
Over the past 5 years, Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) delivered a total return of -62. 9%, compared to -64. 0% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLMN returned -36. 8% versus DIN's -41. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DIN or BLMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus Bloomin' Brands, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning BLMN is approximately 48% more volatile than DIN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — DIN or BLMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) is pulling ahead at 8. 2% versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bloomin' Brands, Inc. grew EPS 104. 2% year-over-year, compared to -73. 5% for Dine Brands Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLMN leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DIN or BLMN?
Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 9% net margin versus 0. 1% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DIN leads at 16. 3% versus 4. 1% for BLMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DIN leads at 39. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DIN or BLMN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 9. 5x for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIN: 28. 4% to $36. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — DIN or BLMN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) offers the highest yield at 7. 7%, versus 5. 6% for Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN).
09Is DIN or BLMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dine Brands Global, Inc.
(DIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23), 7. 7% yield). Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DIN: -41. 5%, BLMN: -36. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DIN and BLMN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(DIN: 4.9% · BLMN: 1.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(DIN: 25.3x · BLMN: 126.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.